Research PaperNo Access

Unsteady Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) mixed convection flow over a cone with the effect of chemical reaction and viscous dissipation

Zubair Mustafa

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7101-5205

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, International Islamic University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan

E-mail Address: zubairch13@yahoo.com

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

T. Javed

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, International Islamic University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan

E-mail Address: tariq_17pk@yahoo.com

Search for more papers by this author

, and

T. Hayat

Department of Mathematics, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan

E-mail Address: fmgpak@gmail.com

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S021797922450320XCited by:1 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

This paper investigates the Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) convective flow over a cone with the influence of viscous dissipation, variable viscosity, chemical reaction and variable thermal conductivity effects. Related equations are tackled by the Homotopy analysis method (HAM). The impacts of physical variables on concentration, velocity and temperature are presented through numerical tables and graphs. It is noticed that the heat transfer rate (Nusselt number) increases against Prandtl number. Similarly, the mass transfer rate (Sherwood number) increases against Schmidt number. Also, it is seen that skin friction in tangential and azimuthal direction increases against the buoyancy forces ratio parameter. Current results are validated with previous literature work.

Keywords:

PACS: 02.60.Cb

You currently do not have access to the full text article.
Recommend the journal to your library today!

References

1. I. Mustafa, T. Javed and A. Majeed, Can. J. Phys. 93, 1365 (2011). Crossref, ADS, Google Scholar
2. Y. Lin et al., Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 84, 903 (2015). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
3. Y. Zhanga and L. Zheng, Chem. Eng. Sci. 69, 449 (2015). Crossref, Google Scholar
4. M. Kiyasatfar and N. Pourmahmoud, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 99, 26 (2016). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
5. M. K. Nayaka, G. C. Dash and L. P. Singh, Propuls. Power Res. 5, 70 (2016). Crossref, Google Scholar
6. T. Javed and M. A. Siddiqui, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 125, 419 (2018). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. S. R. Hosseini et al., Powder Technol. 34, 914 (2019). Crossref, Google Scholar
8. X. Xiao and C. N. Kim, Fusion Eng. Des. 160, 990111 (2020). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. B. S. Goud, P. P. Kumar and B. S. Malga, Partial Differ. Equ. Appl. Math. 2, 100015 (2020). Crossref, Google Scholar
10. F. Ali et al., Int. J. Non Linear Mech. 47, 521 (2012). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. S. Nadeem and S. Saleem, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 44, 596 (2013). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. T. Hayat et al., Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 185, 105168 (2020). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
13. S. A. Khan et al., Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 45, 14552 (2020). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
14. S. Islam et al., Sci. Rep., doi:10.1038/s41598-020-74393-2. Google Scholar
15. A. Khan, Z. Shah, E. Alzahrani and S. Islam, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2020.104979. Google Scholar
16. A. Khan et al., Phys. Scr., doi:10.1088/1402-4896/abdf83. Google Scholar
17. K. Muhammad, T. Hayat and A. Alsaedi, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 143, 1291 (2021). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
18. K. Muhammad et al., Appl. Nanosci. 11, 9 (2021). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
19. K. Muhammad, T. Hayat and A. Alsaedi, Waves Random Complex Media, doi:10.1080/17455030.2021.1892865. Google Scholar
20. T. Hayat, K. Muhammad and A. Alsaedi, Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow, doi:10.1108/hff-11-2020-0757. Google Scholar
21. D. Anlikumar and S. Roy, Appl. Math. Comput. 155, 545 (2004). Web of Science, Google Scholar
22. G. C. Shit and S. Majee, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 388, 106 (2015). Crossref, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
23. O. D. Makinde, W. A. Khan and J. R. Culham, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 93, 595 (2016). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
24. W. A. Khan, O. D. Makinde and Z. H. Khan, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 96, 525 (2016). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. J. C. Umavathi, M. A. Sheremen and S. Mohiuddin, Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids 58, 98 (2016). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
26. S. Manjunatha and B. J. Gireesha, Ain Shams Eng. J. 7, 505 (2016). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
27. A. Khan et al., Sci. Rep., doi:10.1038/s41598-021-86968-8. Google Scholar
28. A. Khan et al., Case Stud. Therm. Eng., doi:10.1016/j.csite.2021.100989. Google Scholar
29. A. Khan et al., Plos One, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0249264. Google Scholar
30. R. A. Mohamed and S. M. Abo-Dahab, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 48, 1800 (2009). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
31. Y. I. Seini, J. Eng. Manuf. Technol. 1, 24 (2013). Google Scholar
32. M. H. Matin and I. Pop, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 46, 134 (2013). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
33. B. I. Olajuwon, Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. 15, 117 (2013). Google Scholar
34. M. Ramzan and M. Bilal, J. Mol. Liq. 215, 212 (2016). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
35. M. R. Krishnamurthy et al., Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 19, 53 (2016). Crossref, Google Scholar
36. A. J. Chamkha and A. A. Mudhaf, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 44, 276 (2005). Crossref, Google Scholar
37. M. G. Reddy, P. Padma and B. Shankar, Ain Shams Eng. J. 6, 1195 (2015). Crossref, Google Scholar
38. H. Ragueb and K. Mansouri, Energy Convers. Manag. 68, 124 (2013). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
39. A. Pantokratoras, Appl. Math. Model. 29, 553 (2005). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
40. A. Munir, A. Shahzad and M. Khan, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 97, 120 (2015). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
41. R. Dhanai, P. Rana and L. Kumar, Powder Technol. 273, 62 (2015). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar