World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

Reversibility vs. Irreversibility

      https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814503150_0012Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)
      Abstract:

      The seeming paradox of reversible underlying dynamics leading to irreversible macroscopic behavior has been wrestled with since the time of Boltzmann. For the case of gas dynamics, Boltzmann derived his famous equation on the basis of the questionable statistical assumption of “Stosszahlansatz”. From the Boltzmann equation one may derive the “H theorem” which says that the time derivative of the entropy is greater than or equal to zero. The “Stosszahlansatz” or “molecular chaos assumption” says that the probability distributions for colliding molecules should be uncorrelated. As has been pointed out many times (see for example: pp. 46-88 of [Chapman and Cowling, 1958] and pp. 28-32 of the Statistical Physics volume in [Landau and Lifshitz, 1960-1981]), because the underlying dynamics is reversible, for every state with its entropy increasing, there is a corresponding state with its entropy decreasing. In fact, one may show from this argument that the stosszahlansatz can hold only when the time derivative of entropy is zero. There is no intrinsically special direction in time: If one starts with a random state with low entropy, the entropy increases if one follows the evolution of the state either backwards or forwards in time. There are many more states with high entropy than low, and so a system is likely to be in a high entropy state regardless of the time…