Plenary Session XIII – Chair: T. GoldmanNo Access

HYBRID AND CONVENTIONAL BARYONS IN THE FLUX-TUBE AND QUARK MODELS

PHILIP R. PAGE

Theoretical Division, MS B283, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X05023347Cited by:3 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

The status of conventional baryon flux-tubes and hybrid baryons is reviewed. Recent surprises are that a model prediction indicates that hybrid baryons are very weakly produced in glue-rich Ψ decays, and an analysis of electro-production data concludes that the Roper resonance is not a hybrid baryon. The baryon decay flux-tube overlap has been calculated in the flux-tube model, and is discussed here. The behavior of the overlap follows naïve expectations.

Keywords:

You currently do not have access to the full text article.
Recommend the journal to your library today!

References

T. Barnes , COSY Workshop on Baryon Excitations , arXiv:nucl-th/0009011 . Google Scholar
P. R. Page , Proc. of the 9th International Conference on the Structure of Baryons (BARYONS 2002) , arXiv:nucl-th/0204031 . Google Scholar
T. T. Takahashi, H. Matsufuru, Y. Nemoto and H. Suganuma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 18 (2001); Phys. Rev. 65, 114509 (2002); C. Alexandrou, P. de Forcrand and O. Jahn, Nucl. Phys. (Proc. Suppl.) 119, 667 (2003) . Google Scholar
F. Okiharu and R. M. Woloshyn, Nucl. Phys. (Proc. Suppl.) 129, 745 (2004). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
V. G. Bornyakov et al. (DIK Collab.) , arXiv:hep-lat/0401026 . Google Scholar
T. T. Takahashi and H. Suganuma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 182001 (2003), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.182001. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
S. Capstick and P. R. Page, Phys. Rev. C 66, 065204 (2002), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.66.065204. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
L. S. Kisslinger, Phys. Rev. D 69, 054015 (2004), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.054015. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
J. Z. Bai et al. (BES Collab.), Phys. Lett. B510, 75 (2001); M. Ablikim et al. (BES Collab.) , arXiv:hep-ex/0405030 . Google Scholar
R. G. Ping, H. C. Chiang and B. S. Zou, Nucl. Phys. A 743, 149 (2004), DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.07.004. Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
I. G. Aznauryan et al.; V. D. Burkert, these proceedings , arXiv:nucl-th/0407021 . Google Scholar
N. Dowrick, J. Paton and S. J. Perantonis, J. Phys. G 13, 423 (1987), DOI: 10.1088/0305-4616/13/4/005. Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
R. Kokoski and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 35, 907 (1987), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.35.907. Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
N. Isgur and J. Paton, Phys. Rev. D 31, 2910 (1985), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.31.2910. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar