World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

CHAPTER 5: INDUSTRIES, DISTRIBUTION, LOGISTIC

      https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813271081_0005Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)
      Abstract:

      The agribusiness system no longer really has a center, or origin, as the “primary” nature of production might suggest. Rather, it reveals multiple sequences of companies of all sizes; the link with production is, however, an obligation, a must. We have just seen that agribusiness cooperatives are an impetus for agro-production and that, conversely, very large firms are concerned about the permanence of their link with production. In the first case, agribusiness is a “raison d’être”; not in the second, where it is, however, a sine qua non condition, as long as the object of the firm remains food (this point is not a detail: Danone is the result of successive transformations of BSN, operators in the glass, whose strategy was for a moment, from the container to the contents, from the glass to the beer, then to the agriculture production in general, which is not quite the case anymore today). In addition, companies that absolutely need agribusiness are very diverse in size and influence over their agricultural supplier, sometimes confined to the role of subcontractors (but cooperatives have agro-production subsidiary). We will explore this part of the agribusiness system in depth in this chapter…