World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

INVESTIGATION OF ELECTROEROSION MACHINING PERFORMANCE OF METAL MATRIX COMPOSITE MATERIALS PRODUCED USING STIR AND INDIRECT SQUEEZE METHOD

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218625X24500513Cited by:2 (Source: Crossref)

    In this study, metal matrix composite (MMC) materials were made with an aluminum matrix (AA7075 alloy) and reinforcement silicon carbide (SiC) elements using molten metal stir and indirect squeeze casting. SiC was used as a reinforcing element in the making of MMC material in different amounts (10%, 14%, and 18%) by mass. Electro Discharge Machining (EDM), cut depth (0.5 mm), three different pulse-on times, three different discharge current values, and a fixed pulse-off time (20 s) were used to machine MMC materials. The effects of machining parameters on machining time, average surface roughness, hole diameter, and material wear difference after machining were studied. As a result of the study, the composite material with 75 μs pulse-on time, 6A current value, and 10% reinforcement element had the lowest machining time, the largest hole diameter, and the smoothest average surface. These machining parameters and materials also had the shortest machining time (5 min). Based on the signal-to-noise ratios, the best parameters for average surface roughness, hole diameter, Processing time, and material wear amount (MMC, discharge current value, and impact time) were found to be L2L1L1, L3L1L1, L1L3L3, and L1L1L2, respectively. Based on the ANOVA results, the R2 values for the average surface roughness, hole diameter, machining time, and material wear loss value were 99.3%, 98.7%, 77.8%, and 97.3%, respectively.