Open Access

A QUANTUM FRACTALS THEORY OF THE PIONS CHAOS AND THEIR FUTURISTIC APPLICATIONS WITH GRANULAR SOURCES

GHULAM BARY

Faculty of Science, Yibin University, Yibin 644000, Sichuan, P. R. China

E-mail Address: ghulambary@gmail.com

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

WAQAR AHMED

Department of Bionanotechnology, Hanyang University, Ansan 155-88, South Korea

Search for more papers by this author

RIAZ AHMAD

Faculty of Science, Yibin University, Yibin 644000, Sichuan, P. R. China

Search for more papers by this author

NAWA ALSHAMMARI

Department of Basic Sciences, College of Science and Theoretical Studies, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 11673, Saudi Arabia

Search for more papers by this author

NAWAF N. HAMADNEH

Department of Basic Sciences, College of Science and Theoretical Studies, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 11673, Saudi Arabia

Search for more papers by this author

, and

ILYAS KHAN

Department of Mathematics, College of Science Al-Zulfi, Majmaah University, Al Majmaah 11952, Saudi Arabia

E-mail Address: i.said@mu.edu.sa

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X22401259Cited by:4 (Source: Crossref)

This article is part of the issue:

Special Issue on Fractal AI-Based Analyses and Applications to Complex Systems: Part III
Lead Guest Editors: Yeliz Karaca & Dumitru Baleanu
Guest Editors: Majaz Moonis, Yu-Dong Zhang & Osvaldo Gervasi

Abstract

Higher-order correlations measured in lead collisions examined the geometrical strength as well as the coherence–chaotic characteristics of the particles creation region. The three- and four-particle quantum correlations can delineate the system of pions at small relative momentum region and observe a significant innovative penchant about the granular sources with various parameters. Such conglomerate of correlation functions and their corresponding genuine correlations are rarely analyzed at higher-order quantum computation via invariant momenta to search the granular structure of pion emanation sources. We evince and examine the pions excretion from a dispersed collection of fluid droplets with coherence snippets that produce quantum interferences to explore the nature of the fluid and the characteristics of the chaos fraction in collisions of heavy nuclei. The cumulant correlations and the normalized correlators with their intercepts contained the existence of amalgamation facet of hadronic particles, and the partons plasma. Specifically, we analyze such hybrid fluid with various correlations functions via droplet numbers to probe the trifle of chaos–coherence fraction of pions condensate by using the source with spherical structure droplets.

Keywords:

