Research PaperNo Access

Manipulation of the topology and solid-state spin using a mechanic-based hybrid system

School of Mathematics, Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, Shiyan 442002, P. R. China

Search for more papers by this author

Dong-Yan Lü

School of Mathematics, Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, Shiyan 442002, P. R. China

Search for more papers by this author

Xin-Ke Li

School of Mathematics, Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, Shiyan 442002, P. R. China

Search for more papers by this author

Long Jin

School of Mathematics, Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, Shiyan 442002, P. R. China

Search for more papers by this author

Hong-Tao Ren

School of Materials Science and Engineering, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252000, P. R. China

Search for more papers by this author

, and

Yuan Zhou

School of Mathematics, Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, Shiyan 442002, P. R. China

School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, P. R. China

E-mail Address: zhouyuan@huat.edu.cn

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979222500667Cited by:1 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

In this paper, a three-body hybrid quantum system with the solid-state spin and topological qubit both mediated by a torsional nanomechanical resonator (NMR) is built by taking advantage of two different coupling mechanisms, the so-called strain and the magnetism, respectively. Two basic quantum manipulation (QM) schemes with respect to the quantum interface for arbitrary-state transfer and two-qubit Mølmer–Sørensen (MS) gate are also studied here. Then the efficiency for both QM processes is also systematically estimated, even under the influence of all kinds of adverse factors such as dissipation, decoherence and dephasing. This work may provide an extensible route towards a wider range of applications in quantum manipulation.

Keywords:

PACS: 42.50.−p, 07.10.−h, 74.78.−w

You currently do not have access to the full text article.
Recommend the journal to your library today!

References

1. I. Buluta and F. Nori , Science 326, 108111 (2009). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
2. I. Buluta, S. Ashhab and F. Nori , Rep. Pro. Phys. 74, 104401 (2011). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
3. T. D. Ladd et al., Nature 464, 45 (2010). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
4. I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab and F. Nori , Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 153 (2014). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
5. Z.-L. Xiang et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 623 (2013). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
6. A. Blais, S. M. Girvin and W. D. Oliver , Nat. Phys. 16, 247 (2020). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. A. A. Clerk et al., Nat. Phys. 16, 257 (2020). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
8. I. Carusotto et al., Nat. Phys. 16, 268 (2020). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. S. Haroche, M. Brune and J. M. Raimond , Nat. Phys. 16, 243 (2020). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. C. Song et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 180511 (2017). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
11. E. R. Ortega et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 025005 (2019). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. X. Zhu et al., Nature 478, 221 (2011). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
13. K. Hammerer et al., Phys. Rev. A 70, 044304 (2004). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
14. J. Kasper et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 10411093 (2010). Google Scholar
15. Y. Kubo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 140502 (2010). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
16. Y. Kubo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 220501 (2011). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
17. P. Rabl et al., Phys. Rev. B 79, 041302 (2009). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
18. G.-Q. Zhang et al., PRX Quantum 2, 020307 (2021). Crossref, Google Scholar
19. P.-B. Li et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 015502 (2016). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
20. P.-B. Li and F. Nori , Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 024011 (2018). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
21. P.-B. Li et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 153602 (2020). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
22. X.-L. Dong et al., Unconventional quantum soundmatter interactions in spin-optomechanical-crystal hybrid systems, arXiv 2104, 09101 (2021). Google Scholar
23. J. Cai et al., Nat. Phys. 9, 168 (2013). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
24. X.-Y. Lü et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 093602 (2015). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
25. C. Chamon et al., Phys. Rev. B 81, 224515 (2010). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
26. X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang , Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
27. T. Ozawa et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015006 (2019). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
28. J. Perczel et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 023603 (2017). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
29. W. Nie et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 023603 (2020). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
30. W. Nie and Y. Liu , Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 012076 (2020). Crossref, Google Scholar
31. B. Zeng et al., arXiv:1508.02595 . Google Scholar
32. Y. Wang et al., Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 054007 (2020). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
33. J. Q. You et al., Phys. Rev. B 81, 014505 (2010). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
34. Z. C. Shi et al., Phys. Lett. A 381, 3043 (2017). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
35. L. C. Venuti et al., Phys. Rev. A 96, 053858 (2017). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
36. A. A. Kovalev, A. De and K. Shtengel , Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 106402 (2014). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
37. B. Li et al., Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 044026 (2019). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
38. P. Kotetes, G. Schön and A. Shnirman , J. Korean Phys. Soc. 62, 1558 (2013). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
39. M. C. Dartiailh et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 126803 (2017). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
40. T. L. Schmidt, A. Nunnenkamp and C. Bruder , Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 107006 (2013). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
41. J.-S. Pan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 045303 (2015). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
42. Z.-Y. Xue et al., Phys. Rev. A 79, 040303 (2009). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
43. Y. Zhou et al., Phys. Rev. A 96, 062333 (2017). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
44. Z.-T. Zhang and D. E. Liu , Phys. Rev. B 103, 195401 (2021). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
45. B. Li et al., Phys. Rev. A 96, 032342 (2017). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
46. J. Wang et al., Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 054036 (2018). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
47. A. Sørensen and K. Mølmer , Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1971 (1999). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
48. A. Sørensen and K. Mølmer , Phys. Rev. A 62, 022311 (2000). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
49. Y. Wang et al., Phys. Lett. A 388, 127033 (2021). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
50. P. C. Haljan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 153602 (2005). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
51. A. E. Webb et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 180501 (2018). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
52. Y. Shapira et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 180502 (2018). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
53. Y.-H. Chen et al., Fault-tolerant multi-qubit geometric entangling gates using photonic cat qubits, arXiv:2109.04643 [quant-ph]. Google Scholar
54. J. M. Taylor et al., Nat. Phys. 4, 810 (2008). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
55. M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg and F. Marquardt , Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
56. J. A. Sidles et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 67, 249 (1995). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
57. M. Imboden and P. Mohanty , Phys. Rep. 534, 89 (2014). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
58. M. Li, H. X. Tang and M. L. Roukes , Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 114 (2007). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
59. K. L. Ekinci and M. L. Roukes , Rev. Sci. Instrum. 76, 061101 (2005). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
60. J. Yang, T. Ono and M. Esashi , Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 3860 (2000). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
61. W. A. Brantley , J. Appl. Phys. 44, 534 (1973). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
62. Y. Tao et al., Nat. Commun. 7, 12714 (2016). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
63. Y. Tao et al., Nat. Commun. 5, 3638 (2014). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
64. E. Meyer and S. Rast , Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 267 (2007). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
65. H. J. Mamin et al., Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 301 (2007). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
66. Z. Yin et al., Phys. Rev. A 88, 033614 (2013). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
67. Y. Ma et al., Phys. Rev. A 96, 023827 (2017). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
68. M. J. A. Schuetz et al., Phys. Rev. X 5, 031031 (2015). Web of Science, Google Scholar
69. J. Alicea et al., Nat. Phys. 7, 412 (2011). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
70. S. Datta and B. Das , Applied Physics Letters 56, 665–667 (1990). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
71. J. C. Meyer, M. Paillet and S. Roth , Science 309, 1539 (2005), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1115067. Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
72. J. Teissier et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 020503 (2014). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
73. S. Meesala et al., Phys. Rev. Appl. 5, 034010 (2016). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
74. E. R. MacQuarrie et al., Nat. Commun. 8, 14358 (2017). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
75. J. Cai, F. Jelezko and M. B. Plenio , Nat. Commun. 5, 4065 (2014). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
76. P. Ovartchaiyapong et al., Nat. Commun. 5, 4429 (2014). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
77. P. Rabl et al., Nat. Phys. 6, 602 (2010). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
78. F. Dolde et al., Nat. Phys. 7, 459 (2011). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
79. Y. Zhou et al., Phys. Rev. A 98, 052346 (2018). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
80. D.-Y. Lü et al., Results Phys. 21, 103832 (2021). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
81. Y. Zhou et al., Commun. Theor. Phys. 73, 065101 (2021). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
82. S.-L. Yang et al., Quantum Eng. 3, e65 (2021). Google Scholar
83. X. Li et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 39, 69 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.435409. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
84. S. Bravyi, D. P. DiVincenzo and D. Loss , Ann. Phys. 326, 2793 (2011). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
85. Q. Chen et al., Phys. Rev. A 83, 054305 (2011). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
86. S. Blanes et al., Phys. Rep. 470, 151 (2009). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
87. J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation and F. Nori , Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 1760 (2012). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
88. J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation and F. Nori , Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1234 (2013). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar