World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

Analyzing the effects of variable fluid properties on radiative dissipative hybrid nanofluid over moving wedge with MHD and Joule heating

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217984925500551Cited by:3 (Source: Crossref)

    Understanding and optimizing heat transfer processes in complex fluid systems is the driving force behind studying the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flow of Al2O3CuH2O nanofluid across a radiative moving wedge, taking into account the impacts of viscous dissipation and Joule heating. Nanofluids, such as Al2O3CuH2O, increase heat transmission and thermal efficiency. However, the complicated challenges caused by fluid characteristics and radiative heating need a thorough investigation. This study examines MHD hybrid nanofluid heat transfer via a permeable wedge using joule heating, mass suction, viscous dissipation, variable viscosity, thermal radiation, variable thermal conductivity, and variable Prandtl number. We use similarity transformation to solve the ordinary differential equations that follow from the governing partial differential equations. We then check the results for correctness and dependability. To ensure the reliability and validity of the outcomes, source parameters are crucial to the validation process. The consequence of changing these parameters on the heat transmission properties of the MHD hybrid nanofluid is studied for both the scenario without and with thermal radiation by methodically analyzing the percentage increase or reduction. The validation process also includes a comparison of the computed values, such as the heat transfer rate and skin friction factor, with established theoretical predictions. This examination guarantees that the numerical solution, executed using the bvp4c technique in MATLAB, corresponds to the anticipated physical behavior of the system being studied. In addition, the findings exist using both graphical and tabular forms, which allows for a clear and succinct illustration of how different physical limitations affect flow characteristics.

    PACS: 89.75.Hc, 89.40.a, 44.25.+f, 44.40.+a, 47.11.+j, 47.15.Cb, 47.55.P–