Proceedings of the 27th Symposium on PIXE in Japan (The 18th Annual Meeting of the Japan Society for Particle Induced X-ray Emission (PIXE) Research)No Access

FLUORIDE UPTAKE INTO HUMAN TEETH FROM A FLUORIDE-RELEASING THIN LAYER AFTER A LONG PERIOD OF FILLING

HIROKO YAMAMOTO

Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontology, Graduate School of Dentistry, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan

Search for more papers by this author

YUKITERU IWAMI

Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontology, Graduate School of Dentistry, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan

Search for more papers by this author

SIGEYUKI EBISU

Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontology, Graduate School of Dentistry, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan

Search for more papers by this author

HISANORI KOMATSU

Graduate School of Dental Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8586, Japan

Search for more papers by this author

MASAHARU NOMACHI

Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan

Search for more papers by this author

YORIHITO SUGAYA

Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan

Search for more papers by this author

, and

KEISUKE YASUDA

The Wakasa Wan Energy Research Center, Tsuruga, Fukui 914-0192, Japan

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129083511002136Cited by:4 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

Fluoride (F) distribution in human teeth was measured using an in-air micro-PIGE and micro-PIXE system. Class V cavities in the extracted teeth were prepared with Fluoro-Bond Shake One to provide a thin layer of an F-releasing material (FRM). The cavities were then filled with Beautifil Flow F10 (FRM, Group I) or LITE FIL IIP (non-FRM, Group II). Following a four-year period, specimens were cut longitudinally perpendicular to the cavity floor. The F distribution was measured at the floor of the cut surface. The position including 90% of the intact Ca level was defined as the wall surface. Based on this demarcation, indices of F distribution (surface F concentration and F penetration depth) were determined. Thickness of FRM thin layers varied (≈339 μm) and did not affect F distribution. Both values of F distribution indices in Group I [821–8763 (mean 3797) ppm, 34–668 (mean 241) μm] were significantly larger than those in Group II [0–7064 (mean 1865) ppm, 0–143 (mean 21) μm]. The F distribution in Group I was affected more by the filling material than by the FRM thin layer during the four-year exposure. Methodologies using this system may give insightful information for the development of new dental materials.

Keywords:

References

K. W. Stephen, Acta Odontol. Scand. 57, 352 (1999), DOI: 10.1080/000163599428616. Web of Science, Google Scholar
J. Hickset al., J. Calif. Dent. Assoc. 31, 229 (2003). Google Scholar
V. Quistet al., Int. Dent. J. 60, 156 (2010). Web of Science, Google Scholar
A. Wiegand, W. Buchalla and T. Attin, Dent. Mater. 23, 343 (2007). Web of Science, Google Scholar
F. M. Burke, H. J. Ray and R. J. McConnell, Int. Dent. J. 56, 33 (2006). Web of Science, Google Scholar
H. G. McCane, Arch. Oral Biol. 13, 475 (1968). Web of Science, Google Scholar
A. B. Tveit and B. Tötdal, Acta Odontol. Scand. 39, 107 (1981), DOI: 10.3109/00016358109162268. Web of Science, Google Scholar
C. Bruun and H. Givskov, Caries Res. 27, 96 (1993), DOI: 10.1159/000261524. Web of Science, Google Scholar
R. J. Erickson and E. A. Glasspoole, Adv. Dent. Res. 9, 315 (1995). Google Scholar
L. Han, M. Fukushima and T. Okiji, Jpn. J. Conserv. Dent. 53, 502 (2010). Google Scholar
T. Sakaiet al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 136–138, 390 (1998). Web of Science, Google Scholar
T. Sakaiet al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 190, 271 (2002), DOI: 10.1016/S0168-583X(02)00469-X. Web of Science, Google Scholar
H. Yamamotoet al., JAERI-Review 2002-035, 258 (2002). Google Scholar
H. Yamamotoet al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 210, 388 (2003), DOI: 10.1016/S0168-583X(03)01039-5. Web of Science, Google Scholar
H. Yamamotoet al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 231, 300 (2005). Web of Science, Google Scholar
K. Yasudaet al., Nucl. Instr. Methods B 260, 207 (2007). Web of Science, Google Scholar
H. Komatsuet al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 260, 201 (2007). Web of Science, Google Scholar
H. Yamamotoet al., Int. J. PIXE 19, 91 (2009). Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
P. R. Walshaw and D. McComb, Quintessence Int. 27, 619 (1996). Google Scholar
E. Swift Jr., Pediatr. Dent. 20, 80 (1998). Google Scholar
J. Perdigão, Dent. Mater. 26, 24 (2010), DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.149. Web of Science, Google Scholar
H. Yamamotoet al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 260, 194 (2007). Web of Science, Google Scholar
M. J. Altenburgeret al., Caries Res. 42, 312 (2008), DOI: 10.1159/000148164. Web of Science, Google Scholar
R. A. Exterkate, J. J. Damen and J. M. ten Cate, Caries Res. 39, 509 (2005), DOI: 10.1159/000088188. Web of Science, Google Scholar
M. A. Buzalafet al., J. Appl. Oral Sci. 18, 316 (2010). Web of Science, Google Scholar