No Access

Supporting the Management of Ecosystem Services in Protected Areas: Trade-Offs Between Effort and Accuracy in Evaluation

Uta Schirpke

Institute for Alpine Environment, EURAC Research, Viale Druso 1, 39100 Bolzano, Italy

Institute of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestr. 15, 60200 Innsbruck, Austria

E-mail Address: uta.schirpke@eurac.edu

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

Rocco Scolozzi

Department of Sociology and Social Research, University of Trento, Via Verdi 26, 38122 Trento, Italy

E-mail Address: rocco.scolozzi@unitn.it

Search for more papers by this author

Benedetta Concetti

Regional Agency for Services to Agriculture and Forestry (ERSAF), Via Oliva 32, 25084 Gargnano, Italy

E-mail Address: benedetta.concetti@ersaf.lombardia.it

Search for more papers by this author

Bruna Comini

Regional Agency for Services to Agriculture and Forestry (ERSAF), Via Oliva 32, 25084 Gargnano, Italy

E-mail Address: bruna.comini@ersaf.lombardia.it

Search for more papers by this author

, and

Ulrike Tappeiner

Institute for Alpine Environment, EURAC Research, Viale Druso 1, 39100 Bolzano, Italy

Institute of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestr. 15, 60200 Innsbruck, Austria

E-mail Address: ulrike.tappeiner@uibk.ac.at

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333217500077Cited by:7 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

Integrating ecosystem services (ES) into the management of protected areas, such as European Natura 2000 sites, can improve biodiversity conservation and human well-being; yet, the assessment and application of ES remains challenging. In this study, we propose a roadmap to guide managers in the assessment of ES at multiple levels, including a non-monetary valuation in qualitative and quantitative terms, as well as a monetary valuation, and suggesting the appropriate applications related to ES mapping, communication and planning. The roadmap proceeds through four steps and along a gradient of accuracy and effort required in the assessment methods, with different levels of spatial scale, to effectively support managers. Together with the description of the roadmap, this paper provides insights from its application to terrestrial Natura 2000 sites in Italy.

Keywords:

References

Armsworth, PR, L Cantú-Salazar, M Parnell, ZG Davies and R Stoneman [2011] Management costs for small protected areas and economies of scale in habitat conservation. Biological Conservation, 144, 423–429. Crossref, Google Scholar
Autorità di Bacino del Fiume Arno (2008). Progetto di Piano di Bacino Stralcio “Bilancio Idrico”. Report, December 2010 (in Italian). Google Scholar
Balvanera, P, AB Pfisterer, N Buchmann et al. [2006] Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecology Letters, 9, 1146–1156, doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00963.x. Crossref, Google Scholar
Bastian, O [2013] The role of biodiversity in supporting ecosystem services in Natura 2000 sites. Ecological Indicators, 24, 12–22, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.05.016. Crossref, Google Scholar
Blicharska, M, EH Orlikowska, JM Roberge and M Grodzinska-Jurczak [2016] Contribution of social science to large scale biodiversity conservation: A review of research about the Natura 2000 network. Biological Conservation, 199, 110–122. Crossref, Google Scholar
Bosco, C and D de Rigo (2013). Land cover and soil erodibility within the e-RUSLE model. Report No. MRI-11b13, Scientific Topics Focus Series, Notes on Transdisciplinary Modelling for Environment, Maieutike Research Initiative, Italy. Google Scholar
Bossard, M, J Feranec and J Otahel (2000). CORINE land cover technical guide: Addendum 2000. Technical Report No. 40, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen. Google Scholar
Brink, P, S Bassi, T Badura et al. (2011). Estimating the overall economic value of the benefits provided by the Natura 2000 Network. Final Report to the European Commission, DG Environment on Contract ENV.B.2/SER/2008/0038, Institute for European Environmental Policy/GHK/Ecologic, Brussels, December 2011. Google Scholar
Burkhard, B, F Kroll, S Nedkov and F Müller [2012] Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21, 17–29, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019. Crossref, Google Scholar
Burkhard, B, M Kandziora, Y Hou and F Müller [2014] Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands — Concepts for spatial localization, indication and quantification. Landscape Online, 34, 1–32. Crossref, Google Scholar
Castro, AJ, B Martín-López, E López et al. [2015] Do protected areas networks ensure the supply of ecosystem services? Spatial patterns of two nature reserve systems in semi-arid Spain. Applied Geography, 60, 1–9. Crossref, Google Scholar
Croitoru, L and P Gatto [2001] Una stima del valore economico totale del bosco in aree Mediterranee. Monti e Boschi, 52 (5), 22–30. Google Scholar
de Groot, RS, R Alkemade, L Braat, L Hein and L Willemen [2010] Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7, 260–272, doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006. Crossref, Google Scholar
EEA (2012). CORINE Land Cover 2006 (CLC2006) Seamless Vector Database: Version 16(04/2012). Available at: http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/clc-2006-vector-data-version-2 [accessed 23 March 2013]. Google Scholar
EEA (2013). Natura 2000 data — The European network of protected sites. Available at: http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/natura-3 [accessed 31 July 2013]. Google Scholar
Egoh, B, M Rouget, B Reyers et al. [2007] Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments: A review. Ecological Economics, 63 (4), 714–721. Crossref, Google Scholar
Egoh, B, EG Drakou, MB Dunbar, J Maes and L Willemen [2012] Indicators for Mapping Ecosystem Services: A Review. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Google Scholar
Eigenbrod, F, PR Armsworth, BJ Anderson et al. [2010] The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47 (2), 377–385. Crossref, Google Scholar
Federici, S, M Vitullo, S Tulipano, R De Lauretis and G Seufert [2008] An approach to estimate carbon stocks change in forest carbon pools under the UNFCCC: The Italian case. iForest: Biogeosciences and Forestry, 1, 86–95. Crossref, Google Scholar
Fisher, B, RK Turner and P Morling [2009] Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68, 643–653, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014. Crossref, Google Scholar
Gaglioppa, P (ed.) (2016). Applicazione del modello dimostrativo di valutazione qualitativa e quantitativa dei servizi ecosistemici nei siti ERSAF (LIFE+11 ENV/IT/000168). Report dell’azione B 5, CURSA, Roma. Available at: http://www.lifemgn-serviziecosistemici.eu/IT/Documents/doc_mgn/LIFE+MGN_Report_B5.pdf [accessed 16 February]. Google Scholar
Gasparini, P and G Tobacchi (eds.) (2011). L’Inventario Nazionale delle Foreste e dei serbatoi forestali di Carbonio INFC 2005. Secondo inventario forestale nazionale italiano. Metodi e risultati. Ministero delle Politiche Agricole, Alimentari e Forestali, Corpo Forestale dello Stato. Consiglio perla Ricerca e la Sperimatazione in Agricoltura, Unita diricerca peril Moritoraggio e la Pianificazione Forestale. Edagricole-II Sole 24 one, Bologna. 653pp. Google Scholar
Giordano, A [1999] Pedologia. Torino: UTET. Google Scholar
Goio, I [2006] La funzione produttiva delle foreste: Confronto tra contabilità standard e verde. Estimo e Territorio, 11, 16–23. Google Scholar
Goldman, RL and H Tallis [2009] A critical analysis of ecosystem services as a tool in conservation projects. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1162, 63–78, doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04151.x. Crossref, Google Scholar
Guerry, AD et al. [2015] Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112 (24), 7348–7355. Crossref, Google Scholar
Haines-Young, R and M Potschin (2011). Common international classification of ecosystem services (CICES): 2011 Update. Discussion Paper, Expert Meeting Organised by UNSD/EEA/World Bank, London. Google Scholar
Haslett, JR, PM Berry, G Bela et al. [2010] Changing conservation strategies in Europe: A framework integrating ecosystem services and dynamics. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19, 2963–2977. Crossref, Google Scholar
Hou, Y, B Burkhard and F Müller [2013] Uncertainties in landscape analysis and ecosystem service assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 127, S117–S131. Crossref, Google Scholar
Ingram, JC, KH Redford and JE Watson [2012] Applying ecosystem services approaches for biodiversity conservation: Benefits and challenges. SAPIENS: Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society, 5 (1), 1–11. Google Scholar
IPCC (2003). Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. Report, IPCC Technical Support Unit, Kanagawa, Japan. Google Scholar
ISTAT (2003). Coltivazioni agricole, foreste e caccia. Informazioni n. 28 - 2003, Settore Agricoltura, ISTAT, Italy (tavola 3.6). Google Scholar
ISTAT (2011). Datawarehouse Censimento popolazione. Available at: http://www.istat.it [accessed 05 April 2013]. Google Scholar
Jacobs, S, B Burkhard, T Van Daele, J Staes and A Schneiders [2015] ‘ The Matrix Reloaded’: A review of expert knowledge use for mapping ecosystem services. Ecological Modelling, 295, 21–30. Crossref, Google Scholar
Kandziora, M, B Burkhard and F Müller [2013] Interactions of ecosystem properties, ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service indicators — A theoretical matrix exercise. Ecological Indicators, 28, 54–78. Crossref, Google Scholar
Kati, V, T Hovardas, M Dieterich et al. [2015] The challenge of implementing the European network of protected areas Natura 2000. Conservation Biology, 29 (1), 260–270. Crossref, Google Scholar
Kettunen, M, P Ten Brink, S Bassi and S Gantioler (2009). Assessing socio-economic benefits of Natura 2000 — A toolkit for practitioners (September 2009 Edition). Output of the European Commission Project Financing Natura 2000: Cost Estimate and Benefits of Natura 2000 (Contract No. 070307/2007/484403/MAR/B2), Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP), Brussels, Belgium. Google Scholar
Kosmus, M, I Renner and S Ullrich (2012). Integrating ecosystem services into development planning: A stepwise approach for practitioners based on the TEEB approach. Report, GIZ, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Lockwood, M [2010] Good governance for terrestrial protected areas: A framework, principles and performance outcomes. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 754–766, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.10.005. Crossref, Google Scholar
Mace, GM, K Norris and AH Fitter [2012] Biodiversity and ecosystem services: A multilayered relationship. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27, 19–26. Crossref, Google Scholar
Maes, J, A Teller, M Erhard et al. (2013). Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services — An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Discussion Paper, European Union, Luxembourg. Google Scholar
Marino, D, U Schirpke, P Gaglioppa and D Pellegrino [2014] Assessment and governance of ecosystem services: First insights from Life+ Making Good Natura project. Annali di Botanica, 4, 83–90. Google Scholar
Martínez-Harms, MJ, BA Bryan, P Balvanera et al. [2015] Making decisions for managing ecosystem services. Biological Conservation, 184, 229–238. Crossref, Google Scholar
Martínez-Harms, MJ and R Gajardo [2008] Ecosystem value in the Western Patagonia protected areas. Journal for Nature Conservation, 16, 72–87. Crossref, Google Scholar
Martín-López, B, M García-Llorente, I Palomo and C Montes [2011] The conservation against development paradigm in protected areas: Valuation of ecosystem services in the Doñana social–ecological system (southwestern Spain). Ecological Economics, 70, 1481–1491, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.009. Crossref, Google Scholar
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) [2005] Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, D.C.: Island Press. Google Scholar
Morri, E, F Pruscini, R Scolozzi and R Santolini [2014] A forest ecosystem services evaluation at the river basin scale: Supply and demand between coastal areas and upstream lands (Italy). Ecological Indicators, 37, 210–219. Crossref, Google Scholar
Palomo, I, B Martín-López, M Potschin, R Haines-Young and C Montes [2013] National parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: Mapping ecosystem service flows. Ecosystem Services, 4, 104–116, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.09.001. Crossref, Google Scholar
Palomo, I, B Martín-López, P Zorrilla-Miras, DG Del Amo and C Montes [2014] Deliberative mapping of ecosystem services within and around Doñana National Park (SW Spain) in relation to land use change. Regional Environmental Change, 14 (1), 237–251. Crossref, Google Scholar
Pellegrino, D, U Schirpke and D Marino [2016] How to support the effective management of Natura 2000 sites? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60 (3), 383–398, doi: 10.1080/09640568.2016.1159183. Crossref, Google Scholar
Reyers, B, S Polasky, H Tallis, HA Mooney and A Larigauderie [2012] Finding common ground for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Bioscience, 62, 503–507. Crossref, Google Scholar
Roose, E [1996] Land Husbandry — Components and Strategy, 70 FAO Soils Bulletin. Rome: Food & Agriculture Organization of the UN. Google Scholar
Ruckelshaus, M, E McKenzie, H Tallis et al. [2015] Notes from the field: Lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions. Ecological Economics, 115, 11–21. Crossref, Google Scholar
Schägner, JP, L Brander, J Maes and V Hartje [2013] Mapping ecosystem services’ values: Current practice and future prospects. Ecosystem Services, 4, 33–46, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.003. Crossref, Google Scholar
Schirpke, U, R Scolozzi, R Da Re et al. (n.d.). Outdoor recreation in Natura 2000 sites: Who are the beneficiaries? Submitted to Society & Natural Resources. Under review (2017). Google Scholar
Schirpke, U, R Scolozzi, C De Marco and U Tappeiner [2014] Mapping beneficiaries of ecosystem services flows from Natura 2000 sites. Ecosystem Services, 9, 170–179. Crossref, Google Scholar
Schulp, CJ, B Burkhard, J Maes, J Van Vliet and PH Verburg [2014] Uncertainties in ecosystem service maps: A comparison on the European scale. PLoS ONE, 9 (10), e109643. Crossref, Google Scholar
Scolozzi, R, E Morri and R Santolini [2012] Delphi-based change assessment in ecosystem service values to support strategic spatial planning in Italian landscapes. Ecological Indicators, 21, 134–144, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.07.019. Crossref, Google Scholar
Scolozzi, R, U Schirpke, E Morri, D D’Amato and R Santolini [2014] Ecosystem services-based SWOT analysis of protected areas for conservation strategies. Journal of Environmental Management, 146, 543–551. Crossref, Google Scholar
Spangenberg, JH and J Settele [2010] Precisely incorrect? Monetising the value of ecosystem services. Ecological Complexity, 7, 327–337. Crossref, Google Scholar
TEEB [2010] The Economic Of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: The Ecological and Economic Foundations, P Kumar (ed.). London and Washington, D.C.: Earthscan. Google Scholar
Tol, RSJ [2005] The marginal damage costs of carbon dioxide emissions: An assessment of the uncertainties. Energy Policy, 33, 2064–2074. Crossref, Google Scholar
Torri, D, L Borselli, F Guzzetti et al. [2006] Italy. In Soil Erosion in Europe, J Boardman and J Poesen (eds.), pp. 245–261. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Crossref, Google Scholar
Turc, L [1954] Le bilan d’eau des sols: Relation entre les précipitations, l’évaporation et l’écoulement. Annales Agronomiques, Série A, 5, 491–595. Google Scholar
van der Sluijs, J [2005] Uncertainty as a monster in the science-policy interface: Four coping strategies. Water Science & Technology, 52, 87–92. Crossref, Google Scholar
Wischmeier, WH and DD Smith [1978] Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses: A Guide to Conservation Planning, Agriculture Handbook No. 537, USDA/Science and Education Administration. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Google Scholar
Wunder, S [2013] When payments for environmental services will work for conservation. Conservation Letters, 6, 230–237. Crossref, Google Scholar