World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218625X2550091XCited by:0 (Source: Crossref)

The demand for precision machining in high-strength materials has led to increased interest in understanding the electro-discharge machining (EDM) behavior of welded joints in industrial applications. This study explores the effects of key EDM parameters, such as electrode material, peak current, and pulse duration, on AISI 1541H welded joints. It evaluates the material removal rate (MRR), tool wear rate (TWR), surface roughness (SR), and microstructure, revealing important correlations between EDM settings and the quality of machined surfaces. The study investigates the machining characteristics of oxy-acetylene gas (OAG) and tungsten-inert gas (TIG) welded samples across the fusion zone (FZ), heat-affected zone (HAZ), and unaffected zone (UAZ). For the OAG-welded sample, MRR in the FZ was 15.077mg/min which is less than the MRR of HAZ, and UAZ. It was fine-grain structure has a high MRR in comparison to Coarse grain. Whereas, TWR was 0.22mg/min, 0.32mg/min, and 0.185mg/min in the FZ, HAZ and UAZ respectively. SR values were found Lowest in UAZ at 7.11μm, and SR was reported at 8.33μm in FZ, and 7.32μm in HAZ. Measured microhardness values were 196 HV0.5 in FZ which is 6.2% higher than the microhardness of HAZ. Similar trends were observed in the TIG welded sample, where the MRR was 17.113mg/min (FZ), 17.436mg/min (HAZ), and 17.811mg/min in UAZ. The study reveals that TIG-welded joints outperform OAG joints in terms of machining performance, material removal rates (MRRs), hardness, and surface finish due to lower porosity and better grain distribution whereas the OAG process shows microporosity due to shielding limitations.