World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.
No Access

Supply Chain Management Practices and Product Development: A Moderated Mediation Model of Supply Chain Responsiveness, Organization Structure, and Research and Development

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219686717500032Cited by:16 (Source: Crossref)
    Previous
    Next

    References

    • 1. G. W. Fuller , New Food Product Development: From Concept to Marketplace (CRC Press, 2016). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 2. B. J. Zirger and M. A. Maidique , A model of new product development: An empirical test, Management Science 36 (7) (1990) 867–883. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 3. I. I. Perry and F. John, The impact of supply chain business processes on competitive advantage and organizational performance, No. AFIT/LSCM/ENS/12-14, Air Force Inst of Tech Wright-Patterson AFB OH School Of Engineering And Management (2012). Google Scholar
    • 4. N. A. Ebrahim , Virtual R&D teams: A new model for product development, International Journal of Innovation 3 (2) (2015) 1. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 5. S. Li, B. Ragu-Nathan, T. S. Ragu-Nathan and S. S. Rao , The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance, Omega 34 (2) (2006) 107–124. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 6. S. C. Lenny Koh, M. Demirbag, E. Bayraktar, E. Tatoglu and S. Zaim , The impact of supply chain management practices on performance of SMEs, Industrial Management and Data Systems 107 (1) (2007) 103–124. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 7. T. Schoenherr and M. Swink , The roles of supply chain intelligence and adaptability in new product launch success, Decision Sciences 46 (5) (2015) 901–936. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 8. M. Morita, J. A. Machuca, E. J. Flynn and J. L. P. de los Ríos , Aligning product characteristics and the supply chain process — A normative perspective, International Journal of Production Economics 161 (2015) 228–241. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 9. E. Mazzola, M. Bruccoleri and G. Perrone , Supply chain of innovation and new product development, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 21 (4) (2015) 273–284. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 10. R. Aydin, C. K. Kwong and P. Ji , Coordination of the closed-loop supply chain for product line design with consideration of remanufactured products, Journal of Cleaner Production 114 (2016) 286–298. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 11. G. L. Ragatz, R. B. Handfield and K. J. Petersen , Benefits associated with supplier integration into new product development under conditions of technology uncertainty, Journal of Business Research 55 (5) (2002) 389–400. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 12. A. Walter , Relationship-specific factors influencing supplier involvement in customer new product development, Journal of Business Research 56 (9) (2003) 721–733. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 13. D. Luzzini, M. Amann, F. Caniato, M. Essig and S. Ronchi , The path of innovation: Purchasing and supplier involvement into new product development, Industrial Marketing Management 47 (2015) 109–120. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 14. K. D. Wowak, C. W. Craighead, D. J. Ketchen and G. T. M. Hult , Toward a “theoretical toolbox” for the supplier-enabled fuzzy front end of the new product development process, Journal of Supply Chain Management 52 (1) (2016) 66–81. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 15. K. Brockhoff , Customers’ perspectives of involvement in new product development, International Journal of Technology Management 26 (5–6) (2003) 464–481. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 16. M. Sigala , Social networks and customer involvement in new service development (NSD) The case of www. mystarbucksidea.Com, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 24 (7) (2012) 966–990. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 17. R. Filieri , Consumer co-creation and new product development: A case study in the food industry, Marketing Intelligence and Planning 31 (1) (2013) 40–53. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 18. A. S. Cui and F. Wu , The impact of customer involvement on new product development: Contingent and substitutive effects, Journal of Product Innovation Management 34 (1) (2016) 60–80. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 19. B. Menguc, S. Auh and P. Yannopoulos , Customer and supplier involvement in design: The moderating role of incremental and radical innovation capability, Journal of Product Innovation Management 31 (2) (2014) 313–328. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 20. S. Min and J. T. Mentzer , Developing and measuring supply chain management concepts, Journal of Business Logistics 25 (1) (2004) 63–99. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 21. S. T. Cavusgil and E. Cavusgil , Reflections on international marketing: Destructive regeneration and multinational firms, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 40 (2) (2012) 202–217. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 22. S. Perçin and H. Min , A hybrid quality function deployment and fuzzy decision-making methodology for the optimal selection of third-party logistics service providers, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 16 (5) (2013) 380–397. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 23. W. Yu, M. A. Jacobs, W. D. Salisbury and H. Enns , The effects of supply chain integration on customer satisfaction and financial performance: An organizational learning perspective, International Journal of Production Economics 146 (1) (2013) 346–358. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 24. T. A. Chin and H. H. Tat , Does gender diversity moderate the relationship between supply chain management practice and performance in the electronic manufacturing services industry? International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 18 (1) (2015) 35–45. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 25. A. Paulraj, I. J. Chen and C. Blome , Motives and performance outcomes of sustainable supply chain management practices: A multi-theoretical perspective, Journal of Business Ethics (2015) 1–20, doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2857-0. Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 26. D. A. Marshall , Assessing the value of supply chain information sharing in the new millennium, International Journal of Supply Chain Management 4 (4) (2015) 10–21. Google Scholar
    • 27. S. Qrunfleh and M. Tarafdar , Supply chain management practices–IT utilisation alignment: Impact on supply chain performance and firm performance, International Journal of Business Information Systems 18 (4) (2015) 364–389. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 28. S. C. Graves and T. Schoenmeyr , Strategic safety-stock placement in supply chains with capacity constraints, Manufacturing and Service Operations Management 18 (3) (2016) 445–460. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 29. F. Firouzi, M. Y. Jaber and E. Baglieri , Trust in supply forecast information sharing, International Journal of Production Research 54 (5) (2016) 1322–1333. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 30. Y. Shi, A. Zhang, T. Arthanari and Y. Liu , Third-party purchase: An empirical study of Chinese third-party logistics users, International Journal of Operations and Production Management 36 (3) (2016) 286–307. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 31. M. M. Wilhelm, C. Blome, V. Bhakoo and A. Paulraj , Sustainability in multi-tier supply chains: Understanding the double agency role of the first-tier supplier, Journal of Operations Management 41 (2016) 42–60. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 32. E. Tatoglu, E. Bayraktar, I. Golgeci, S. L. Koh, M. Demirbag and S. Zaim , How do supply chain management and information systems practices influence operational performance? Evidence from emerging country SMEs, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 19 (3) (2016) 181–199. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 33. S. Emmett and B. Crocker , The Relationship-Driven Supply Chain: Creating a Culture of Collaboration Throughout the Chain (CRC Press, 2016). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 34. H. Moradlou and C. J. Backhouse , A review of manufacturing re-shoring in the context of customer-focused postponement strategies, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture (2016), doi: 10.1177/0954405415623486. Google Scholar
    • 35. S. Brockhaus, S. Fawcett, W. Kersten and M. Knemeyer , A framework for benchmarking product sustainability efforts: Using systems dynamics to achieve supply chain alignment, Benchmarking: An International Journal 23 (1) (2016) 127–164. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 36. K. R. Lou and L. Wang , Nash and integrated solutions in a just-in-time seller–buyer supply chain with buyer’s ordering cost reductions, International Journal of Systems Science 47 (7) (2016) 1615–1623. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 37. M. Eskandarian, G. Marthandan, C. A. Malarvizhi and S. Z. Tehrani , Quality in e-procurement success, International Journal of Management and Information Systems 20 (3) (2016) 73. Google Scholar
    • 38. B. K. Brockman and R. M. Morgan , The moderating effect of organizational cohesiveness in knowledge use and new product development, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34 (3) (2006) 295–307. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 39. J. Mu and C. A. Di Benedetto , Strategic orientations and new product commercialization: Mediator, moderator, and interplay, R&D Management 41 (4) (2011) 337–359. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 40. B. D. Williams, J. Roh, T. Tokar and M. Swink , Leveraging supply chain visibility for responsiveness: The moderating role of internal integration, Journal of Operations Management 31 (7) (2013) 543–554. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 41. M. Kim, N. C. Suresh and C. Kocabasoglu-Hillmer , An impact of manufacturing flexibility and technological dimensions of manufacturing strategy on improving supply chain responsiveness: Business environment perspective, International Journal of Production Research 51 (18) (2013) 5597–5611. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 42. S. H. Hum and M. Parlar , Measurement and optimization of supply chain responsiveness, IIE Transactions 46 (1) (2014) 1–22. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 43. M. Jahre and N. Fabbe-Costes , How standards and modularity can improve humanitarian supply chain responsiveness: The case of emergency response units, Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management 5 (3) (2015) 348–386. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 44. E. Sandberg , Restructuring the supply chain to meet customer demands — The supply chain responsiveness of a Swedish wholesaler, The 20th Annual International Symposium on Logistics (ISL), Bologna, Italy (2015), pp. 36–37. Google Scholar
    • 45. J. Moyano-Fuentes, M. Sacristán-Díaz and P. Garrido-Vega , Improving supply chain responsiveness through Advanced Manufacturing Technology: The mediating role of internal and external integration, Production Planning and Control 27 (2016) 686–697. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 46. A. A. Thatte, S. S. Rao and T. S. Ragu-Nathan , Impact of SCM practices of a firm on supply chain responsiveness and competitive advantage of a firm, Journal of Applied Business Research 29 (2) (2013) 499–530. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 47. S. Qrunfleh and M. Tarafdar , Lean and agile supply chain strategies and supply chain responsiveness: The role of strategic supplier partnership and postponement, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 18 (6) (2013) 571–582. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 48. S. L. Brown and K. M. Eisenhardt , Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions, Academy of Management Review 20 (2) (1995) 343–378. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 49. T. Morgan, S. Anokhin, A. Kretinin and J. Frishammar , The dark side of the entrepreneurial orientation and market orientation interplay: A new product development perspective, International Small Business Journal 33 (7) (2015) 731–751. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 50. A. De Massis, J. Kotlar, F. Frattini, J. J. Chrisman and M. Nordqvist , Family governance at work organizing for new product development in family SMEs, Family Business Review (2016), doi: 10.1177/0894486515622722. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 51. R. B. Handfield and C. Bechtel , The role of trust and relationship structure in improving supply chain responsiveness, Industrial Marketing Management 31 (4) (2002) 367–382. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 52. P. Danese, P. Romano and M. Formentini , The impact of supply chain integration on responsiveness: The moderating effect of using an international supplier network, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 49 (1) (2013) 125–140. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 53. E. Cantor, D. , J. Blackhurst, M. Pan and M. Crum , Examining the role of stakeholder pressure and knowledge management on supply chain risk and demand responsiveness, The International Journal of Logistics Management 25 (1) (2014) 202–223. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 54. Z. Cai, Q. Huang, H. Liu and L. Liang , The moderating role of information technology capability in the relationship between supply chain collaboration and organizational responsiveness: Evidence from China, International Journal of Operations and Production Management 36 (10) (2016) 1247–1271. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 55. Q. Zhu and J. Sarkis , Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises, Journal of Operations Management 22 (3) (2004) 265–289. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 56. A. Oke, D. I. Prajogo and J. Jayaram , Strengthening the innovation chain: The role of internal innovation climate and strategic relationships with supply chain partners, Journal of Supply Chain Management 49 (4) (2013) 43–58. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 57. Z. Liu, D. Prajogo and A. Oke , Supply chain technologies: Linking adoption, utilization, and performance, Journal of Supply Chain Management 52 (4) (2016) 22–41. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 58. D. S. Pugh, D. J. Hickson, C. R. Hinings and C. Turner , Dimensions of organization structure, Administrative Science Quarterly 1 (1968) 65–105. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 59. J. Child , Predicting and understanding organization structure, Administrative Science Quarterly 1 (1973) 168–185. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 60. L. A. Gordon and V. K. Narayanan , Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure: An empirical investigation, Accounting, Organizations and Society 9 (1) (1984) 33–47. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 61. J. G. Covin and D. P. Slevin , The influence of organization structure on the utility of an entrepreneurial top management style, Journal of Management Studies 25 (3) (1988) 217–234. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 62. R. C. Levin, A. K. Klevorick, R. R. Nelson, S. G. Winter, R. Gilbert and Z. Griliches, Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1987(3) (1987) 783–831. Google Scholar
    • 63. N. R. Jennings, K. Sycara and M. Wooldridge , A roadmap of agent research and development, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 1 (1) (1998) 7–38. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 64. T. Elkins and R. T. Keller , Leadership in research and development organizations: A literature review and conceptual framework, The Leadership Quarterly 14 (4) (2003) 587–606. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 65. R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny , The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6) (1986) 1173. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 66. D. Muller, C. M. Judd and V. Y. Yzerbyt , When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89 (6) (2005) 852. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 67. J. R. Edwards and L. S. Lambert , Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis, Psychological Methods 12 (1) (2007) 1. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 68. K. J. Preacher, D. D. Rucker and A. F. Hayes , Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions, Multivariate Behavioral Research 42 (1) (2007) 185–227. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 69. F. G. Gilal, R. G. Gilal, J. Zhang, R. G. Gilal and N. G. Gilal , Supply Chain management practices as a contemporary source of securing competitive advantage and organizational performance: Evidence from the FMCGs of Pakistan, International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management 8 (3), in press. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 70. A. Ghosh, S. Das and A. Deshpande , Effect of responsiveness and process integration in supply chain coordination, IUP Journal of Supply Chain Management 11 (1) (2014) 7. Google Scholar
    • 71. G. Seebacher and H. Winkler , A capability approach to evaluate supply chain flexibility, International Journal of Production Economics 167 (2015) 177–186. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 72. K. Fantazy and M. Salem , The value of strategy and flexibility in new product development: The impact on performance, Journal of Enterprise Information Management 29 (4) (2016) 525–548. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 73. S. Tyagi, A. Choudhary, X. Cai and K. Yang , Value stream mapping to reduce the lead-time of a product development process, International Journal of Production Economics 160 (2015) 202–212. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 74. R. G. Cooper , Predevelopment activities determine new product success, Industrial Marketing Management 17 (3) (1988) 237–247. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 75. W. Chang and S. A. Taylor , The effectiveness of customer participation in new product development: A meta-analysis, Journal of Marketing 80 (1) (2016) 47–64. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 76. K. Talke and E. J. Hultink , Managing diffusion barriers when launching new products, Journal of Product Innovation Management 27 (4) (2010) 537–553. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 77. S. H. Kim and S. Netessine , Collaborative cost reduction and component procurement under information asymmetry, Management Science 59 (1) (2013) 189–206. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 78. R. Eltantawy, A. Paulraj, L. Giunipero, D. Naslund and A. A. Thute , Towards supply chain coordination and productivity in a three echelon supply chain: Action research study, International Journal of Operations and Production Management 35 (6) (2015) 895–924. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 79. S. B. Aissa and M. Goaied , Determinants of Tunisian hotel profitability: The role of managerial efficiency, Tourism Management 52 (2016) 478–487. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 80. E. Bayraktar, M. Demirbag, S. L. Koh, E. Tatoglu and H. Zaim , A causal analysis of the impact of information systems and supply chain management practices on operational performance: Evidence from manufacturing SMEs in Turkey, International Journal of Production Economics 122 (1) (2009) 133–149. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 81. E. Bayraktar, A. Gunasekaran, S. L. Koh, E. Tatoglu, M. Demirbag and S. Zaim , An efficiency comparison of supply chain management and information systems practices: A study of Turkish and Bulgarian small-and medium-sized enterprises in food products and beverages, International Journal of Production Research 48 (2) (2010) 425–451. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 82. S. M. Ebrahimi, Examining the impact of supply chain integration on organization structure and operational performance in oil and gas supply chains: A contingency approach, Doctoral dissertation, University of Sheffield (2015). Google Scholar
    • 83. J. D. Thompson , Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (Transaction Publishers, 1967). Google Scholar
    • 84. D. R. Dalton, W. D. Todor, M. J. Spendolini, G. J. Fielding and L. W. Porter , Organization structure and performance: A critical review, Academy of Management Review 5 (1) (1980) 49–64. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 85. N. Erhardt, C. Martin-Rios and J. Harkins , Knowledge flow from the top: The importance of teamwork structure in team sports, European Sport Management Quarterly 14 (4) (2014) 375–396. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 86. R. Germain, C. Claycomb and C. Dröge , Supply chain variability, organizational structure, and performance: The moderating effect of demand unpredictability, Journal of Operations Management 26 (5) (2008) 557–570. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 87. Q. Yinan, M. Tang and M. Zhang , Mass customization in flat organization: The mediating role of supply chain planning and corporation coordination, Journal of Applied Research and Technology 12 (2) (2014) 171–181. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 88. X. A. Koufteros and M. A. Vonderembse , The impact of organizational structure on the level of JIT attainment: Towards theory development, International Journal of Production Research 36 (10) (1998) 2863–2878. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 89. A. Y. Nahm, M. A. Vonderembse and X. A. Koufteros , The impact of organizational structure on time-based manufacturing and plant performance, Journal of Operations Management 21 (3) (2003) 281–306. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 90. F. C. Lunenburg , Organizational structure: Mintzberg’s framework, International Journal of Scholarly, Academic, Intellectual Diversity 14 (1) (2012) 1–8. Google Scholar
    • 91. D. Baumann-Pauly, C. Wickert, L. J. Spence and A. G. Scherer , Organizing corporate social responsibility in small and large firms: Size matters, Journal of Business Ethics 115 (4) (2013) 693–705. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 92. R. W. Griffin , Fundamentals of Management (Cengage Learning, 2013). Google Scholar
    • 93. A. M. Townsend, S. M. DeMarie and A. R. Hendrickson , Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future, The Academy of Management Executive 12 (3) (1998) 17–29. Google Scholar
    • 94. P. K. Humphreys, M. K. Lai and D. Sculli , An inter-organizational information system for supply chain management, International Journal of Production Economics 70 (3) (2001) 245–255. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 95. A. Paulraj, A. A. Lado and I. J. Chen , Inter-organizational communication as a relational competency: Antecedents and performance outcomes in collaborative buyer–supplier relationships, Journal of Operations Management 26 (1) (2008) 45–64. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 96. S. Gold, S. Seuring and P. Beske , Sustainable supply chain management and inter-organizational resources: A literature review, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 17 (4) (2010) 230–245. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 97. R. Rajaguru and M. J. Matanda , Effects of inter-organizational compatibility on supply chain capabilities: Exploring the mediating role of inter-organizational information systems (IOIS) integration, Industrial Marketing Management 42 (4) (2013) 620–632. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 98. J. M. Denolf, J. H. Trienekens, P. N. Wognum, J. G. van der Vorst and S. O. Omta , Towards a framework of critical success factors for implementing supply chain information systems, Computers in Industry 68 (2015) 16–26. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 99. X. Zhang, D. P. Van Donk and T. van der Vaart , The different impact of inter-organizational and intra-organizational ICT on suppy chain performance, International Journal of Operations and Production Management 36 (7) (2016) 803–824. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 100. P. Arlow and M. J. Gannon , Social responsiveness, corporate structure, and economic performance, Academy of Management Review 7 (2) (1982) 235–241. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 101. M. Perez-Valls, J. Cespedes-Lorente and J. Moreno-Garcia , Green practices and organizational design as sources of strategic flexibility and performance, Business Strategy and the Environment (2015), doi: 10.1002/bse.1881. Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 102. J. Y. Lee, I. V. Kozlenkova and R. W. Palmatier , Structural marketing: Using organizational structure to achieve marketing objectives, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 43 (1) (2015) 73–99. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 103. E. A. Hoşgör , Organizational structure, Wiley Encyclopedia of Management 6 (2015) 1–6. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 104. J. Joseph, R. Klingebiel and A. J. Wilson , Organizational structure and performance feedback: Centralization, aspirations, and termination decisions, Organization Science 27 (5) (2016) 1065–1083. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 105. I. Garbie , Management for sustainability, in Sustainability in Manufacturing Enterprise (Springer International Publishing, 2016), pp. 81–89. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 106. M. Holweg, S. Disney, J. Holmström and J. Småros , Supply chain collaboration: Making sense of the strategy continuum, European Management Journal 23 (2) (2005) 170–181. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 107. R. R. Lummus, L. K. Duclos and R. J. Vokurka , Supply chain flexibility: Building a new model, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management 4 (4) (2003) 1–13. Google Scholar
    • 108. C. Liu, B. Huo, S. Liu and X. Zhao , Effect of information sharing and process coordination on logistics outsourcing, Industrial Management and Data Systems 115 (1) (2015) 41–63. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 109. J. G. van der Vorst, R. Ossevoort, M. de Keizer, T. van Woensel, C. N. Verdouw, E. Wenink and R. van Willegen , DAVINC3I: Towards collaborative responsive logistics networks in floriculture, in Logistics and Supply Chain Innovation (Springer International Publishing, 2016), pp. 37–53. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 110. M. M. P. Marchesini and R. L. C. Alcântara , Logistics activities in supply chain business process: A conceptual framework to guide their implementation, The International Journal of Logistics Management 27 (1) (2016) 6–30. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 111. T. Yan, T. Y. Choi, Y. Kim and Y. Yang , A theory of the nexus supplier: A critical supplier from a network perspective, Journal of Supply Chain Management 51 (1) (2015) 52–66. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 112. P. Y. Chu, K. H. Chang and H. F. Huang , How to increase supplier flexibility through social mechanisms and influence strategies? Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing 27 (2) (2012) 115–131. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 113. L. E. Gadde, H. Håkansson and G. Persson , Supply Network Strategies (John Wiley and Sons, 2010). Google Scholar
    • 114. A. A. Thatte, V. Agrawal and S. Muhammed , Linking information sharing and supplier network responsiveness with delivery dependability of a firm, Journal of Applied Business Research 25 (3) (2011) 37–56. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 115. Y. Kuo, T. Yang, D. Parker and C. H. Sung , Integration of customer and supplier flexibility in a make-to-order industry, Industrial Management and Data Systems 116 (2) (2016) 213–235. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 116. F. M. Armbrecht Jr , Industrial research institute’s 3rd annual R&D leader board: R&D Spending by the Top 100 US technology investors in 2000, Research-Technology Management 45 (1) (2002) 21. Google Scholar
    • 117. D. M. Kim and G. D. Lee , Introduction to the technology, applications, products, markets, R&D, and perspectives of nanofoods in the food industry, Nanotechnology 25 (2006) 32–38. Google Scholar
    • 118. M. Song and R. J. Thieme , A cross-national investigation of the R&D–marketing interface in the product innovation process, Industrial Marketing Management 35 (3) (2006) 308–322. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 119. M. A. Schilling and C. W. Hill , Managing the new product development process: Strategic imperatives, The Academy of Management Executive 12 (3) (1998) 67–81. Google Scholar
    • 120. L. Aarikka-Stenroos and B. Sandberg , From new-product development to commercialization through networks, Journal of Business Research 65 (2) (2012) 198–206. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 121. A. Griffin and J. R. Hauser , The voice of the customer, Marketing Science 12 (1) (1993) 1–27. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 122. N. Fain, N. Moes and J. Duhovnik , The role of the user and the society in new product development, Strojniški vestnik-Journal of Mechanical Engineering 56 (7–8) (2010) 513–522. Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 123. W. M. Vagias, Likert-type scale response anchors, Clemson International Institute for Tourism & Research Development, Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management. Clemson University (2006). Google Scholar
    • 124. J. F. Perry, The impact of supply chain management business processes on competitive advantage and organizational performance, Doctoral dissertation, Air Force Institute of Technology (2012). Google Scholar
    • 125. J. F. Hair, R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham and W. C. Black , Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th edn. (Prentice Hall International, NY, 1998). Google Scholar
    • 126. B. M. Byrne , Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument, International Journal of Testing 1 (1) (2001) 55–86. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 127. K. G. Jöreskog and D. Sörbom , LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications (SPSS, 1989). Google Scholar
    • 128. J. C. Anderson and D. W. Gerbing , Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin 103 (3) (1988) 411. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 129. L. A. Aroian , The probability function of the product of two normally distributed variables, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 18 (2) (1947) 265–271. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 130. X. Huang, M. M. Kristal and R. G. Schroeder , The impact of organizational structure on mass customization capability: A contingency view, Production and Operations Management 19 (5) (2010) 515–530. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 131. N. J. Foss, J. Lyngsie and S. A. Zahra , Organizational design correlates of entrepreneurship: The roles of decentralization and formalization for opportunity discovery and realization, Strategic Organization (2014), doi: 10.1177/1476127014561944. Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 132. M. G. Jacobides , The inherent limits of organizational structure and the unfulfilled role of hierarchy: Lessons from a near-war, Organization Science 18 (3) (2007) 455–477. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
    • 133. J. R. Galbraith , Designing Complex Organizations (Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc, 1973). Google Scholar
    • 134. A. K. Gupta, S. P. Raj and D. Wilemon , A model for studying R&D. Marketing interface in the product innovation process, The Journal of Marketing 50 (2) (1986) 7–17. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar