Research PaperNo Access

Radiation absorption impact on the thermophysical properties of Cu- and TiO₂-water nanofluids: Laplace transform technique

Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Arunachal Pradesh, Jote, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh 791113, India

E-mail Address: ramprakash0808@gmail.com

Search for more papers by this author

S. R. Mishra

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3018-394X

Department of Mathematics, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751030, India

E-mail Address: satyaranjan_mshr@yahoo.co.in

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

, and

G. K. Panda

Department of Basic & Applied Science, National Institute of Technology, Jote, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh 791113, India

E-mail Address: gkpandamathematics@gmail.com

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979224502382Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

An electrically conducting time-dependent flow of water-based nanofluid comprised of Copper and Titanium oxide over a stationary plate embedding with a porous matrix is analyzed in this study. The novelty arises due to the interaction of both the thermal radiation as well as the radiation absorption that affect the heat transport phenomenon. In the single-phase flow, both the variation of particle concentration and the solutal concentration for the inclusion of chemical reaction are taken care of. Also, the influence of the free convection phenomena is explained significantly. The transformed dimensionless system of the governing equations is handled analytically by using the Laplace Transform method. The behavior of the characterizing parameters involved in the governing equations is presented via graphs and the simulation of the numerical results of the rate coefficients like shear rate and rate of heat and solutal transfer is deployed through the table. However, the physical significance of these parameters is deliberated briefly. Finally, the important outcomes are higher heavier species because of lesser solutal diffusivity which attenuates the fluid concentration throughout the domain. Further, radiation absorption causes a significant boost in the nanofluid temperature distribution.

Keywords:

PACS: 44.05.+e, 44.25.+i, 44.40.+a

You currently do not have access to the full text article.
Recommend the journal to your library today!

References

1. S. U. S. Choi and J A. Eastman, Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. United States: N. p., 1995. Web. Google Scholar
2. W. F. Huges and F. J. Yong, The Electro-Magneto-Dynamics of Fluids (John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA, 1966). Google Scholar
3. X. Q. Wang and A. S. Mujumdar, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 46, 1 (2007). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
4. S. Ahmed, A. Batin and A. J. Chamkha, Alex. Eng. J. 54, 45 (2015). Crossref, Google Scholar
5. R. P. Sharma et al., Heat Transf. 50(8), 8506 (2021). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
6. D. Pal and S. Chatterjee, Comput. Appl. Math. 219(14), 7556 (2013). Google Scholar
7. R. Muthucumarswamy and G. S. Kumar, Theor. Appl. Mech. 31(1), 35 (2004). Crossref, Google Scholar
8. M. A. A. Hamad and I. Pop, Heat Mass Transf. 47, 1517 (2011). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
9. G. S. Seth, Md. S. Ansari and R. Nandkeolyar, Heat Mass Transf. 47, 551 (2011). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
10. D. Pal and B. Talukdar, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 15(7), 1813 (2010). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
11. J. Hartmann, Det Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Mathematisk- Fysiske Meddelelser 15(6), 1 (1937). Google Scholar
12. J. Hartmann and F. Lazarus, Det Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Mathematisk- Fysiske Meddelelser 15(7), 1 (1937). Google Scholar
13. N. Liron and H. E. Wilhelm, J. Appl. Math. Mech. 54, 27 (1974). Google Scholar
14. V. J. Rossow, NACA Tech. Rep. 3071, 489 (1957). Google Scholar
15. T. Salah Uddin et al., Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 25, 100895 (2021). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
16. T. Sarpkaya, Flow of Non-Newtonian Fluids in a Magnetic Field (John Wiley & Sons, 1961), pp. 324–328. Google Scholar
17. M. E. Sayed-Ahmed and H. A. Attia, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 27(8), 1177 (2000). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
18. B. J. Gireesha, B. Mahanthesh and M. M. Rashidi, Int. J. Ind. Math. 7(3), 247 (2015). Google Scholar
19. O. D. Makinde and T. Chinyoka, Comput. Math. Appl. 60, 660 (2010). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
20. V. Malapati and P. Polarapu, Procedia Eng. 127, 791 (2015). Crossref, Google Scholar
21. A. G. V. Kumar and S. V. K. Verma, Int. J. Eng. 3, 493 (2011). Google Scholar
22. S. Ahmed, Ain Shams Eng. J. 5, 923 (2014). Crossref, Google Scholar
23. A. A. Mahmoud and A. J. Chamkha, Int. J. Chem. Reactor Eng. 8, 1 (2010). Google Scholar
24. M. A. Hossain and H. S. Takhar, Heat Mass Transf. 31, 243 (1996). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
25. T. Hayat et al., J. Mol. Liq. 225, 482 (2017). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
26. M. Sheikholeslami and D. D. Ganji, Powder Technol. 235, 873 (2013). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
27. M. Sheikholeslami et al., J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 45(3), 795 (2014). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
28. J. Saleh, Fluid Flow Handbook (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2002). Google Scholar
29. B. Mahanthesh, B. J. Gireesha and R. S. R. Gorla, Alex. Eng. J. 55(1), 569 (2016). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
30. S. Das and R. N. Jana, Alex. Eng. J. 54(1), 55 (2015). Crossref, Google Scholar
31. J. Zueco, Commun. Numer. Methods Eng. 24, 1093 (2008). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
32. B. J. Gireesha, P. B. S. Kumar and B. Mahanthesh, Microgravity Sci. Technol. 30(3), 257 (2018). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
33. M. Sheikholeslami, S. Soleimani and D. D. Ganji, J. Mol. Liq. 213, 153 (2016). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
34. M. Sheikholeslami, M. M. Rashidi and D. D. Ganji, J. Mol. Liq. 212, 117 (2015). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
35. R. P. Sharma et al., Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math. 8, 171 (2022). Crossref, Google Scholar
36. A. J. Chamkha, A. M. Rashad and E. Al-Meshaiei, Int. J. Chem. Eng. 9(1), 1 (2001). Google Scholar
37. S. Baag and S. R. Mishra, J. Nanofluids 4(3), 1 (2015). Crossref, Google Scholar
38. B. C. Rout and S. R. Mishra, Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 21(1), 60 (2018). Crossref, Google Scholar
39. M. Shoaib et al., Waves Random Complex Media 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/17455030.2022.2123573 Google Scholar
40. M. Shoaib et al., Waves Random Complex Media 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/17455030.2022.2128228 Google Scholar
41. Y. Dharmendar Reddy et al., Alex. Eng. J. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.08.049 Google Scholar
42. M. Shoaib et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 36, 2250192 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979222501922 Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
43. M. Shoaib et al., Alex. Eng. J. 61, 12211 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.06.014 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
44. P. Mathur and S. R. Mishra, Heat Transf. 51, 753 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/htj.22328 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
45. P. Mathur, S. R. Mishra and P. K. Pattnaik, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. N (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/23977914221093839 Google Scholar
46. P. Mathur et al., J. Heat Transf. 50, 6529 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/htj.22191 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
47. B. K. Sharma et al., Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. E (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089221128768 Google Scholar
48. R. Gandhi, B. K. Sharma and O. D. Makinde, Z. Angew. Math. Mech. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.202100532 Google Scholar
49. B. K. Sharma et al., Sci. Rep. 12, 17688 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22521-5 Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
50. M. Sharma, B. K. Sharma and B. Tripathi, Int. J. Nonlinear Anal. Appl. 13, 2573 (2022). Web of Science, Google Scholar
51. B. K. Sharma et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 36, 2250220 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979222502204 Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
52. C. Kumawat et al., Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 133, 105954 (2022). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
53. T. Tayebi et al., Sustain. Ener. Technol. Assess. 46, 101274 (2021). Google Scholar
54. A. J. Chamkha, A. S. Dogonchi and D. D. Ganji, Appl. Sci. 8 (12). https://doi.org/10.3390/app8122396 Google Scholar
55. S. M. Seyyedi et al., Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow 30(11), 4811 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/HFF-11-2019-0845 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
56. A. S. Dogonchi et al., Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow 30(2), 659 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/HFF-05-2019-0390 Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar