Research PapersNo Access

A theoretical approach to model variations in ocean color as a function of chlorophyll- $α$ $α$ concentration

Y. N. Aliyeva

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5108-9952

Azerbaijan State Oil and Industry University, 20 Azadlyg Avenue, Baku AZ1010, Azerbaijan

E-mail Address: yeganaaliyev@gmail.com

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

and

K. A. Mammadova

Azerbaijan State Oil and Industry University, 20 Azadlyg Avenue, Baku AZ1010, Azerbaijan

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S021797922150020XCited by:0 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

A method has been proposed to reason the choice among the known optimized models for methods for estimating chlorophyll (Chl) concentration in the seawater according to the information-logarithmic criterion, which provides a comparison of theoretical models by the SeaWiFS data. It has been shown that the most appropriate means is to determine the Chl concentration, since the concentration of Chl in seawater is systematically investigated by marine ships or remote sensing. All optimized models of the optical properties of seawater can be verified by checking the simulated and measured Chl concentration data.

Keywords:

PACS: 42.65.Hw, 42.68.-w, 42.68.Ay

You currently do not have access to the full text article.
Recommend the journal to your library today!

References

1. K. L. Carder et al., Adv. Space Res. 33, 1152 (2004). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
2. H. R. Gordon and A. Morel, Remote Assessment of Ocean Color for Interpretation of Satellite Visible Imagery: A Review (Springer, New York, 1983). Crossref, Google Scholar
3. C. Hu, Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L01603 (2011). ADS, Google Scholar
4. J. E. O’Reilly et al., J. Geophys. Res. 103, 24937 (1998). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
5. N. V. Naghiyeva, SOCAR Proc. 2, 67 (2020). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
6. J. E. O’Reilly et al., Ocean color chlorophyll-a algorithms for SeaWiFS, OC2 and OC4: Version 4, in SeaWiFS Postlaunch Calibration and Validation Analyses, Part 3. NASA Technical Memorandum 206892, Vol. 11., eds. S. B. Hooker and E. R. Firestone (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, 2000), pp. 9–23. Google Scholar
7. M. J. Behrenfeld and P. G. Falkowski, Limnol. Oceanogr. 42, 1 (1997). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
8. S. Sathyendranath et al., Int. J. Remote Sens. 22, 249 (2001). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. T. J. Smyth et al., Int. J. Remote Sens. 23, 2321 (2002). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. M. Kahru and E. G. Mitchell, Int. J. Remote Sens. 20, 3423 (1999). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. Y. I. Aliyev et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 33, 1950271 (2020). Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
12. Y. I. Aliyev et al., Mod. Phys. Lett. B 34, 2050066 (2020). Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
13. C. Hu, Z. Lee and B. Franz, J. Geophys. Res. 117, C01011 (2012). Google Scholar
14. M. Stepane, A. S. David and R. P. Alan, Appl. Opt. 41, 2705 (2002). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
15. S. A. Garver and D. A. Siegel, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 18607 (1997). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
16. L. Ambrosio and N. Dancer, Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations (Springer-Verlag, 2000). Crossref, Google Scholar
17. H. D. Alber, Partial Differential Equations and Calculus of Variations (Springer-Verlag, 1988). Google Scholar
18. Y. I. Aliyev et al., Mod. Phys. Lett. B 33, 1850128 (2020). Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar