PapersNo Access

FRACTAL SPECTROSCOPY BY NOISE-FREE STOCHASTIC MULTIRESONANCE AT HIGHER HARMONICS

A. KRAWIECKI

Faculty of Physics, Warsaw University of Technology, Koszykowa 75, PL-00-662 Warsaw, Poland

Search for more papers by this author

S. MATYJAŚKIEWICZ

Faculty of Physics, Warsaw University of Technology, Koszykowa 75, PL-00-662 Warsaw, Poland

Institute of Physics, Humboldt University at Berlin, Invalidenstraße 110, D-10115 Berlin, Germany

Search for more papers by this author

J. A. HOŁYST

Faculty of Physics, Warsaw University of Technology, Koszykowa 75, PL-00-662 Warsaw, Poland

Search for more papers by this author

, and

K. KACPERSKI

Department of Physics, Queen Mary College, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127404009235Cited by:2 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

Noise-free stochastic resonance is investigated in two chaotic maps with periodically modulated control parameter close to a boundary crisis: the Hénon map and the kicked spin model. Response of the maps to the periodic signal at the fundamental frequency and its higher harmonics is examined. The systems show noise-free stochastic multiresonance, i.e. multiple maxima of the signal-to-noise ratio at the fundamental frequency as a function of the control parameter. The maxima are directly related to the fractal structure of the attractors and basins of attraction colliding at the crisis point. The signal-to-noise ratios at higher harmonics show more maxima, as well as dips where the signal-to-noise ratio is zero. This opens a way to use noise-free stochastic resonance to probe the fractal structure of colliding sets by a method which can be called "fractal spectroscopy". Using stochastic resonance at higher harmonics can reveal smaller details of the fractal structures, but the interpretation of results becomes more difficult. Quantitative theory based on a model of a colliding fractal attractor and a fractal basin of attraction is derived which agrees with numerical results for the signal-to-noise ratio at the fundamental frequency and at the first two harmonics, quantitatively for the Hénon map, and qualitatively for the kicked spin model. It is also argued that the maps under study belong to a more general class of threshold-crossing stochastic resonators with a modulated control parameter, and qualitative discussion of conditions under which stochastic multiresonance appears in such systems is given.

Keywords:

