World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

A Fossil Controversy

      https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814436137_0017Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)
      Abstract:

      It would be difficult to continue my story without reference to a strange development in 1983 when Fred was cheated of a Nobel Prize. There is little doubt, even in the minds of his arch enemies, that his work on the origin of the elements in the 1940's and 1950's constitutes a monumental contribution to science. I have mentioned earlier that theory of nucleogenesis (the synthesis of elements in the hot interiors of stars) was an outstanding scientific landmark of the 1950's, and Fred's role as leader and pioneer of this entire venture is beyond question. Fred's early calculations had shown that in order for carbon to be produced in adequate quantities in stars the nucleus of the carbon atom had to possess an excited state, and precisely this level was later discovered in the laboratory by Willy Fowler and a Bob Whaling. In the further development of the theory he collaborated with Willy Fowler and with Geoffrey and Margaret Burbidge in the mid-1950's. In their classic paper B2FH the four authors published a comprehensive account of stellar nucleosynthesis that remained a cardinal influence in astronomy over many decades…