World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

1: About Science 1: Basics—Knowledge, Nature, Science and Scimat

    https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814472937_0001Cited by:1 (Source: Crossref)
    Abstract:

    There is a lot of confusion and misconception concerning Science. The nature and contents of science is an unsettled problem. For example, Thales of 2,600 years ago is recognized as the “Father of Science” but the word science was introduced only in the 14th century, and so it is obvious wrong if science is understood as modern science only, which started with Galileo about 400 years ago. If science is mainly about nonliving systems, then social science cannot be part of science. And if social science is part of science, then why the humanities, which are also about humans, are not part of science? All these confusions and dilemmas concerning science could be traced to the historical evolution of the word and concept of Science and the many misconceptions perpetuated by various philosophers and historians of science, due to the lack of an agreed-upon definition of science. This chapter aims to clear up all these confusions by retracing the historical development of science—the word, concept and practice. The nature of knowledge, Nature, religion and philosophy are covered. A simple definition of science according to scimat, the new discipline that treats all human-dependent matters as part of science, is provided. Three important lessons learned about science, including the required Reality Check (which differentiates science from other forms of knowledge) are given. Important ramifications from this definition concerning antiscience and pseudoscience in particular are discussed.