World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.
https://doi.org/10.1142/9781800614079_0008Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)
Abstract:

Crowdsourcing volunteer research can enable open source investigations to proceed more quickly, cheaply and effectively. Public contributions to larger research projects have proven able to provide positive outcomes in achieving transparency and justice to crimes and wrongdoing. However, they can also be the route to inaccurate findings and subsequent destructive mob justice. This chapter explores both the benefits of crowdsourcing and its dark side. After considering the elements of a productive crowdsourcing effort, it will examine the rise of the QAnon movement and how it was able to thrive, culminating in the 6 January 2021 US Capitol Hill riot. The movement used many techniques nearly identical to benign open source research projects. While there are limits to how far damaging applications can be restrained, methodological differences provide lessons about how best to conduct crowdsourcing so that it generates reliable findings while also guarding against harmful trends.