World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

Showroom Deployment with Consumers’ Anticipated Regret

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217595924400189Cited by:1 (Source: Crossref)
    This article is part of the issue:

    In conjunction with the online sales channel, an increasing number of manufacturers are launching showrooms to address consumer fit uncertainty. Our study examines showroom deployment by manufacturers under two scenarios: manufacturer-operated showroom and showroom-operated in collaboration with an independent operator. We consider two types of consumers’ anticipated regret — “mismatch regret” and “high-cost regret” — and develop two game models wherein either the manufacturer or the independent operator determines the optimal pricing strategies. From the derived equilibria, we obtain three key findings: (1) Regardless of whether the showroom is launched by the manufacturer or an independent operator, there are two pricing strategies: unified pricing when the return cost for consumers is relatively low and differential pricing when the cost is high. (2) Under the differential pricing strategy, the optimal price in the showroom increases with the intensity of consumers’ mismatch regret and decreases with the intensity of consumers’ high-cost regret. Moreover, a showroom that collaborates with an independent operator induces a lower price in the showroom than under the scenario of a manufacturer-operated showroom. (3) Consumers’ mismatch regret has a promoting effect on showroom deployment.