Search
This Journal
This Journal
Anywhere
Quick Search in Journals
Enter words / phrases / DOI / ISBN / keywords / authors / etc
Access type:Only show content I have full access toOnly show Open Access
Advanced Search
0 My Cart
Sign in
Institutional Access

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

Research PaperNo Access

Solar system physical treatment using a turbulator and nanomaterial through absorber duct

Mohammed N. Ajour

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4806-230X

Center of Research Excellence in Renewable Energy and Power Systems, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia

E-mail Address: mohnajour1@gmail.com

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

,

Muhyaddin J. H. Rawa

Center of Research Excellence in Renewable Energy and Power Systems, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia

Search for more papers by this author

,

Ahmad H. Milyani

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia

Search for more papers by this author

, and

School of New Energy, New Energy Materials and Devices Center, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, P. R. China

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979224500954Cited by:1 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

A three-part tape-enhanced tube was used in the current hypothetical solar unit to save the most radiation possible. The three parts were joined at different angles ( $β$ $β$ ). The parameters of the carrier base fluid after mixing with CuO nanopowder were calculated using a homogeneous model. By adjusting the range of Y $^{+}$ $^{+}$ , multiple layers were used to precisely depict the behavior of flow close to the wall. The results show the components of irreversibility as bar charts, velocity contours, and exergy drop contours. The tape angle ( $β$ $β$ ) and inlet velocity were thought to be the main driving forces. An evaluation of the accommodation’s validity using numerical data shows that it is sufficient. The wall temperature decreases by about 0.0257% as the nanofluid angle rises and more collisions with the wall take place. Xd falls off roughly 5.19% from 0^∘ to 45^∘ and 5.87% from 0^∘ to 90^∘ as the angle $β$ $β$ rises. As $β$ $β$ rises, the entropy of friction increases by 9.88%. The outer wall cools by about 0.87% and Xd falls by about 92.3% when $β = 4 5^{\circ}$ $β = 4 5^{\circ}$ and Re rises.

Keywords:

PACS: 02.60.Cb, 02.30.Jr

You currently do not have access to the full text article.
Recommend the journal to your library today!

References

1. J. Li, W. H. Alawee, M. J. H. Rawa, H. A. Dhahad, Y.-M. Chu, A. Issakhov, N. H. Abu-Hamdeh , Journal of Molecular Liquids, 326, 115268 (2021). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
2. Z. Khalili and M. Sheikholeslami , Sustainable Cities and Society 93, 104543 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104543. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
3. Y. Qin , Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 127, 105487 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105487 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
4. Y. A. Rothan , Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 102, e202100542 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.202100542 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
5. Z. Said et al., Appl. Therm. Eng. 212, 118633 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.118633 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
6. M. Sheikholeslami and Z. Ebrahimpour , Int. J. Therm. Sci. 176, 107505 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2022.107505 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. T. Wang et al., J. Mol. Liq. 329, 115052 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.115052 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
8. T. Huq et al., Appl. Therm. Eng. 210, 118342 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.118342 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. Z. Said et al., Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 53, 102708 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102708 Google Scholar
10. Y.-M. Chu et al., Fractal Fract. 5, 119 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract5030119 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. X. Zhang et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1502588 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201502588 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. Y.-M. Chu, M. Numan, S. I. Butt, M. K. Siddiqui, R. Ullah, M. Cancan and U. Ali , Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds 42(5), 2591 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/10406638.2020.1852271. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
13. Y.-M. Chu et al., J. Mol. Liq. 320, 114457 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.114457 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
14. M. Wang et al., Nat. Chem. 10, 667 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-018-0045-4 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
15. Y.-M. Chu et al., J. Mol. Liq. 318, 114321 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.114321 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
16. S. Mu et al., Natl. Sci. Rev. 8, nwaa178 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa178 Google Scholar
17. T.-H. Zhao, M. Ijaz Khan and Y.-M. Chu , Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 46, 3012 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.7310 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
18. X. Gong et al., Int. J. Control 20, 1002 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-021-0096-y Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
19. P.-Y. Xiong et al., J. Mol. Liq. 334, 116096 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2021.116096 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
20. S. Lu et al., Front. Neurorobot. 16, 928863 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2022.928863 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
21. Y. A. Rothan , Mod. Phys. Lett. B 36, 2250002 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217984922500026 Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
22. Y.-M. Chu et al., Appl. Math. Comput. 419, 126883 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2021.126883 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
23. Z. Huang et al., Energy 261, 125228 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125228 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
24. H. Ayed et al., J. Energy Storage 55, 105582 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.105582 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. E. Bellos et al., Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 16, 53 (2016). Web of Science, Google Scholar
26. M. Sheikholeslami and M. Jafaryar , Int. J. Therm. Sci. 184, 108015 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2022.108015 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
27. R. K. Ajeel, W. S. I. W. Salim and K. Hasnan , Adv. Powder Technol. 30, 2262 (2019). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
28. M. Kosker and F. Yilmaz , Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensification 154, 108008 (2020). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
29. M. Sheikholeslami, Z. Said and M. Jafaryar , Renew. Energy 188, 922 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.02.086 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
30. T. Bouhal et al., Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 26, 93 (2018). Web of Science, Google Scholar
31. I. Zakaria et al., Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 41, 5096 (2016). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
32. L. S. Sundar et al., Renew. Energy 119, 820 (2018). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
33. M. Sheikholeslami , Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 243, 111786 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2022.111786 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
34. D. G. Subhedar et al., Mater. Today Proc. 26, 1478 (2020). Crossref, Google Scholar
35. E. Bellos, C. Tzivanidis and N. Nikolaou , Energy Convers. Manage. 198, 111831 (2019). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
36. ANSYS $®$ Academic research, release 18.1, ANSYS FLUENT, Theory Guide, ANSYS, Inc. Google Scholar
37. H. K. Versteeg and W. Malalasekera , An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method, 2nd edn. (Pearson/Prentice Hall, Harlow, England, 2007). Google Scholar
38. T. Shih et al., Comput. Fluids 24, 227 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7930(94)00032-T Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
39. A. Shafee et al., J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 144, 1597 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09563-5 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
40. D. Kim et al., Curr. Appl. Phys. 9, 119 (2009). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar

Journal cover image

Vol. 38, No. 07

Metrics

Downloaded 10 times

History

Received 21 November 2022

Revised 8 December 2022

Accepted 11 January 2023

Published: 21 April 2023

Keywords