The Reinvention of Science Slaying the Dragons of Dogma and Ignorance by Bernard J T Jones, Vicent J Martínez & Virginia L Trimble "A fascinating tour through the history of science and the sometimes irrational behavior of supposedly rational scientists, by three people who write well and understand what they are writing about." Jim Peebles
Professor emeritus, Princeton University Nobel Prize in Physics (2019) |
Nobel Prizes Genes, Viruses and Cellular Signaling by Erling Norrby "In this, the fifth in a series of volumes, Erling Norrby takes us on an in-depth tour of the documents and the underlying science for the 1969 to 1971 Nobel prizes in physiology or medicine. Elucidating both the scientific discoveries themselves, as well as the evaluations by the committee, often over a period of some years, we learn about the identification of fundamental biological processes such as the replication and genetic structure of viruses (1969), the release, storage and inactivation of neurotransmitters (1970) and a general mechanism of hormone action (1971)..." Robert J Lefkowitz
Nobel laureate in Chemistry, 2012 |
The Road to Scientific Success: Inspiring Life Stories of Prominent Researchers
The books published in this series deal with the public communication of science, i.e. with communication of and about science involving non-scientists and taking place in the public sphere. Possible topics include public communication of scientific knowledge, communication about scientific projects or research fields, and communication about science as a social system and its interdependencies with the larger society. |
Exploring Complexity
For four centuries our sciences have progressed by looking at its objects of study in a reductionist manner. In contrast complexity science, that has been evolving during the last 30-40 years, seeks to look at its objects of study from the bottom up, seeing them as systems of interacting elements that form, change, and evolve over time. Complexity therefore is not so much a subject of research as a way of looking at systems. It is inherently interdisciplinary, meaning that it gets its problems from the real non-disciplinary world and its energy and ideas from all fields of science, at the same time affecting each of these fields. |