Research PapersNo Access

Stochastic dynamic analysis of a Kaplan turbine system considering synergistic regulation

State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710048, China

E-mail Address: wpp19850303@163.com

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

and

Shouyi Li

State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710048, China

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217984921502602Cited by:1 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

A stochastic dynamic model of a Kaplan turbine is established in this paper during the transient process. When the Kaplan turbine operates with fluctuating load, the synergistic relationship between the guide vanes and blades experiences random fluctuation resulting from the mechanical, hydraulic and signal factors. To study the effect of stochastic fluctuations of the synergistic relationship, Chebyshev polynomial approximation method is adopted to analyze the stochastic dynamic characteristics of the Kaplan turbine during the transient process. Using Chebyshev polynomial approximation, the stochastic model of the Kaplan turbine is simplified to its equivalent deterministic model, and the stochastic dynamic characteristics of the model are investigated in the transient process. The effects of stochastic intensity on the dynamic behaviors of the Kaplan turbine are analyzed by means of numerical simulation. Moreover, the influences of PID parameters on the stochastic dynamic characteristics of the Kaplan turbine are studied through bifurcation diagrams. Analysis of stochastic characteristics and dynamic behaviors suggests that transient performance improvement can be obtained by controlling the synergistic stochastic intensity and PID parameters.

Keywords:

References

1. E. Quaranta, J. Hydraul. Eng. - ASCE 145(11) (2019) 04019043. Web of Science, Google Scholar
2. D. Liu, X. Wang, Y. S. Peng, H. Zhang, Z. H. Xiao, X. D. Han and O. P. Malik, Renew. Energy 154 (2020) 723. Web of Science, Google Scholar
3. Y. N. Zhang, K. H. Liu, H. Z. Xian and X. Z. Du, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 81 (2018) 1269. Web of Science, Google Scholar
4. N. Sotoudeh, R. Maddahian and M. J. Cervantes, Renew. Energy 151 (2020) 238. Web of Science, Google Scholar
5. J. J. Martinez, Z. D. Deng, P. S. Titzler, J. P. Duncan, J. Lu, R. P. Mueller, C. Tian, B. A. Trumbo, M. L. Ahmann and J. F. Renholds, Renew. Energy 131 (2020) 240. Web of Science, Google Scholar
6. A. S. Dehkharqani, M. J. Cervantes and J.-O. Aidanpää, Adv. Mech. Eng. 9(9) (2017) 1. Google Scholar
7. I. Bozic and M. Benisek, Renew. Energy 94 (2016) 537. Web of Science, Google Scholar
8. B. B. Xu, D. Y. Chen, X. Gao, C. Tomas and E. Patelli, Nonlinear Dyn. 92(4) (2018) 1801. Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. H. Zhang, P. C. Guo and L. G. Sun, Renew. Energy 152 (2020) 34. Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. Q. Q. Wu, L. K. Zhang and Z. Y. Ma, Nonlinear Dyn. 87(1) (2017) 459. Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. H. H. Kim, M. Rakibuzzaman, M. Kim and S. H. Suh, Energies 12(2) (2019) 264. Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. H. A. Menarin, H. A. Costa, G. L. M. Fredo, R. P. Gosmann, E. C. Finardi and L. A. Weiss, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 34 (2019) 3026. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
13. Q. Q. Li, Z. L. Xu, M. C. Cheng, Y. F. Ma, X. W. Zhang and G. J. Li, Mod. Phys. Lett. B 34 (2020) 2050158. Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
14. J. Schiffer, H. Benigni and H. Jaberg, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C, J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 232 (2018) 1937. Web of Science, Google Scholar
15. W. Han, Y. Liu, C. Y. Gong, Y. L. Su, P. Y. Guo, M. Su, F. X. Shi and Z. Z. Wei, Mod. Phys. Lett. B 34 (2020) 2050094. Link, Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
16. M. Shinozuka, J. Eng. Mech. - ASCE 114 (1988) 1335. Web of Science, Google Scholar
17. W. K. Liu, G. H. Besterfied and P. Belytschko, J. Eng. Mech. - ASCE 114 (1988) 2115. Web of Science, Google Scholar
18. P. D. Spanos and R. G. Ghanem, J. Eng. Mech. - ASCE 115 (1989) 1035. Web of Science, Google Scholar
19. H. Jensen and W. D. Iwan, J. Eng. Mech. - ASCE 118 (1992) 1012. Web of Science, Google Scholar
20. T. Fang, X. L. Leng and C. Q. Song, J. Sound Vib. 226 (2003) 198. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
21. F. Thiery, R. Gustavsson and J. O. Aidanpaa, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 99 (2015) 251. Web of Science, Google Scholar
22. W. C. Guo, J. D. Yang, J. P. Chen and M. J. Wang, Nonlinear Dyn. 84 (2016) 1383. Web of Science, Google Scholar
23. H. X. Chen, D. Q. Zhou, Y. Zheng, S. W. Jiang, A. Yu and Y. Guo, Energies 11 (2018) 3354. Web of Science, Google Scholar
24. S. Li, X. C. Li and D. Y. Chen, IEEJ Trans. Electr. Electron. Eng. 14(3) (2019) 366. Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. B. Q. Guo, B. B. Xu, D. Y. Chen, W. Ye and H. H. Li, J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 14 (2019) 071006. Web of Science, Google Scholar
26. H. Zhang, D. Y. Chen, C. Z. Wu, X. Y. Wang, J. M. Lee and K. H. Jung, Energy Convers. Manage. 138 (2017) 375. Web of Science, Google Scholar
27. H. Zhang, D. Y. Chen, P. C. Guo, X. Q. Luo and A. George, Energy Convers. Manage. 165 (2018) 861. Web of Science, Google Scholar
28. W. J. Yang, P. Norrlund, L. Saarinen, A. Witt, B. Smith, J. D. Yang and U. Lundin, Nat. Commun. 9 (2018) 2633. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
29. D. Y. Li, H. J. Wang, Y. L. Qin, Z. G. Li, X. Z. Wei and D. Q. Qin, Renew. Energy 126 (2018) 668. Web of Science, Google Scholar
30. L. P. Wang, Y. M. Chen, D. Y. Liu and D. Boutat, Int. J. Comput. Math. 96(11) (2019) 2487. Web of Science, Google Scholar