World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

Why scalar–tensor equivalent theories are not physically equivalent?

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271817501620Cited by:15 (Source: Crossref)

    Whether Jordan’s and Einstein’s frame descriptions of F(R) theory of gravity are physically equivalent, is a long standing debate. However, practically none questioned on true mathematical equivalence, since classical field equations may be translated from one frame to the other following a transformation relation. Here, we show that, neither Noether symmetries, Noether equations, nor may quantum equations be translated from one to the other. The reason being, — conformal transformation results in a completely different system, with a different Lagrangian. Field equations match only due to the presence of diffeomorphic invariance. Unless a symmetry generator is found which involves Hamiltonian constraint equation, mathematical equivalence between the two frames appears to be vulnerable. In any case, in quantum domain, mathematical and therefore physical equivalence cannot be established.

    PACS: 98.80.Jk
    You currently do not have access to the full text article.

    Recommend the journal to your library today!