References

1. J. P. Blaizot, F. Gelis and J. F. Liao, Bose–Einstein condensation and thermalization of the quark gluon plasma, Nuclear Phys. A 873 (2012) 68. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
2. M. Gyulassy, S. K. Kauffmann and L. W. Wilson, Pion interferometry of nuclear collisions. 1. Theory, Phys. Rev. C 20 (1979) 2267. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
3. U. A. Wiedemann and U. W. Heinz, Particle interferometry for relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rep. 319 (1999) 145. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
4. M. M. Aggarwal et al., One-, two- and three-particle distributions from 158AGeV/c central Pb+Pb collisions, Phys. Rev. C 67 (2003) 014906. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
5. D. Gangadharan, Techniques for multiboson interferometry, Phys. Rev. C 92 (2015) 014902. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
6. G. Goldhaber, S. Goldhaber, W. Y. Lee and A. Pais, Influence of Bose–Einstein statistics on the anti-proton proton annihilation process, Phys. Rev. 120 (1960) 300. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. I. V. Andreev, M. Plumer and R. M. Weiner, Quantum statistical approach to Bose–Einstein correlations and its experimental implications, Internat. J. Modern Phys. A 8 (1993) 4577–4626. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
8. H. Boggild et al., Three pion correlations in sulphur lead collisions at the CERN SPS, Phys. Lett. B 455 (1999) 77. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. J. Adams et al., Three pion Hanbury Brown–Twiss correlations in relativistic heavy ion collisions from the STAR experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 262301. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. R. Willson, Measurement of source chaoticity for particle emission in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}} =$ 130-GeV using three particle HBT correlations, Nuclear Phys. A 715 (2003) 619. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. B. B. Abelev et al., Two- and three-pion quantum statistics correlations in Pb–Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{N N}} =$ 2.76TeV at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C 89 (2014) 024911. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. U. W. Heinz and Q. H. Zhang, What can we learn from three pion interferometry? Phys. Rev. C 56 (1997) 426. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
13. U. Ornik, M. Plumer and D. Strottmann, Bose condensation through resonance decay, Phys. Lett. B 314 (1993) 401–407. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
14. J. P. Blaizot et al., Thermalization and Bose–Einstein condensation in overpopulated glasma, Nuclear Phys. A 904–905 (2013) 829c–832c. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
15. E. Ikonen, Chaoticity parameter $λ$ and multiple coherent components in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 78 (2008) 051901. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
16. P. Ru, G. Bary and W. N. Zhang, Pion transverse-momentum spectrum and elliptic anisotropy of partially coherent source, Phys. Lett. B 777 (2018) 79–85. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
17. T. Csorgo, Particle interferometry from 40MeV to 40TeV, Acta Phys. Hungar. A 15 (2002) 203–257. Google Scholar
18. B. L. Friman, K. Kajantie and P. V. Ruuskanen, Converting mixed phase into hadrons, Nuclear Phys. B 266 (1986) 468–486. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
19. M. Gyulassy, K. Kajantie and H. Kurki-Suonio, Deflagrations and detonations as a mechanism of hadron bubble growth in supercooled quark–gluon plasma, Nuclear Phys. B 237 (1984) 477–501. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
20. D. Seibert, Analysis of scaled factorial moment data, Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 3381. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
21. S. Pratt, P. J. Siemens and A. P. Vischer, Kaon pictures of QCD plasma droplets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 (1992) 1109. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
22. W. N. Zhang et al., Detection of source granularity through multiparticle Bose correlations, Phys. Rev. C 51 (1995) 922. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
23. W. N. Zhang, Y. Y. Ren and C. Y. Wong, Analysis of pion elliptic flows and HBT interferometry in a granular quark–gluon plasma droplet model, Phys. Rev. C 74 (2006) 1832–1838. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
24. W. N. Zhang, M. J. Efaaf and C. Y. Wong, Pion interferometry for a granular source of quark–gluon plasma droplets, Phys. Rev. C 70 (2004) 024903. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. W. N. Zhang et al., Characteristic quantities of pion-emitting sources extracted by model-independent analysis in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 80 (2009) 044908. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
26. J. Adam et al., Multipion Bose–Einstein correlations in $p p, p$ -Pb, and Pb–Pb collisions at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. C 93 (2016) 054908. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
27. G. Bary, P. Ru and W. N. Zhang, Analyses of multi-pion Hanbury Brown–Twiss correlations for the pion-emitting sources with Bose–Einstein condensation, J. Phys. G 45 (2018) 065102. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
28. G. Bary, P. Ru and W. N. Zhang, Normalized multi-pion Hanbury–Brown–Twiss correlation functions of pion-emitting sources with Bose–Einstein condensation, J. Phys. G 46 (2019) 115107. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
29. G. Bary, W.-N. Zhang, P. Ru and J. Yang, Analyses of multi-pion Bose–Einstein correlations for granular sources with coherent pion-emission droplet, Chin. Phys. C 45 (2021) 024106. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
30. G. Bary, W. Ahmed and M. Sajid, An efficient mathematical approach for the fraction order differentiation based on future applications of chaotic parameter, Math. Probl. Eng. 2021 (2021) 11. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
31. G. Bary et al., Regio- and stereoselective functionalization of alkenes with emphasis on mechanistic insight and sustainability concerns, J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 25 (2021) 101260. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
32. Y. Karaca, Y. D. Zhang and M. Khan, Characterizing complexity and self-similarity based on fractal and entropy analyses for stock market forecast modelling, Expert Syst. Appl. 144 (2020) 113098. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
33. Y. Karaca and C. Cattani, Model estimation with SVM kernel types for cognitive diagnostics, Adv. Math. Models Appl. 4 (2019) 5–14. Google Scholar
34. Y. Karaca et al., Stroke subtype clustering by multifractal Bayesian denoising with fuzzy C means and K-means algorithms, Complexity 2018 (2018) 9034647. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
35. R. Ahmad et al., Steady flow of a power law fluid through a tapered non-symmetric stenotic tube, Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci. 4 (2019) 249–260. Google Scholar
36. R. Ahmad et al., Analysis of transport and mixing phenomenon to invariant manifolds using LCS and KAM theory approach in unsteady dynamical systems, IEEE Access 8 (2020) 141057–141065. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
37. Y. Karaca et al., Rank determination of mental functions by 1D wavelets and partial correlation, J. Med. Syst. 41 (2017) 1–10. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
38. A. Sohail, Y. Zhang and G. Bary, Tunable optomechanically induced transparency and Fano resonance in optomechanical system with levitated nanosphere, Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 57 (2018) 2814–2827. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
39. R. Ahmad et al., An analytical approach to study the blood flow over a nonlinear tapering stenosed artery in flow of Carreau fluid model measles, Complexity 2021 (2021) 9921642. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
40. G. Bary, W. Ahmed and M. Sajid, A new analytical approach to study chaos fraction characterization by using intensity interferometry, Chaos Solitons Fractals 152 (2021) 111414. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
41. G. Bary, L. Ghani and M. I. Jamil, Designing small organic non-fullerene acceptor molecules with diflorobenzene or quinoline core and dithiophene donor moiety through density functional theory, Sci. Rep. 11 (2021) 1–11. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
42. G. Bary, W. Ahmed and M. Sajid, An efficient analysis of difference equations with coherence fraction under the influence of boson interferometry, Fractals 30 (2021) 2240039. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar

Vol. 30, No. 05

Metrics

Downloaded 147 times

History

Received 15 June 2021

Accepted 23 November 2021

Published: May 5, 2022

Information

This is an Open Access article in the “Special Issue Section on Fractal AI-Based Analyses and Applications to Complex Systems: Part III”, edited by Yeliz Karaca (University of Massachusetts Medical School, USA), Dumitru Baleanu (Cankaya University, Turkey), Majaz Moonis (University of Massachusetts Medical School, USA), Yu-Dong Zhang (University of Leicester, UK) & Osvaldo Gervasi (Perugia University, Italy) published by World Scientific Publishing Company. It is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 (CC-BY-NC-ND) License which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Keywords

PDF download

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

A QUANTUM FRACTALS THEORY OF THE PIONS CHAOS AND THEIR FUTURISTIC APPLICATIONS WITH GRANULAR SOURCES

Abstract

Recommended