ExperimentNo Access

Conceptual design studies for a CEPC detector

S. V. Chekanov

HEP Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL 60439, USA

E-mail Address: chekanov@anl.gov

Search for more papers by this author

and

M. Demarteau

HEP Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL 60439, USA

E-mail Address: demarteau@anl.gov

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X16440218Cited by:3 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

The physics potential of the Circular Electron Positron Collider (CEPC) can be significantly strengthened by two detectors with complementary designs. A promising detector approach based on the Silicon Detector (SiD) designed for the International Linear Collider (ILC) is presented. Several simplifications of this detector for the lower energies expected at the CEPC are proposed. A number of cost optimizations of this detector are illustrated using full detector simulations. We show that the proposed changes will enable one to reach the physics goals at the CEPC.

Keywords:

PACS: 13.66.-a, 13.66.Jn

You currently do not have access to the full text article.
Recommend the journal to your library today!

References

1. H. Aihara et al., SiD Letter of Intent, presented to ILC IDAG, arXiv:0911.0006 [physics.ins-det]. Google Scholar
2. C. Adolphsen et al., The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report — Vol. 3, II: Accelerator Baseline Design, arXiv:1306.6328 [physics.acc-ph]. Google Scholar
3. H. Abramowicz et al., The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report — Vol. 4: Detectors, arXiv:1306.6329 [physics.ins-det]. Google Scholar
4. M. J. Charles, PFA performance for SiD, in Proc. Int. Linear Collider Workshop, LCWS08 and Int. Linear Collider Meeting, ILC08, Chicago, USA, 16–20 November 2008 (2009), arXiv:0901.4670 [physics.data-an]. Google Scholar
5. J. S. Marshall and M. A. Thomson, Pandora particle flow algorithm, in Proc. Int. Conf. on Calorimetry for the High Energy Frontier (CHEF 2013) (2013), pp. 305–315, arXiv:1308.4537 [physics.ins-det]. Google Scholar
6. N. Graf and J. McCormick, AIP Conf. Proc. 867, 503 (2006). Google Scholar
7. OPAL Collab. (K. Ahmet et al.), Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 305, 275 (1991). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
8. S. Chekanov, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2015, 136093 (2015), available at http://atlaswww.hep.anl.gov/hepsim/. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P. Z. Skands, J. High Energy Phys. 0605, 26 (2006). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
10. R. Pordes et al., J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 78, 012057 (2007). Google Scholar
11. JADE Collab. (W. Bartel et al.), Phys. Lett. B 123, 460 (1993). Google Scholar
12. Y. L. Dokshitzer, J. Phys. G 17, 1537 (1991), Contribution in Report of the Hard QCD Working Group, in Proc. Workshop on Jet Studies at LEP and HERA, Durham, December (1990). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar