No Access

INTEROPERABLE SUPPLY-CHAIN APPLICATIONS: MESSAGE METAMODEL-BASED SEMANTIC RECONCILIATION OF B2B MESSAGES

Manufacturing Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA

Search for more papers by this author

EDWARD BARKMEYER

Manufacturing Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA

Search for more papers by this author

NENAD IVEZIC

Manufacturing Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA

Search for more papers by this author

, and

ZORAN MARJANOVIC

Department of Information Systems, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade Jove Ilica 154, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218843010002103Cited by:3 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

Supply-chain applications exchange numerous electronic business-to-business (B2B) messages of varied types. Traditionally, prior to a message exchange, partners adopt one particular message specification that constrains message structure and syntax to implement compatible application message interfaces. However, in open, dynamic supply-chains, the applications need to interact even though their message interfaces are based on different, yet incompatible message specifications. To achieve such interactions, we propose the Message Metamodel-based semantic reconciliation of B2B messages. The Message Metamodel is a novel, ontological form that provides for common representation of B2B message specifications and messages of various syntaxes, such as Extensible Markup Language (XML) or Electronic Data Interchange (EDI). The experimental investigation showed that proposed semantic reconciliation architecture built atop the Message Metamodel (1) insulates the reconciliation activities from the specific message syntaxes, (2) supports the reconciliation of messages irrespective of message standards used, and (3) enables seamless interoperable message exchange between heterogeneous supply-chain applications.

Keywords:

