Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/CommonHTML/jax.js
World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

Intrinsic linking and knotting in tournaments

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218216519500767Cited by:1 (Source: Crossref)

    A directed graph G is intrinsically linked if every embedding of that graph contains a nonsplit link L, where each component of L is a consistently oriented cycle in G. A tournament is a directed graph where each pair of vertices is connected by exactly one directed edge.

    We consider intrinsic linking and knotting in tournaments, and study the minimum number of vertices required for a tournament to have various intrinsic linking or knotting properties. We produce the following bounds: intrinsically linked (n=8), intrinsically knotted (9n12), intrinsically 3-linked (10n23), intrinsically 4-linked (12n66), intrinsically 5-linked (15n154), intrinsically m-linked (3mn8(2m3)2), intrinsically linked with knotted components (9n107), and the disjoint linking property (12n14).

    We also introduce the consistency gap, which measures the difference in the order of a graph required for intrinsic n-linking in tournaments versus undirected graphs. We conjecture the consistency gap to be nondecreasing in n, and provide an upper bound at each n.

    AMSC: 57M15, 57M25, 05C10, 05C20