Parallel Session A2 – Chair: D. RebreyendNo Access

IS SHORT-RANGE REALLY IMPORTANT?

M. STENMARK

Department of Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 535, S-75121, Uppsala, Sweden

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X0502344XCited by:1 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

The reaction NN→NNη is revisited and in particular the short-range mechanism is investigated. It is found that this particular mechanism has a small contribution in contradiction to what was found by earlier investigations.

You currently do not have access to the full text article.
Recommend the journal to your library today!

References

M. T. Peña, H. Garcilazo and D. O. Riska, Nucl. Phys. A 683, 322 (2001), arXiv:nucl-th/0006011. Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
M. Stenmark, "The NN → NNη reaction revisited," submitted for publication, TSL/ISV-2004-0284 . Google Scholar
G. Fäldt and C. Wilkin, Phys. Scripta 64, 427 (2001), arXiv:nucl-th/0104081. Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
F. Hibou et al., "Comparison of eta and eta' production in the pp → ppη(η′) reactions near threshold," Phys. Lett. B 438 (1998) 41; P. Moskal et al., "Energy dependence of the near-threshold total cross-section for the pp → ppη′ reaction," Phys. Lett. B 474 (2000) 416; H. Calen et al., "The pp → ppη reaction near the kinematical threshold," Phys. Lett. B 366 (1996) 39 . Google Scholar

Vol. 20, No. 08n09

Metrics

Downloaded 15 times

History

PDF download

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

IS SHORT-RANGE REALLY IMPORTANT?

Abstract

Recommended