World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

OPTIMIZATIONS FOR TENSORIAL BERNSTEIN–BASED SOLVERS BY USING POLYHEDRAL BOUNDS

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218654310001304Cited by:1 (Source: Crossref)

    The tensorial Bernstein basis for multivariate polynomials in n variables has a number 3n of functions for degree 2. Consequently, computing the representation of a multivariate polynomial in the tensorial Bernstein basis is an exponential time algorithm, which makes tensorial Bernstein-based solvers impractical for systems with more than n = 6 or 7 variables. This article describes a polytope (Bernstein polytope) with a number of faces, which allows to bound a sparse, multivariate polynomial expressed in the canonical basis by solving several linear programming problems. We compare the performance of a subdivision solver using domain reductions by linear programming with a solver using a change to the tensorial Bernstein basis for domain reduction. The performance is similar for n = 2 variables but only the solver using linear programming on the Bernstein polytope can cope with a large number of variables. We demonstrate this difference with two formulations of the forward kinematics problem of a Gough-Stewart parallel robot: a direct Cartesian formulation and a coordinate-free formulation using Cayley-Menger determinants, followed by a computation of Cartesian coordinates. Furthermore, we present an optimization of the Bernstein polytope-based solver for systems containing only the monomials xi and . For these, it is possible to obtain even better domain bounds at no cost using the quadratic curve (xi, ) directly.

    AMSC: 14Q15, 14Q20, 65G40