World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

INTRA-TENDON SHEATH INJECTION FOR TRIGGER FINGER: THE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218810407003535Cited by:21 (Source: Crossref)

    The most common technique used for non-surgical treatment of trigger fingers is the direct injection of steroids into the flexor tendon sheath over the metacarpal head. However, this method causes more pian to the patient and can result in tendon rupture due to insertion of needle into the tendon. Carlson and Curtis described the mid-axial injection technique which is simple and relatively painless. We aim to compare the pain result from the injection between these two methods. The prospective randomised control trial study was designed. There were 103 trigger fingers included in the study which were divided into two groups: the conventional technique of injection (CI technique) and the mid-axial injection technique (MAI technique). The visual analogue scale for pain score had been recorded at the time of injection: one, three and six weeks. The complication after injection and the recurrent symptoms within one year were also recorded. The Student's t-test, Chi-squared and Fisher-exact analysis were used for statistical testing. The results showed that the mean VAS pain scores immediately after needle insertion were 40.19 ± 23.3 and 48.39 ± 26.5 in the MAI and CI technique groups, respectively. The MAI technique was less painful than the CI technique (p < 0.05). There were no complications from the injections in both methods. However, the recurrent rate seems to be higher in the conventional technique (p = 0.23). We concluded that the MAI injection technique provided less pain result than the CI technique and there were no complications from this injection technique.