ArticleNo Access

SELF-SIMILAR TOUCHING NETWORKS — PART II

Department of Mathematics, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, P. R. China

E-mail Address: 1911071003@nbu.edu.cn

Department of Mathematics, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, P. R. China

Key Laboratory of Computing and Stochastic Mathematics (Ministry of Education), School of Mathematics and Statistics, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan 410081, P. R. China

E-mail Address: xilifeng@nbu.edu.cn

E-mail Address: xilifengningbo@yahoo.com

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

, and

BING ZHAO

Department of Mathematics, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, P. R. China

E-mail Address: zhaobing@nbu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X21501735Cited by:11 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

In this paper, we establish the theory of finite geodesic patterns on limit space to calculate the average distances of touching networks.

Keywords:

References

1. D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz , Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks, Nature 393 (1998) 440–442. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
2. A. L. Barabási and R. Albert , Emergence of scaling in random networks, Science 286 (1999) 509–512. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
3. C. Song, S. Havlin and H. A. Makse , Self-similarity of complex networks, Nature 433 (2005) 392–395. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
4. T. Vicsek , Fractal models for diffusion controlled aggregation, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 16(17) (1983) 647–652. Crossref, Google Scholar
5. Z. Zhang, S. Zhou, L. Fang, J. Guan and Y. Zhang , Maximal planar scale-free Sierpinski networks with small-world effect and power law strength-degree correlation, Europhys. Lett. 79 (2007) 38007. Crossref, Google Scholar
6. Z. Zhang, S. Zhou, Z. Su, T. Zou and J. Guan , Random Sierpinski network with scale-free small-world and modular structure, Eur. Phys. J. B 65 (2008) 141–147. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. M. Dai, Q. Xie and L. Xi , Trapping on weighted tetrahedron Koch networks with small-world property, Fractals 22(1–2) (2014) 1450006. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
8. M. Dai, D. Ye, J. Hou and X. Li , Scaling of average weighted receiving time on double-weighted Koch networks, Fractals 23(2) (2015) 1550011. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. Z. Zhang, S. Zhou, L. Chen, M. Yin and J. Guan , The exact solution of the mean geodesic distance for Vicsek fractals, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 (2008) 485102. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. D. Huang, Z. Yu and V. Anh , Multifractal analysis and topological properties of a new family of weighted Koch networks, Physica A 469 (2017) 695–705. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. J. Liu, J. Wang, Z. Yu and X. Xie , Fractal and multifractal analyses of bipartite networks, Sci. Rep. 7 (2017) 45588. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. B. Hua and Y. Lin , Stochastic completeness for graphs with curvature dimension conditions, Adv. Math. 306 (2017) 279–302. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
13. S. Wang, L. Xi, H. Xu and L. Wang , Scale-free and small-world properties of Sierpinski networks, Physica A 465 (2017) 690–700. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
14. M. Dai, X. Wang, Y. Zong, J. Zou, Y. Chen and W. Su , First-order network coherence and eigentime identity on the weighted Cayley networks, Fractals 25 (2017) 1750049. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
15. Z. Li, Z. Yu and L. Xi , Scale-free effect of substitution networks, Physica A 492 (2018) 1449–1455. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
16. M. F. Dai, J. Y. Liu, J. W. Chang, D. L. Tang, T. T. Ju, Y. Sun and W. Y. Su , Eigentime identity of the weighted scale-free triangulation networks for weight-dependent walk, Physica A 513 (2019) 202–209. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
17. J. Deng and Q. Wang , Asymptotic formula of average distances on fractal networks modeled by Sierpinski tetrahedron, Fractals 27(7) (2019) 1950120. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
18. Q. Wang, Y. Zhu, Q. Pei and L. Xi , Geodesic distance on Lalley–Gatzouras carpets, Fractals 27(7) (2019) 1950123. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
19. L. Xi, B. Sun and J. Yao , Fractality of substitution networks, Fractals 27(3) (2019) 1950034. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
20. Q. Ye and L. Xi , Average distance of substitution networks, Fractals 27(6) (2019) 1950097. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
21. F. Ma, P. Wang and X. Luo , A method for geodesic distance on subdivision of trees with arbitrary orders and their applications, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. (2020), https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2020.3014191. Web of Science, Google Scholar
22. F. Ma and P. Wang , Random walks on a tree with applications, Phys. Rev. E 102(2) (2020) 022305. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
23. F. Ma and P. Wang , Power-law graphs with small diameter: Framework, structural properties, and average trapping time, Phys. Rev. E 103(2) (2021) 022318. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
24. H. Bao, L. Xi and B. Zhao , Self-similar touching networks–part I, Fractals 29(6) (2021) 2150172. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. S. Wang, Z. Yu and L. Xi , Average geodesic distance of Sierpinski gasket and Sierpinski networks, Fractals 25(5) (2017) 1750044. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
26. J. Yang, S. Wang, L. Xi and Y. Ye , Average geodesic distance of skeleton networks of Sierpinski tetrahedron, Physica A 495 (2018) 269–277. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
27. J. Zhu, L. Tian and Q. Wang , Average geodesic distance on Sierpinski hexagon and Sierpinski hexagon networks, Fractals 27(5) (2019) 1950077. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
28. B. Zhao, J. Fan and L. Xi , Average distances of Lindström Snowflake networks, Fractals 29(3) (2021) 2150067. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
29. J. E. Hutchinson , Fractals and self-similarity, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 30(5) (1981) 713–747. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar