Special Issue on Numerical Methods for Vibro–Acoustics and Aeroacoustics; Edited by S. Marburg and M. OchmannOpen Access

More Than Six Elements Per Wavelength: The Practical Use of Structural Finite Element Models and Their Accuracy in Comparison with Experimental Results

P. Langer

Chair of Vibroacoustics of Vehicles and Machines, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technische Universität München, Boltzmannstraße 15, 85748 Garching, Germany

E-mail Address: P.Langer@tum.de

Search for more papers by this author

M. Maeder

Chair of Vibroacoustics of Vehicles and Machines, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technische Universität München, Boltzmannstraße 15, 85748 Garching, Germany

Search for more papers by this author

C. Guist

BMW Group, 80788 Munich, Germany

Search for more papers by this author

M. Krause

ISKO engineers AG, 80807 Munich, Germany

Search for more papers by this author

, and

S. Marburg

Chair of Vibroacoustics of Vehicles and Machines, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technische Universität München, Boltzmannstraße 15, 85748 Garching, Germany

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218396X17500254Cited by:63 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

Choosing the right number and type of elements in modern commercial finite element tools is a challenging task. It requires a broad knowledge about the theory behind or much experience by the user. Benchmark tests are a common method to prove the element performance against analytical solutions. However, these tests often analyze the performance only for single elements. When investigating the complete mesh of an arbitrary structure, the comparison of the element’s performance is quite challenging due to the lack of closed or fully converged solutions. The purpose of this paper is to show a high-precision comparison of eigenfrequencies of a real structure between experimental and numerical results in the context of an element performance check with respect to a converged solution. Additionally, the authors identify the practically relevant accuracy of simulation and experiment. Finally, the influence of accuracy with respect to the number of elements per standing structural bending wave is shown.

Keywords:

References

1. K.-J. Bathe, Finite Element Procedures (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, NJ, USA, 1996). Google Scholar
2. F. Koschnick, Geometric locking phenomena of finite elements and a uniform concept for their elimination, Dissertation, Technische Universität München, Germany (2004). Google Scholar
3. J. Argyris and H.-P. Mlejnek, Die Methode der Finiten Elemente (Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1988). Google Scholar
4. N. Maia, J. Silva, N. Lieven, G. Skingle, W. To and A. Urgueira, Theoretical and Experimental Modal Analysis (Research Studies Press Ltd., Hertfordshire, 1998). Google Scholar
5. D. G. Crighton, A. P. Dowling, J. E. Ffowcs, M. Heckl and L. F. A. , Modern Methods in Analytical Acoustics (Lecture Notes) (Springer-Verlag, London, 1992). Crossref, Google Scholar
6. M. Kompella and R. Bernhard, Variation of structural-acoustic characteristics of automotive vehicles, Noise Control Eng. J. 44 (1996) 93–99. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. E. Hills, B. R. Mace and N. S. Ferguson, Acoustic response variability in automotive vehicles, J. Sound Vib. 321 (2009) 286–304. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
8. M. Hornikx, M. Kaltenbacher and S. Marburg, A platform for benchmark cases in computational acoustics, Acta Acust. United with Acust. 101 (2015) 811–820. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. S. Marburg, H.-J. Beer, J. Gier, H.-J. Hardtke, R. Rennert and F. Perret, Experimental verification of structural acoustic modeling and design optimization, J. Sound Vib. 252 (2002) 591–615. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. A. Cifuentes and A. Kalbag, A performance study of tetrahedral and hexahedral elements in 3D finite element structural analysis, Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 12 (1992) 313–318. Crossref, Google Scholar
11. N.-S. Lee and K.-J. Bathe, Effects of element distortions on the performance of isoparametric elements, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 36(20) (1993) 3553–3576. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. P. Langer, K. Sepahvand, M. Krause and S. Marburg, Simple vibroacoustic systems — Influence of uncertainties in simulation and experiment, in Proc. NOVEM 2015, ed. G. Pavic (Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2015). Google Scholar
13. I. Babuška, F. Ihlenburg, T. Paik and A. Sauter, A generalized finite element methode for solving the Helmholtz equation in two dimensions with minimal pollution, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 128 (1995) 325–359. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
14. F. Ihlenburg, Finite Element Analysis of Acoustic Scattering (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998). Crossref, Google Scholar
15. L. L. Thompson and P. M. Pinsky, Complex wave number Fourier analysis of the $p$ $p$ -version finite element method, Comput. Mech. 13 (1994) 255. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
16. E. H. Ooi, H. Dogan and V. Popov, Dispersion analysis of the meshless local boundary integral equation and radial basis integral equation methods for the Helmholtz equation, J. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 50 (2015) 360–371. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
17. S. Marburg and S. Schneider, Influence of element types on numeric error for acoustic boundary elements, J. Comput. Acoust. 11 (2003) 363–386. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
18. S. Marburg, Six boundary elements per wavelength: Is that enough? J. Comput. Acoust. 10 (2002) 25–51. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
19. S. Marburg, The Burton and Miller method: Unlocking another mystery of its coupling parameter, J. Comput. Acoust. 24 (2015) 20. Web of Science, Google Scholar
20. M. Newman and A. Pipano, Fast modal extraction in NASTRAN via the FEER computer program, NASA. Langley Res. Center NASTRAN: Users Experiences (1973), pp. 485–506. Google Scholar
21. B. N. Parlett, The Symmetric Eigenvalue Problem (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, NJ, USA, 1980). Google Scholar
22. J. H. Wilkinson, The Algebraic Eigenvalue Problem, (Numerical Mathematics and Scientific Computation) (Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, 1999). Google Scholar
23. K.-J. Bathe and E. Wilson, Solution methods for eigenvalue problems in structural mechanics, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 6 (1972) 213–226. Crossref, Google Scholar
24. D. S. Simulia, ABAQUS V6.10 Documentation (2010). Google Scholar
25. K. J. Bathe, Finite Element Procedures in Engineering Analysis (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, NJ, 1982). Google Scholar
26. O. C. Zienkiewicz and R. L. Taylor, The Finite Elemente Methode Volume 1: Basic Formulation and Linear Problems (MacGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1989). Google Scholar
27. O. C. Zienkiewicz and R. L. Taylor, The Finite Element Method Volume 2: Solid and Fluid Mechanics, Dynamics and Non-Linearity (MacGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1991). Google Scholar
28. J. Barlow, Optimal stress locations in finite element models, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 10(2) (1976) 243–251. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
29. R. C. Averill and J. N. Reddy, Behaviour of plate elements based on the first-order shear deformation theory, Eng. Comput. 7 (1990) 57–74. Crossref, Google Scholar
30. J. N. Reddy, On locking-free shear deformable beam finite elements, Comput. Methods Appl. Mechan. Eng. 149(1–4) (1997) 113–132. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
31. G. Prathap and G. R. Bhashyam, Reduced integration and the shear flexible beam element, J. Numer. Methods Eng. 18 (1982) 195–210. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
32. D. J. Ewins, Modal Testing: Theory and Practice (Research Studies Press, Letchworth, Hertfordshire, England, 1984). Google Scholar
33. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Methods for the Experimental Determination of Mechanical Mobility; Parts 1–5 (Switzerland, 1986–1994). Google Scholar
34. I. Vibrant Technology, ME’scope Version 5.0 Operating Manual (2009). Google Scholar
35. P. Langer, K. Sepahvand and S. Marburg, Uncertainty quantification in analytical and finite element beam models using experimental data, in Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2014, eds. A. Cunha, E. Caetano, P. Ribeiro and G. Müller (Porto, Portugal, 2014). Google Scholar
36. I. Babuška and S. A. Sauter, Is the pollution effect of the FEM avoidable for the Helmholtz equation considering high wave number? SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 34 (1997) 2392–2423. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
37. F. Ihlenburg and I. Babuška, Finite element solution of the Helmholtz equation with high wavenumber Part I: The h-version of the FEM, Comput. Math. Appl. 30 (1995) 9–37. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
38. F. Ihlenburg and I. Babuška, Finite element solution of the Helmholtz equation with high wavenumber Part II: The h-version of the FEM, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 34 (1997) 315–358. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
39. M. Ainsworth, Discrete dispersion relation for hp-version finite element approximation at high wave number, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 42 (2004) 553–575. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
40. I. Babuška, F. Ihlenburg, E. Paik and S. A. Sauter, A generalized finite element method for solving the Helmholtz equation in two dimensions with minimal pollution, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 128 (1995) 325–359. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
41. S. Marburg, Normal modes in external acoustics. Part I: Investigation of the one-dimensional duct problem, Acta Acust. United Acust. 91 (1986) 1063–1078. Google Scholar
42. A. A. Oberai and P. M. Pinsky, A numerical comparison of finite element methods for the Helmholtz equation, J. Comput. Acoust. 8 (2000) 211–221. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
43. E. Q. Sun, Shear locking and hourglassing in MSC Nastran, ABAQUS, and ANSYS, MSC.Software Virtual Product Development Conference (VPD 2006), Huntington, CA., July 17–19 (2006). Google Scholar
44. T. Belytschko, H. Stolarski, W. K. Liu, N. Carpenter and J. Ong, Stress projections for membrane and shear locking in shell finite elements, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 51(1–3) (1985) 221–258. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
45. I. Babuska and M. Suri, On locking and robustness in the finite element method, Report BN-1112, Inst. for Physical Sci. and Tech., University of Maryland, College Park Campus, May 1990. Google Scholar
46. S. S. Ramesh, K.-M. Lim and B. C. Khoo, Comparison of constant and discontinuous quadratic boundary elements for exterior axisymmetric acoustic-wave propagation problems, J. Comput. Acoust. 23 (2015) 22. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar

Vol. 25, No. 04

Metrics

Downloaded 4,612 times

History

Received 13 May 2016

Revised 21 February 2017

Published: 29 March 2017

Information

This is an Open Access article published by World Scientific Publishing Company. It is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY) License. Further distribution of this work is permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.

Keywords

PDF download

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

More Than Six Elements Per Wavelength: The Practical Use of Structural Finite Element Models and Their Accuracy in Comparison with Experimental Results

Abstract

Recommended