No Access

ELECTRONICALLY-CONTROLLABLE FLOATING INDUCTOR USING OPERATIONAL MIRRORED AMPLIFIER

Electronics and Communication Engineering Department, Ambedkar Institute of Technology, Shakarpur, Delhi, 110 092, India

Search for more papers by this author

R. SENANI

Division of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Netaji Subhas Institute of Technology, Azad Hind Fauj Marg, Sector-3, Dwarka, New Delhi, 110 075, India

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

D. R. BHASKAR

Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, 110 025, India

Search for more papers by this author

A. K. SINGH

Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Inderprastha Engineering College, Sahibabad Ghaziabad, UP, 201 010, India

Search for more papers by this author

, and

S. S. GUPTA

Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India, Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi 110 011, India

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218126609004922Cited by:2 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

The operational mirrored amplifiers (OMA) were introduced as useful building blocks for facilitating an easy realization of floating impedances (in conjunction with RC elements) as compared to other approaches of floating impedance simulation. In this paper, we present a new formulation, for realizing a floating inductance (FI) using an OMA which takes into account the dominant pole of the op-amp employed in the OMA and hence, does not require any external capacitor. Moreover, when the only external resistor employed is replaced by an electronically-controlled resistance, the resulting circuit permits an electronically controllable floating inductance. The workability of the proposed FI has been demonstrated by PSPICE simulations.

Keywords:

References

G. Normand, Electron. Lett. 22, 521 (1986), DOI: 10.1049/el:19860355. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
C. Toumazou and F. J. Lidgey , Analog IC Design: The Current Mode Approach ( Peter Peregrinus Lt. , 1990 ) . Google Scholar
J. Malhotra and R. Senani, Electron. Lett. 30, 3 (1994), DOI: 10.1049/el:19940067. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
J. Malhotra and R. Senani, Electron. Lett. 30, 1113 (1994), DOI: 10.1049/el:19940067. Web of Science, Google Scholar
S. Ozoguz and C. Acar, Electron. Lett. 34, 605 (1998), DOI: 10.1049/el:19980506. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
R. Senani, Electron. Lett. 31, 423 (1995), DOI: 10.1049/el:19950287. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
G. Wilson and P. K. Chan, Electron. Lett. 25, 1725 (1989), DOI: 10.1049/el:19891154. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
S. Minaeiet al., Int. J. Electron. 89, 905 (2002), DOI: 10.1080/0020721031000120470. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
P. E. Allen and D. R. Holberg , CMOS Analog Circuit Design ( Holt Rinehart and Winston Inc. , 1987 ) . Google Scholar
O. Saaid and A. Fabre, Electron. Lett. 32, 4 (1996), DOI: 10.1049/el:19960023. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
M. T. Abuelmaatti, Frequenz 57, 8 (2003). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar