World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×
Spring Sale: Get 35% off with a min. purchase of 2 titles. Use code SPRING35. Valid till 31st Mar 2025.

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

Chapter 14: Technologies and Student Feedback Collection and Analysis

    https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811285622_0014Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)
    Abstract:

    Technology-enabled feedback encompasses many significant features including AI. It also allows students greater flexibility in providing feedback, and the university/institute enables them to make data-driven decisions as the collected data are free from bias and data analyses are accurate. There are different technology-centric feedback collections such as Open edX Insight, speech-to-text, Kahoot, Dialogflow, and so on. These technology-centric feedback collections mean collecting more realistic data from the students. Both qualitative and quantitative data could be analyzed by applying technology-centric data analyses tools. AMOS, LABLEAU, SAS, SPSS, Stata, Statista, XLSTAT, and ROOT are a few of the quantitative data analyses software, and Atlas, Airtable, Coda, Condens, MaxQDA, Notion, and NVivo are a few of the qualitative data analyses software. To make the students’ feedback and survey more successful we recommend sharing survey methods/survey questions with other educational institutions, conducting broader surveys, broad topics to ask questions on, technology-based analysis of qualitative feedback comments, and including skills development-focused questions.