World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

An Experimental Charge Density Study of the Effect of the Noncentric Crystal Field on the Molecular Properties of Organic NLO Materials

    The authors thank Dr. S. N. Ghanshyam Acharya for the synthesis of dicarbonitrile derivatives 2–4.

    https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812835734_0049Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)
    Abstract:

    The structure, packing, and charge distribution in molecules of nonlinear optical materials have been analysed with reference to their counterparts in centrosymmetric structures based on low temperature X-ray measurements. The systems studied are the centric and noncentric polymorphs of 5-nitrouracil as well as the diamino, dithio, and thioamino derivatives of 1,1-ethylenedicarbonitrile; the latter possesses a noncentric structure. The molecular structure of 5-nitrouracil is invariant between the two forms, while the crystal packing is considerably different, leading to dimeric NHO rings in the centric polymorph and linear chains in noncentric one. There is an additional CHO contact in the centric form with a significant overlap of the electrostatic potentials between the alkenyl hydrogen atom and an oxygen atom of the nitro group. The dipole moment of 5-nitrouracil in the noncentric form is much higher (μ=9 D) than in the centric form (≈6 D). Among the 1,1-ethylenedicarbonitriles, there is an increased charge separation in the noncentric thioamino derivative, leading to an enhanced dipole of 15 D compared to the centric diamino (5 D) and dithio (6 D) derivatives. The effect of the crystal field is borne out by semiempirical AM1 calculations on the two systems. Dipole moments calculated for the molecules in the frozen geometries match closely with those abtained fro centric crystals from the experimental charge densities. The calculated values of the dipole moment in the frozen or optimized geometries in the noncentric structures are, however, considerably lower than the observed value. Furthermore, the conformation of the SCH3, group in the noncentric crystal is anti with respect to the central C=C bond while the syn conformation is anti with respect to the central C=C bond while the syn conformation is predicted for the free molecule in the optimized geometry.