References

V. S. Anishchenko, A. B. Neiman and M. A. Safanova, J. Stat. Phys. 70, 183 (1993). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
V. S. Anishchenko, M. A. Safonova and L. O. Chua, Int. J. Bifurcation and Chaos 4, 441 (1994). Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Anishchenko, V. S., Neiman, A. B., Moss, F. & Schimansky-Geier, L. [1999] "Stochastic resonance: Noise-enhanced order," Physics — Uspekhi 42, 7–36; Usp. Fiz. Nauk 169, 7–38 . Google Scholar
K. Arai, K. Yoshimura and S. Mizutani, Phys. Rev. E65, 015202 1 (2002). Google Scholar
R. Bartussek, P. Hänggi and P. Jung, Phys. Rev. E49, 3930 (1994). Google Scholar
R. Bartussek, P. Jung and P. Hänggi, Chaos Solit. Fract. 5, 1775 (1995). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
R. Benzi, A. Sutera and A. Vulpiani, J. Phys. A14, L453 (1981). Google Scholar
A. R. Bulsara, M. E. Inchiosa and L. Gammaitoni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2162 (1996). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
T. L. Carroll and L. M. Peccora, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 576 (1993). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
F. Chapeau-Blondeau, Phys. Rev. E53, 5469 (1995). Google Scholar
F. Chapeau-Blondeau and X. Godivier, Phys. Rev. E55, 1478 (1997). Google Scholar
V. N. Chizhevsky, R. Vilaseca and R. Corbalán, Phys. Rev. E61, 6500 (2000). Google Scholar
A. Crisantiet al., J. Phys. A27, L597 (1994). Google Scholar
L. Gammaitoniet al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 223 (1998). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Z. Gingl, L. B. Kiss and F. Moss, Europhys. Lett. 29, 191 (1995). Crossref, Google Scholar
S. L. Ginzburg and M. A. Pustovoit, Europhys. Lett. 45, 540 (1999). Crossref, Google Scholar
C. Grebogi, E. Ott and J. A. Yorke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1284 (1986). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
C. Grebogiet al., Phys. Rev. A36, 5365 (1987). Google Scholar
M. Grifoni and P. Hänggi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1611 (1996). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
A. N. Grigorenko, S. I. Nikitin and G. V. Roschepkin, Phys. Rev. E56, R4907 (1997). Google Scholar
J. A. Hołyst and A. Sukiennicki, Acta Phys. Polonica A81, 353 (1992). Google Scholar
J. A. Hołyst and A. Sukiennicki, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 104–107, 2111 (1992). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
T. Horita, T. Kanamaru and T. Akishita, Prog. Theor. Phys. 102, 1057 (1999). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Z. Hou, L. Yang and H. Xin, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 1592 (1999). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
P. Jung, Phys. Rep. 234, 175 (1993). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
P. Jung and P. Hänggi, Phys. Rev. A44, 8032 (1991). Google Scholar
P. Jung and P. Talkner, Phys. Rev. E51, 2640 (1995). Google Scholar
K. Kacperski and J. A. Hołyst, Phys. Rev. E55, 5044 (1997). Google Scholar
K. Kacperski and J. A. Hołyst, Phys. Lett. A254, 53 (1999). Google Scholar
K. Kacperski and J. A. Hołyst, Phys. Rev. E60, 403 (1999). Google Scholar
Kovaleva, A. & Simiu, E. [2000] "Chaotic resonance: Hopping rates, spectra and signal-to-noise ratios," AIP. Conf. Proc., Vol. 502, pp. 428–433 . Google Scholar
A. Krawiecki, Acta Phys. Polonica A92, 1101 (1997). Google Scholar
A. Krawieckiet al., Phys. Rev. E64, 041104 1 (2001). Google Scholar
B. Lindner and L. Schimansky-Geier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2934 (2001). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
K. Loerinczet al., Phys. Lett. A254, 154 (1999). Google Scholar
S. Matyjaśkiewiczet al., Phys. Rev. E63, 026215 1 (2001). Google Scholar
B. McNamara and K. Wiesenfeld, Phys. Rev. A39, 4854 (1989). Google Scholar
F. Moss, Contemporary Problems in Statistical Physics, ed. G. H. Weiss (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1994) pp. 205–253. Crossref, Google Scholar
F. Moss, D. Pierson and D. O'Gorman, Int. J. Bifurcation and Chaos 6, 1383 (1994). Web of Science, Google Scholar
F. Moss, Self-Organized Biological Dynamics & Nonlinear Control, ed. J. Walleczek (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000) pp. 236–256. Crossref, Google Scholar
G. Nicolis, C. Nicolis and D. McKernan, J. Stat. Phys. 70, 125 (1993). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
H. Nishimura, N. Katada and K. Aihara, Neural Proc. Lett. 12, 49 (2000). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
A. N. Pisarchik and R. Corbalán, Phys. Rev. E58, R2697 (1998). Google Scholar
E. Reiboldet al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3101 (1997). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Y.-H. Shiau and Z. Néda, Japanese J. Appl. Phys. 40, 6675 (2001). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
V. A. Shneidman, P. Jung and P. Hänggi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2682 (1994). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
S. Sinha, Physica A270, 204 (1999). Google Scholar
S. Sinha and B. K. Chakrabarti, Phys. Rev. E58, 8009 (1998). Google Scholar
J. C. Sommerer and C. Grebogi, Int. J. Bifurcation and Chaos 2, 383 (1992). Link, Google Scholar
M. I. Tsindlekhtet al., Phys. Rev. B62, 4073 (2000). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
J. M. G. Vilar and J. M. Rubí, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2882 (1997). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
J. M. G. Vilar and J. M. Rubí, Physica A264, 1 (1999). Google Scholar
W. Wang and Z. D. Wang, Phys. Rev. E55, 7379 (1997). Google Scholar
K. Wiesenfeldet al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2125 (1994). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
K. Wiesenfeld and F. Moss, Nature 373, 33 (1995). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
W. Yuqing, Z. D. Wang and W. Wang, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 69, 276 (2000). Crossref, Google Scholar
J.-Q. Zhang and H.-W. Xin, Chinese Phys. Lett. 18, 870 (2001). Web of Science, Google Scholar
Ch. Zhou and C.-H. Lai, Phys. Rev. E60, 3928 (1999). Google Scholar
Ch. Zhou and C.-H. Lai, Phys. Rev. E59, R6243 (1999). Google Scholar