Processing math: 100%
World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

Head Pose Estimation Based on Multi-Level Feature Fusion

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218001424560020Cited by:3 (Source: Crossref)

    Head Pose Estimation (HPE) has a wide range of applications in computer vision, but still faces challenges: (1) Existing studies commonly use Euler angles or quaternions as pose labels, which may lead to discontinuity problems. (2) HPE does not effectively address regression via rotated matrices. (3) There is a low recognition rate in complex scenes, high computational requirements, etc. This paper presents an improved unconstrained HPE model to address these challenges. First, a rotation matrix form is introduced to solve the problem of unclear rotation labels. Second, a continuous 6D rotation matrix representation is used for efficient and robust direct regression. The RepVGG-A2 lightweight framework is used for feature extraction, and by adding a multi-level feature fusion module and a coordinate attention mechanism with residual connection, to improve the network’s ability to perceive contextual information and pay attention to features. The model’s accuracy was further improved by replacing the network activation function and improving the loss function. Experiments on the BIWI dataset 7:3 dividing the training and test sets show that the average absolute error of HPE for the proposed network model is 2.41. Trained on the dataset 300W_LP and tested on the AFLW2000 and BIWI datasets, the average absolute errors of HPE of the proposed network model are 4.34 and 3.93. The experimental results demonstrate that the improved network has better HPE performance.