References

D. M. Lambert, M. C. Cooper and J. D. Pagh, The Int. Journal of Logistics Management 9(2), 1 (1998), DOI: 10.1108/09574099810805807. Google Scholar
United Nations Directories for Electronic Data Interchange for Administration, Commerce and Transport (EDIFACT), online at www.unece.org/trade/untdid/, accessed August 2008 . Google Scholar
Open Application Group Integration Specification (OAGIS), online at http://www.oag.org/, accessed April 2009 . Google Scholar
Extensible Markup Language (XML), online at www.w3.org/XML/, accessed August 2008 . Google Scholar
M. Kantor and H. B. James, Electronic Data Interchange (EDI), National Institute of Standards and Technology (1996) online at www.itl.nist.gov/fipspubs/fip161-2.htm/, accessed August 2008 . Google Scholar
Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1), online at http://asn1.elibel.tm.fr/, accessed August 2008 . Google Scholar
ATHENA Knowledge Support and Semantic Mediation Solutions — Deliverables D.A3.2-D.A3.5, January 2006, online at www.modelbased.net/aif/, accessed August 2008 . Google Scholar
M. Vujasinovicet al., Int. Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 22(6), 549 (2009), DOI: 10.1080/09511920802616781. Web of Science, Google Scholar
S.-C. Oh and S.-T. Yee, Int. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 39, 199 (2008), DOI: 10.1007/s00170-007-1198-2. Web of Science, Google Scholar
S. Ray and A. Jones, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 17(6), 681 (2006), DOI: 10.1007/s10845-006-0037-x. Web of Science, Google Scholar
O. Fodor and H. Werthner, Int. Journal of Electronic Commerce 9(2), 11 (2004). Google Scholar
B. Chandrasekaran, J. R. Josephson and V. R. Benjamins, IEEE Intelligent Systems 14(1), 20 (1999), DOI: 10.1109/5254.747902. Web of Science, Google Scholar
T. R. Gruber, Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199 (1993), DOI: 10.1006/knac.1993.1008. Google Scholar
Unified Modeling Language, UML, online at http://www.uml.org/, accessed August 2008 . Google Scholar
Web ontology Language (OWL), online at www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/, accessed August 2008 . Google Scholar
ISO/IEC 19502 Meta Object Facility (MOF), online at www.omg.org/spec/MOF/, accessed August 2008 . Google Scholar
A. Hameed, A. D. Preece and D. H. Sleeman, Handbook on Ontologies (Springer, 2004) pp. 231–250. Google Scholar
N. Anicicet al., Int. Journal of Manufacturing and Technology 10(3), 205 (2007), DOI: 10.1504/IJMTM.2007.011850. Web of Science, Google Scholar
V. Biceret al., SIGMOD Record 34(3), 71 (2005), DOI: 10.1145/1084805.1084819. Google Scholar
Y. Yeet al., Int. Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 21(1), 1 (2007), DOI: 10.1080/09511920601182225. Web of Science, Google Scholar
RDF Vocabulary Description Language (RDF Schema), online at www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/, accessed August 2008 . Google Scholar
H. Bohring and S. Auer, Mapping XML to OWL Ontologies. Marktplatz Internet: Von e-Learning bis e-Payment. Leipziger Informatik-Tage (LIT2005), Leipzig, Germany, (2005), pp. 147–156 . Google Scholar
I. Mileticet al., Enabling semantic mediation for business applications: XML-RDF, RDF-XML, and XSD-RDFS transformation, Proc. of the Int'l Conf. IESA (Springer, 2007) pp. 483–494. Google Scholar
J. Euzenat and P. Shvaiko , Ontology Matching ( Springer , 2007 ) . Google Scholar
P. Snack, Standards-based interoperability: The road ahead, AIAG Actionline (July/August 2007), pp. 21–29 . Google Scholar
E. Barkmeyer and B. Kulvatunyou, An ontology for the e-Kanban business process, NIST Internal Report 7404, National Institute of Standards and Technology, online at www.mel.nist.gov/msidlibrary/doc/NISTIR_7404.pdf/, accessed August 2008 . Google Scholar
Turtle — Terse RDF Triple Language, online at www.dajobe.org/2004/01/turtle/, accessed August 2008 . Google Scholar
Meta-Mesager Web page, http://meta-messager.sourceforge.net, accessed August 2008 . Google Scholar
Jena rule language, online at http://jena.sourceforge.net/, accessed August 2008 . Google Scholar
C. L. Forgy, Artificial Intelligence 19(1), 17 (1982), DOI: 10.1016/0004-3702(82)90020-0. Web of Science, Google Scholar
G. Vetere and M. Lenzerini, IBM Systems Journal 44(4), 887 (2005), DOI: 10.1147/sj.444.0887. Web of Science, Google Scholar
A. Maedcheet al., MAFRA — A mapping framework for distributed ontologies, Proc. of the EKAW 20022473, LNCS (Springer, 2002) pp. 235–250. Google Scholar
I. Horrocks, H. Patel-Schneider Boley, S. Tabet, B. Grosf and M. Dean, SWRL: A semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML, WWW Consortium Member Submission, online at www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/, accessed August 2008 . Google Scholar
D. Kenscheet al., GeRoMe: A generic role based metamodel for model management, Proc. of the 4th Int'l Conf. on Ontologies, Databases, and Applications of Semantics (ODBASE)3761, LNCS (2005) pp. 1206–1224. Google Scholar
S. Melnik, E. Rahm and P. A. Bernstein, Rondo: A programming platform for model management, Proc. of the 22nd Int'l Conf. on Management of Data (SIGMOD) (2003) pp. 193–204. Google Scholar
S. Bowers and L. Delcamre, Representing and transforming model based information, Proc. of the 4th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Library (ECDL-2000) (2000) pp. 5–18. Google Scholar
XML Schema Definition API, online at www.eclipse.org/xsd/, accessed August 2008 . Google Scholar
Document Object Model (DOM), online at www.w3.org/DOM/, accessed August 2008 . Google Scholar
JavaScript Object Notation (JSON), online at www.json.org/, accessed August 2008 . Google Scholar
D. Foxvog and C. Bussler, Ontologizing EDI: First steps and initial experience, Proc. of the Int'l Workshop on Data Engineering Issues in E-Commerce (2005) pp. 49–58. Google Scholar
Y. Yarimagan and A. Dogac, IEEE Internet Computing 13(3), 64 (2009), DOI: 10.1109/MIC.2009.50. Web of Science, Google Scholar
S. Karthick , Ontologizing XML using mediation patterns , First International Workshop on Ontologizing Industrial Standards OIS 2006 ( 2006 ) . Google Scholar
The Web Service Modeling Language WSML, online at www.wsmo.org/TR/d16/d16.1/v0.2/, accessed August 2008 . Google Scholar
J. Kopeckyet al., IEEE Internet Computing 11(6), 60 (2007), DOI: 10.1109/MIC.2007.134. Web of Science, Google Scholar
K. Verma and A. Sheth, IEEE Internet Computing 11(2), 83 (2007), DOI: 10.1109/MIC.2007.48. Web of Science, Google Scholar
A. Patilet al., Meteor-s web service annotation framework, Proc. of the 13 Int. Conf. on WWW (2004) pp. 553–562. Google Scholar
XSL Transformations (XSLT) Version 1.0, online at http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt, accessed August 2008 . Google Scholar
XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language, online at http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/, accessed August 2008 . Google Scholar
SPARQL Query Language for RDF, online at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/, accessed August 2008 . Google Scholar
D. Libes, E. Barkmeyer, P. Denno, D. Flater, M. P. Steves, E. Wallace and A. B. Feeney, The AMIS Approach to Systems Integration, NIST Internal Report 7101, National Institute of Standards and Technology, online at www.mel.nist.gov/msidlibrary/doc/nistir7101.pdf/, accessed August 2008 . Google Scholar
S. A. McIlraithet al., IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(2), 46 (2001), DOI: 10.1109/5254.920599. Web of Science, Google Scholar
A. Halleret al., WSMX — A semantic service-oriented architecture, Proc. of the 2005 Int. Conf. on Web Services1 (2005) pp. 321–328. Google Scholar
D. Flater, Automated Composition of Conversion Software, NIST Internal Report 7099, (2004) online at www.mel.nist.gov/msidlibrary/doc/nistir7099.pdf/, accessed August 2008 . Google Scholar
M. Vujasinovic and E. Barkmeyer, Message Metamodel, NIST Internal Report, National Institute of Standards and Technology (2009), online at http://meta-messager.sourceforge.net/resources/MMM_NISTIRXX.pdf, accessed August 2008 . Google Scholar