Processing math: 100%
World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

THE INFLUENCE OF THE SURFACE ORIENTATION ON THE MORPHOLOGY DURING HOMOEPITAXIAL GROWTH OF NICKEL BY MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218625X17500196Cited by:18 (Source: Crossref)

    Homoepitaxial growth film for (001), (110) and (111) Ni substrates is investigated by means of molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. Embedded atom method (EAM) is considered to represent the interaction potential between nickel atoms. The simulation is performed at 300K using an incident energy of 0.06eV. In this study, the deposition process is performed periodically and the period, n, is relative to a perfect layer filling. The coverage rate of the actual expected level, L(n), can be considered a determinant for thin-film growth of nickel. The L(n) level is the most filled level during the deposition on (001) substrate, while it is the less filled one in the case of (111) substrate. Moreover, the upper level is the one which is responsible for the surface roughness and the appearance time of an upper layer may also be a factor influencing the surface roughness. The deposition on (111) substrate induces the most rigorous surface with a rapid appearance time of the upper layers. The L(n1) layers are almost completely filled for all substrates. The L(n2) and lower layers are completely filled for (001) and (110) substrates while for (111) substrate the completely filled layers are L(n3) and lower ones.