World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

IMPACT OF PAIN ON SHOULDER ELEVATION VELOCITY IN PATIENTS WITH ROTATOR CUFF TEARS

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218957710002429Cited by:3 (Source: Crossref)

    Pain is routinely implicated as a factor when considering impaired movement in injured populations. Movement velocity is often considered during the rehabilitation process; unfortunately our understanding of pain's impact on shoulder movement velocity in rotator cuff tear patients is less understood. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that there would be an increase in peak and mean shoulder elevation velocities following the decrease of shoulder pain in rotator cuff tear patients, regardless of tear size. Fifteen subjects with full-thickness rotator cuff tears (RCT) performed humeral elevation and lowering in three planes before and after receiving a lidocaine injection to relieve pain. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale. Humeral elevation velocity data were collected using an electromagnetic tracking system. A significant reduction in pain (pre-injection 3.53 ± 1.99; post-injection 1.23 ± 1.43) resulted in significant increases in maximum and mean humeral elevation velocities. Mean shoulder elevation and lowering velocities increased 15.10 ± 2.45% while maximum shoulder movement velocities increased 12.77 ± 3.93%. Furthermore, no significant relationships were noted between tear size and movement velocity. These significant increases in movement velocity provide evidence to further support the notion that human motion can be inhibited by injury-associated pain, and that by reducing that pain through clinical interventions, human movement can be impacted in a positive fashion.