Research PapersNo Access

ENTANGLEMENT SWAPPING AND CONCENTRATION IN THE TWO-PHOTON JAYNES-CUMMINGS MODEL

Key Laboratory of Optical and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Department of Physics, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, People's Republic of China

Search for more papers by this author

and

JIN-MING LIU

Key Laboratory of Optical and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Department of Physics, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, People's Republic of China

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979207037387Cited by:2 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

We propose a scheme for entanglement swapping and entanglement concentration without joint measurement by using the two-photon Jaynes-Cummings model. In the scheme, we can generate a maximally entangled pair between two initially uncorrelated atoms or cavities. Furthermore, the entangled state between two cavities is found to be a photon entanglement of two photons in one cavity and zero in another cavity.

Keywords:

PACS: 03.67-a, 03.67.Lx, 42.50.Dv

You currently do not have access to the full text article.
Recommend the journal to your library today!

References

A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
J. S. Bell, Physics 1, 195 (1964). Crossref, Google Scholar
C. H. Bennettet al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
P. G. Kwiatet al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4337 (1995). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
S. B. Zheng and G. C. Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2392 (2000). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
C. H. Bennett and S. J. Wiesner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2881 (1992). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
A. K. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
E. S. Guerra and J. C. Retamal, J. Mod. Opt. 46, 295 (1999). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
X. B. Zou and W. Mathis, Phys. Rev. A 72, 013809 (2005). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Q. A. Turchetteet al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3631 (1998). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
J. M. Raimond, M. Brune and S. Haroche, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 565 (2001). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
E. Hagleyet al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1 (1997). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
S. Osnaghiet al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 037902 (2001). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
A. Rauschenbeutelet al., Science 288, 2024 (2001). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
S. J. Freedman and J. S. Clauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 938 (1972). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
J. G. Rarity and P. R. Tapster, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2495 (1990). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
M. Lamehi-Rachti and W. Mittig, Phys. Rev. D 14, 2543 (1976). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
M. Zukowskiet al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4287 (1993). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
J. W. Panet al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3891 (1998). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
X. B. Wanget al., Phys. Rev. A 69, 014303 (2004). Crossref, Google Scholar
S. Bose, V. Vedral and P. L. Knight, Phy. Rev. A 60, 194 (1999). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
S. B. Zheng, Phys. Rev. A 69, 064302 (2004). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
M. Yang, W. Song and Z. L. Cao, Phys. Rev. A 71, 034312 (2005). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
R. R. Puri and R. K. Bullough, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 5, 2021 (1988). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
H. T. Dung and N. D. Huyen, Phys. Rev. A 49, 473 (1994). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
P. Zhou and J. S. Peng, Phys. Rev. A 44, 3331 (1991). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
T. Nasreen and K. Zaheer, Phys. Rev. A 49, 616 (1994). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
A. Rauschenbeutelet al., Phys. Rev. A 64, 050301 (2001). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar