Research PapersNo Access

Spiral wave of a two-layer coupling neuronal network with multi-area channels

College of Mechanics and Optoelectronics Physics, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, P. R. China

Search for more papers by this author

Bing Wang

College of Mechanics and Optoelectronics Physics, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, P. R. China

E-mail Address: hnitwb@126.com

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

Xiaoxiao Zhang

College of Mechanics and Optoelectronics Physics, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, P. R. China

Search for more papers by this author

, and

Hao Chen

College of Mechanics and Optoelectronics Physics, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, P. R. China

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979219503545Cited by:13 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

Using the Hindmarsh–Rose (HR) model, a two-layer neuronal network is constructed to study the spiral wave dynamics. The first layer generates spiral wave induced by random values of boundary under appropriate coupling intensity and external force, and the second layer is in the different states. Coupling channels between the two layers are set in multiple areas and spiral wave of first layer affect second layer via the coupling channels. The spatiotemporal pattern of neuronal network is investigated in the second layer. It is shown that spiral wave can be found under appropriate conditions, multi-area channels are more likely to generate spiral waves and target waves than only one local coupling area. A statistical variable on the second layer is calculated by increasing intensity of channels between layers. The larger the coupling areas between layers, the more obvious the synchronism phenomenon is.

Keywords:

PACS: 05.45.-a, 47.54.-r, 87.19.lq, 87.18.Hf

You currently do not have access to the full text article.
Recommend the journal to your library today!

References

1. A. L. Hodgkin and A. F. Huxley, J. Physiol. 117, 500 (1952). Web of Science, Google Scholar
2. J. L. Hindmarsh and R. M. Rose, Nature 296, 162 (1982). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
3. E. M. Izhikevich, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 14, 1569 (2003). Web of Science, Google Scholar
4. E. M. Izhikevich, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 15, 1063 (2004). Web of Science, Google Scholar
5. G. Gu and B. Pan, Nonlinear Dyn. 81, 2107 (2015). Web of Science, Google Scholar
6. B. Ibarz, J. M. Casado and M. A. F. Sanjuán, Phys. Rep. 501, 1 (2011). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
7. D. S. Lee, Phys. Rev. E 72, 026208 (2005). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
8. M. Perc, Chaos Solitons Fractals 31, 280 (2007). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
9. M. Itoh and L. O. Chua, Int. J. Bifurcat Chaos 18, 3183 (2008). Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. M. Hildebrand, M. Bär and M. Eiswirth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1503 (1995). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
11. D. He et al., Phys. Rev. E 65, 055204 (2002). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
12. P. Biler, Nonlinear Anal. 19, 1121 (1992). Web of Science, Google Scholar
13. J. Ma et al., Physica A 461, 586 (2016). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
14. H. Wang et al., Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 19, 3242 (2014). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
15. H. G. Gu et al., Physica A 392, 1361 (2013). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
16. H. X. Qin et al., Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 57, 1918 (2014). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
17. J. Ma et al., Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 18, 1665 (2013). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
18. X. Xu, W. Jin and J. Ma, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 29, 1550164 (2015). Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
19. H. Qin et al., Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 23, 164 (2015). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
20. Z. Rostami and S. Jafari, Cogn. Neurodynamics 12, 235 (2018). Web of Science, Google Scholar
21. Z. Rostami et al., Appl. Math. Comput. 338, 141 (2018). Web of Science, Google Scholar
22. F. Parastesh et al., Appl. Math. Comput. 354, 377 (2019). Web of Science, Google Scholar
23. M. Wang et al., Physica A 393, 519 (2014). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
24. B. Lindner et al., Phys. Rep. 392, 321 (2004). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
25. X. Zhang et al., Neurocomputing 164, 230 (2015). Web of Science, Google Scholar
26. H. Qin et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 32, 1850298 (2018). Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
27. M. Franović et al., Phys. Rev. E 92, 062911 (2015). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
28. M. Franović et al., Phys. Rev. E 92, 062912 (2015). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
29. D. Guo et al., Europhys. Lett. 124, 50001 (2018). ADS, Google Scholar
30. S. Majhi et al., Phys. Life Rev. 28, 100 (2019). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
31. F. Wu et al., Physica A 493, 54 (2018). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
32. J. Ma, F. Wu and C. Wang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 31, 1650251 (2017). Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
33. H. Qin et al., Physica A 501, 141 (2018). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
34. G. Z. Li, Y. Q. Chen and G. N. Tang, Acta Phys. Sin. 61, 020502 (2012). Web of Science, Google Scholar
35. Y. Yu et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 2585 (2012). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
36. J. Ma et al., Chin. Sci. Bull. 57, 2094 (2012). Web of Science, Google Scholar
37. J. Ma and J. Tang, Sci. China Technol. Sci. 58, 2038 (2015). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
38. Q. Wang et al., Phys. Lett. A 372, 5681 (2008). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
39. Z. Rostami et al., Nonlinear Dyn. 94, 679 (2018). Web of Science, Google Scholar
40. Z. Wang et al., Chaos, Solitons Fractals 128, 229 (2019). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
41. Y. Wu et al., Cogn. Neurodynamics 7, 431 (2013). Web of Science, Google Scholar
42. Y. Yao et al., Sci. Rep. 7, 43151 (2017). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
43. J. Ma et al., Nonlinear Dyn. 84, 497 (2016). Web of Science, Google Scholar
44. J. L. Hindmarsh and R. M. Rose, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 221(1222), 87 (1984). Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar