No Access

THE ARTIFACT PROJECT — HISTORY, SCIENCE, AND DESIGN INQUIRY IN TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING AT ELEMENTARY LEVEL

KAIJU KANGAS

Department of Teacher Education, University of Joensuu, P. O. Box 86, 57101 Savonlinna, Finland

Search for more papers by this author

PIRITA SEITAMAA-HAKKARAINEN

Department of Teacher Education, University of Joensuu, P. O. Box 86, 57101 Savonlinna, Finland

Search for more papers by this author

, and

KAI HAKKARAINEN

Department of Teacher Education, University of Joensuu, P. O. Box 86, 57101 Savonlinna, Finland

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793206807000397Cited by:6 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

The general objective of the present study was to investigate how elementary school students engage in their knowledge construction processes in computer-supported collaborative learning. We will report a longitudinal case study of a teacher's and researchers' effort to create classroom activities and social practices that support genuine participation in knowledge-creating inquiry. In this curriculum unit, The Artifact Project — the Past, the Present, and the Future, the students were asked to analyze artifacts within their cultural historical context, study physical phenomena related to artifacts, examine designs of prevailing artifacts, and finally to design artifacts for the future. We were interested in the nature of questions and explanations generated by the students in the course of their inquiry mediated by Knowledge Forum. While the present investigation was inspired by Marlene Scardamalia's and Carl Bereiter's knowledge building approach, it was focused on examining how pursuit of conceptual artifacts (ideas, concepts, designs, drawings) can productively be integrated with various, materially embodied "hands on" activities, such as taking photos of, drawing, exploring, analyzing, and designing material artifacts. We were, further, interested in the constructive use of students' references to offline activities and expert resources during their inquiry processes. The nature of knowledge generated diverged substantially from one phase of the study to another; a relatively larger percentage of questions and content-related notes produced during the past (history) part of the project was factual in nature in comparison with the present (science experiments) and future (design activities) parts. The results of the present study indicated that conceptual and material aspects of the participants' activities supported one another; the participants were clearly both "minds" and "hands on" throughout the project. It appears that teachers would do well to put students ideas into the centre of educational activity, and also to pursue various materially embodied activities (organizing exhibitions, analyzing and describing, and design). Generally, educators would do well to promote students' undertaking boundary-breaking processes during which connections are forged with expert communities.

Keywords:

References

C. Bereiter , Education and mind in the knowledge age ( Erlbaum , Mahwah, NJ , 2002 ) . Google Scholar
C. Bereiter and M. Scardamalia , Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise ( Open Court , Chicago, IL , 1993 ) . Google Scholar
C. Bereiter and M. Scardamalia , Unravelling basic components and dimensions of powerful learning environments , EARLI Advances in Learning and Instruction Series , eds. E. de Corte et al. ( 2003 ) . Google Scholar
A. L. Brownet al., Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations, ed. G. Salomon (Cambridge University press, 1993) pp. 188–228. Google Scholar
A. L. Brown and J. C. Campione, Innovations in learning: New environments for education, eds. L. Schauhe and R. Glaser (Erlbaum, New Jersey, 1996) pp. 288–325. Google Scholar
S. Carey and C. Smith, Software goes to school, eds. D. N. Perkinset al. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995) pp. 39–55. Google Scholar
M. T. Chi, Journal of the Learning Sciences 6, 271 (1997). Crossref, Google Scholar
M. Cole , Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline ( Harvard University Press , Cambridge , 1996 ) . Google Scholar
G. Fisheret al., International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 63, 482 (2005). Crossref, Google Scholar
Hakkarainen, K. (1998). Epistemology of inquiry and computer-supported collaborative Learning. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Toronto . Google Scholar
K. Hakkarainen, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40(10), 1072 (2003). Crossref, Google Scholar
K. Hakkarainen , K. Lonka and L. Lipponen , Progressive inquiry: Overcoming constraints of human intelligent activity (in Finnish) ( WSOY , Porvoo , 1999 ) . Google Scholar
K. Hakkarainen, L. Lipponen and S. Järvelä, CSCL2: Carrying forward the conversation, eds. T. Kochmann, R. Hall and N. Miake (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 2001) pp. 128–156. Google Scholar
K. Hakkarainen and M. Sintonen, Science & Education 11, 25 (2002). Crossref, Google Scholar
K. Hakkarainen et al. , Communities of networked expertise. Professional and educational perspectives ( Elsevier , Oxford , 2004 ) . Google Scholar
K. Hakkarainen , K. Lonka and L. Lipponen , Progressive inquiry: How reason, emotion, and culture lighten up learning (in Finnish) ( WSOY , Helsinki , 2004 ) . Google Scholar
Hakkarainen, K., Ilomäki, L., Muukkonen, H., Toiviainen, H., Markkanen, H., & Richter, C. 2006. Design principles and practices for the knowledge practice laboratory (KB-Lab) project. In W. Nejdl & K. Tochtermann (Eds.), Innovative approaches for learning and knowledge sharing. In Proceedings of the first European conference on technology enhanced learning. EC-TEL. Lecture notes in computer science. (pp. 603–608). Springer: Berlin . Google Scholar
I. Harel , Children designers ( Ablex , Norwood, NJ , 1991 ) . Google Scholar
S. Hennessy and P. Murphy, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 9, 1 (1999). Crossref, Google Scholar
J. Hintikka , Selected papers of Jaakko Hintikka 5 ( Kluwer , Dordrecht , 1999 ) . Google Scholar
V. John-Steiner , Creative collaboration ( Oxford University Press , New York , 2000 ) . Google Scholar
Y. B. Kafaiet al., International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 3(2), 149 (1998). Crossref, Google Scholar
J. Kolodner, Journal of Industrial Teacher Education 39(3), 1 (2002). Google Scholar
B. Latour , Pandora's hope ( Harvard University Press , Cambridge, MA , 1999 ) . Google Scholar
B. Latour , Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory ( Oxford University Press , Oxford , 2005 ) . Crossref, Google Scholar
L. Lipponenet al., Journal of Educational Computing Research 27, 353 (2002). Google Scholar
F. Marton and K. Trigwell, Higher Education Research & Development 19, 380 (2000). Crossref, Google Scholar
J. D. Novak , Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations ( Erlbaum , Mahwah, NJ , 1998 ) . Crossref, Google Scholar
K. Popper , Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach ( Oxford University Press , Oxford , 1972 ) . Google Scholar
W.-M. Roth , Designing communities ( Kluwer Academic Publisher , Boston , 1998 ) . Crossref, Google Scholar
M. Scardamalia, Wisdom & wizardry: Celebrating the pioneers of online education, ed. L. Harasim (Telelearning Inc, Vancouver, BC, 1999) pp. 14–15. Google Scholar
M. Scardamalia, Liberal education in a knowledge society, ed. B. Smith (Open Court, Chigago, 2002) pp. 67–98. Google Scholar
M. Scardamalia, Encyclopedia of distributed learning, eds. A. DiStefano, K. E. Rudestam and R. Silverman (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2003) pp. 269–272. Google Scholar
M. Scardamalia and C. Bereiter, In encyclopedia of education, 2nd edn. (Macmillan Reference, New York, 2003) pp. 1370–1373. Google Scholar
P. Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, H. Lahti and K. Hakkarainen, Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education 4(2), 101 (2005). Crossref, Google Scholar
R. Säljö , New perspectives on conceptual change , eds. W. Schnotz , S. Vosniadou and M. Carretero ( Elsevier , Oxford , 1999 ) . Google Scholar
J. V. Wertsch, Mind as action (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998) pp. 81–90. Google Scholar
M. Wheeler , J. Ziman and M. Boden , The evolution of cultural entities ( Oxford University Press , Oxford , 2002 ) . Crossref, Google Scholar
J. Zhanget al., Educational Technology Research and Development 55(2), 117 (2007). Crossref, Google Scholar