No Access

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT IN OPEN DESIGN COMMUNITIES: A PROCESS PERSPECTIVE

CHRISTINA RAASCH

Institute of Technology and Innovation Management, Hamburg University of Technology, Schwarzenbergstr. 95 (D), 21073 Hamburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S021987701100260XCited by:18 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

Open source (OS) has raised significant attention in industrial practice and in scholarly research as a new and successful mode of product development. This paper is among the first to study open source development processes outside their original context, the software industry. In particular, we investigate the development of tangible products in so-called open design projects. We study how open design projects address the challenges usually put forward in the literature as barriers to the open development of tangible products. The analysis rests on the comparative qualitative investigation of four cases from different industries. We find that, subject to certain contingencies, open design processes can be organized to resemble OSS development processes to a considerable degree. Some practices are established specifically to uphold OS principles in the open design context, while others starkly differ from those found in OSS development. Our discussion focusses on different aspects of modularity as well as the availability of low-cost tools.

Keywords:

References

N. Abdelkafi, T. Blecker and C. Raasch, Management Decision 47(10), (2009). Google Scholar
K. Balka, C. Raasch and C. Herstatt, First Monday 14(11), (2009). Google Scholar
A. Bonaccorsi and C. Rossi, Research Policy 32(7), 1243 (2003). Crossref, Google Scholar
H. Chesbrough and M. M. Appleyard, California Management Review 50(1), 57 (2007). Crossref, Google Scholar
P. Dasgupta and P. A. David, Research Policy 23(5), 487 (1994). Google Scholar
J. C. Due naset al., IEEE Software 24(6), 90 (2007). Crossref, Google Scholar
K. M. Eisenhardt, Academy of Management Review 14(4), 532 (1989). Crossref, Google Scholar
R. Evered and M. R. Louis, Academy of Management Review 6(3), 385 (1981). Crossref, Google Scholar
B. Fitzgerald, MIS Quarterly 30(3), 587 (2006). Crossref, Google Scholar
O. Gassmann, R&D Management 36(3), 223 (2006). Crossref, Google Scholar
B. Gillham , Case Study Research Methods ( Continuum , London , 2000 ) . Google Scholar
P. Giuriet al., International Journal of Industrial Organization 28, 54 (2010). Crossref, Google Scholar
Hancock, T. (2008). "A graphic view of the open hardware movement. Part 2: Technical and social issues," Free Software Magazine (May 29th) . Google Scholar
D. Harhoff, J. Henkel and E. Von Hippel, Research Policy 32, 1753 (2003). Crossref, Google Scholar
Henkel, J. and Baldwin, C. Y. (2009). Modularity for Value Appropriation: Drawing the Boundaries of Intellectual Property. Harvard Business School Working Paper, Boston, MA . Google Scholar
C. Hicks and D. Pachamanova, Business Horizons 50, 315 (2007). Crossref, Google Scholar
G. K. Lee and R. E. Cole, Organization Science 14(6), 633 (2003). Crossref, Google Scholar
J. Lerner and J. Tirole, Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(2), 99 (2005). Crossref, Google Scholar
L. Liang , Guide to Open Content Licenses ( Piet Zwart Institute , Rotterdam , 2004 ) . Google Scholar
A. W. Morales, Software Development 12(4), 34 (2004). Google Scholar
G. Müller-Seitz and G. Reger , Open beyond the software code? — An explorative examination of the development of an open source car , Proceedings of the EIASM IPDM Conference 2008 ( 2008 ) . Google Scholar
S. O'Mahony, Research Policy 32(7), 1179 (2003). Crossref, Google Scholar
C. Raasch, C. Herstatt and K. Balka, R&D Management 39(4), 382 (2009). Crossref, Google Scholar
E. Raymond, Knowledge, Technology & Policy 12(3), 23 (1999). Crossref, Google Scholar
G. Ruhe and M. O. Saliu, IEEE Software 22(6), 47 (2005). Crossref, Google Scholar
Rullani, F. (2007). Dragging developers towards the core — How the Free/Libre/Open Source Software community enhances developers' contribution. Copenhagen/Pisa . Google Scholar
Salem, M. A. and Khatib, J. I. (2008). An Introduction to Open-Source Hardware Development. EETimes.com . Google Scholar
C. B. Schoonhoven, Organization Science 14(2), 208 (2003). Crossref, Google Scholar
R. Sen, C. Subramaniam and M. L. Nelson, Journal of Management Information Systems 25(3), 207 (2009). Crossref, Google Scholar
S. K. Shah, Management Science 52(7), 1000 (2006). Crossref, Google Scholar
C. Shirky , Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software , eds. J. Feller et al. ( MIT Press , Cambridge, MA , 2005 ) . Google Scholar
Shirky, C. (2007). Generalizing peer production into the physical world. http://finance. groups.yahoo.com/group/decentralization/message/6967 . Google Scholar
Thompson, C. (2008). "Build it. Share it. Profit. Can Open Source hardware work?" Wired Magazine (16.11.2007) . Google Scholar
J. P. Ulhøi, Management Decision 42(9), 1095 (2004). Crossref, Google Scholar
R. Vallance , S. Kiani and S. Nayfeh , Open design of manufacturing equipment , Proceedings of the CHIRP 1st International Conference on Agile, Reconfigurable Manufacturing ( 2001 ) . Google Scholar
E. Von Hippel, Industrial and Corporate Change 16(2), 293 (2007). Crossref, Google Scholar
E. Von Hippel and G. Von Krogh, Organization Science 14(2), 208 (2003). Google Scholar
J. West, Research Policy 32(7), 1259 (2003). Crossref, Google Scholar
Whitney, D. E. (2005). "Physical limits to modularity," Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division, Working Paper . Google Scholar
R. K. Yin , Case Study Research: Design and Methods ( Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage , 2003 ) . Google Scholar
R. F. Zammutoet al., Organization Science 18(5), 749 (2007). Crossref, Google Scholar