Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/CommonHTML/jax.js
World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

Quantum fluctuations, particles and entanglement: A discussion towards the solution of the quantum measurement problems

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X22501135Cited by:6 (Source: Crossref)

    The quantum measurement problems are revisited from a new perspective. One of the main ideas of this work is that the basic entities of our world are various types of particles, elementary or composite. It follows that each elementary process, hence each measurement process at its core, is a space–time, pointlike, event. Another key idea is that, when a microsystem ψ gets into contact with the experimental device, factorization of ψ rapidly fails and entangled mixed states appear. The wave functions for the microsystem-apparatus coupled systems for different measurement outcomes then lack overlapping space–time support. It means that the aftermath of each measurement is a single term in the sum: a “wave function collapse.”

    Our discussion leading to a diagonal density matrix, ρ=diag(|c1|2,,|cn|2,) shows how the information encoded in the wave function |ψ=ncn|n gets transcribed, via entanglement with the experimental device and environment, into the relative frequencies 𝒫n=|cn|2 for various experimental results F=fn.

    These results represent the first, significant steps towards filling in the logical gaps in the standard interpretation based on Born’s rule, and replacing it with a more natural one. Accepting objective reality of quantum fluctuations, independent of any experiments, and independently of human presence, one renounces the idea that in a fundamental, complete theory of Nature the result of each single experiment must necessarily be predictable.

    A few well-known puzzles such as the Schrödinger cat conundrum and the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) paradox are briefly reviewed: they can all be naturally explained away.

    Dedicated to the memory of Giampiero Paffuti, who left us after this work was submitted to the ArXiv.

    PACS: 03.65.−w
    You currently do not have access to the full text article.

    Recommend the journal to your library today!