Review PaperNo Access

Metallic Yielding Dampers and Fluid Viscous Dampers for Vibration Control in Civil Engineering: A Review

Renkang Hu

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2993-8954

School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, P. R. China

E-mail Address: cehrkang@csu.edu.cn

Renkang Hu and Shangtao Hu are co-first authors.

Search for more papers by this author

Shangtao Hu

School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, P. R. China

E-mail Address: sthu1997@csu.edu.cn

Renkang Hu and Shangtao Hu are co-first authors.

Search for more papers by this author

Menggang Yang

School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, P. R. China

E-mail Address: mgyang@csu.edu.cn

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

, and

Yu Zhang

School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, P. R. China

E-mail Address: yz1999@csu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455422300063Cited by:24 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

Structural vibration is a widespread issue occurred in the field of civil engineering. The passive energy dissipation devices are being increasingly popular for protecting structures from external excitations due to their high performance and no need for external energy. They can be divided into displacement-dependent dampers and velocity-dependent dampers, among which the metallic yielding dampers (MYDs) and fluid viscous dampers (FVDs) are the most representative. This paper presents an overview of the MYD and FVD, aiming to reveal their defects and provide suggestions for future development. The basic concept, the mechanical models, the design approaches, and the applications in civil engineering of the two dampers are reviewed. In particular, the obstacles in application and preference in research of these two dampers are summarized, and their merits and drawbacks are further discussed. Emphatically, the strategies for improvement and future development trends are explored.

Keywords:

Remember to check out the Most Cited Articles!
Remember to check out the structures

References

1. M. Sofi, E. Lumantarna, C. Duffield and P. Mendis, Effects of interior partition walls on natural period of high rise buildings, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 17(6) (2017) 1771006. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
2. Y. Xu, Making good use of structural health monitoring systems of long-span cable-supported bridges, J. Civ. Struct. Health 8(3) (2018) 477–497. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
3. H. Wang, T. Tao, Y. Gao and F. Xu, Measurement of wind effects on a kilometer-level cable-stayed bridge during Typhoon Haikui, J. Struct. Eng. 144(9) (2018) 4018142. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
4. G. Housner, L. A. Bergman, T. K. Caughey, A. G. Chassiakos, R. O. Claus, S. F. Masri, R. E. Skelton, T. T. Soong, B. F. Spencer and J. T. Yao, Structural control: Past, present, and future, J. Eng. Mech. 123(9) (1997) 897–971. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
5. B. F. Spencer and S. Nagarajaiah, State of the art of structural control, J. Struct. Eng. 129(7) (2003) 845–856. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
6. H. Xu, C. Zhang, H. Li, P. Tan, J. Ou and F. Zhou, Active mass driver control system for suppressing wind-induced vibration of the Canton Tower, Smart Struct. Syst. 13 (2014) 281–303. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. Z. Q. Chen, X. Y. Wang, J. M. Ko, Y. Q. Ni, B. F. Spencer, G. Yang and J. H. Hu, MR damping system for mitigating wind-rain induced vibration on Dongting Lake Cable-Stayed Bridge, Wind. Struct. An Int. J. 7 (2004) 293–304. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
8. M. Jafari and A. Alipour, Methodologies to mitigate wind-induced vibration of tall buildings: A state-of-the-art review, J. Build. Eng. 33 (2021) 101582. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. M. Gutierrez Soto and H. Adeli, Tuned mass dampers, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 20(4) (2013) 419–431. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. S. Elias and V. Matsagar, Research developments in vibration control of structures using passive tuned mass dampers, Annu. Rev. Control 44 (2017) 129–156. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. Y. Luo, H. Sun, X. Wang, L. Zuo and N. Chen, Wind induced vibration control and energy harvesting of electromagnetic resonant shunt tuned mass-damper-inerter for building structures, Shock Vib. 2017 (2017) 1–13. Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. W. Wang, X. Wang, X. Hua, G. Song and Z. Chen, Vibration control of vortex-induced vibrations of a bridge deck by a single-side pounding tuned mass damper, Eng. Struct. 173 (2018) 61–75. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
13. A. Javanmardi, Z. Ibrahim, K. Ghaedi, H. Benisi Ghadim and M. U. Hanif, State-of-the-art review of metallic dampers: Testing, development and implementation, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 27(2) (2020) 455–478. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
14. D. De Domenico, G. Ricciardi and I. Takewaki, Design strategies of viscous dampers for seismic protection of building structures: A review, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 118 (2019) 144–165. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
15. C. Uang, M. Nakashima and K. Tsai, Research and application of buckling-restrained braced frames, Int. J. Steel Struct. 4 (2004) 301–313. Google Scholar
16. G. Della Corte, M. D. Aniello, R. Landolfo and F. M. Mazzolani, Review of steel buckling-restrained braces, Steel Constr. 4 (2011) 85–93. Crossref, Google Scholar
17. J. Tan, P. Zhang, Q. Feng and G. Song, Passive seismic protection of building piping systems—A review, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 20(3) (2020) 2030001. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
18. Y. Zhuge, X. Ma and J. Zeng, Recent progress in buckling restrained braces: A review on material development and selection, Adv. Struct. Eng. 25(7) (2022) 796478570. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
19. T. E. Saaed, G. Nikolakopoulos, J. Jonasson and H. Hedlund, A state-of-the-art review of structural control systems, J. Vib. Control 21(5) (2015) 919–937. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
20. K. Ghaedi, Z. Ibrahim, H. Adeli and A. Javanmardi, Invited Review: Recent developments in vibration control of building and bridge structures, J. Vibroeng. 19(5) (2017) 3564–3580. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
21. D. Lee and D. P. Taylor, Viscous damper development and future trends, Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build. 10(5) (2001) 311–320. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
22. L. He, X. Sun, H. Bu and Z. Tang, Seismic performance of MRSF structures damped with steel slit shear panels, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 22(3) (2022) 2240013. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
23. M. R. Shirinkam and J. Razzaghi, Experimental and analytical investigation on the behavior of metallic Box-Shaped Dampers (BSD), Structures 23 (2020) 766–778. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
24. J. Kim and J. Jeong, Seismic retrofit of asymmetric structures using steel plate slit dampers, J. Constr. Steel Res. 120 (2016) 232–244. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. Z. Chen, H. Ge and T. Usami, Hysteretic model of stiffened shear panel dampers, J. Struct. Eng. 132(3) (2006) 478–483. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
26. S. M. Zahrai, Cyclic testing of chevron braced steel frames with IPE shear panels, Steel Compos. Struct. 19(5) (2015) 1167–1184. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
27. R. W. Chan, F. Albermani and M. S. Williams, Evaluation of yielding shear panel device for passive energy dissipation, J. Constr. Steel Res. 65(2) (2009) 260–268. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
28. H. He, X. Wang and X. Zhang, Energy-dissipation performance of combined low yield point steel plate damper based on topology optimization and its application in structural control, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016 (2016) 5654619. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
29. K. Deng, P. Pan, W. Li and Y. Xue, Development of a buckling restrained shear panel damper, J. Constr. Steel Res. 106 (2015) 311–321. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
30. R. W. Chan and F. Albermani, Experimental study of steel slit damper for passive energy dissipation, Eng. Struct. 30(4) (2008) 1058–1066. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
31. J. Zheng, A. Li and T. Guo, Analytical and experimental study on mild steel dampers with non-uniform vertical slits, Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 14(1) (2015) 111–123. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
32. C. Lee, Y. K. Ju, J. Min, S. Lho and S. Kim, Non-uniform steel strip dampers subjected to cyclic loadings, Eng. Struct. 99 (2015) 192–204. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
33. A. Naeem and J. Kim, Seismic performance evaluation of a multi-slit damper, Eng. Struct. 189 (2019) 332–346. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
34. S. Maleki and S. Bagheri, Pipe damper, Part I: Experimental and analytical study, J. Constr. Steel Res. 66(8–9) (2010) 1088–1095. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
35. S. Maleki and S. Bagheri, Pipe damper, Part II: Application to bridges, J. Constr. Steel Res. 66(8–9) (2010) 1096–1106. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
36. S. Maleki and S. Mahjoubi, Dual-pipe damper, J. Constr. Steel Res. 85 (2013) 81–91. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
37. S. Maleki and S. Mahjoubi, Infilled-pipe damper, J. Constr. Steel Res. 98 (2014) 45–58. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
38. S. M. Zahrai and A. Cheraghi, Reducing seismic vibrations of typical steel buildings using new multi-level yielding pipe damper, Int. J. Steel Struct. 17(3) (2017) 983–998. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
39. Z. Yao, W. Wang and Y. Zhu, Experimental evaluation and numerical simulation of low-yield-point steel shear panel dampers, Eng. Struct. 245 (2021) 112860. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
40. J. Choi and D. Y. Abebe, Hysteresis characteristics of shear panel damper using SLY120, APCBEE Procedia 9 (2014) 370–375. Crossref, Google Scholar
41. G. Brando, F. D. Agostino and G. De Matteis, Experimental tests of a new hysteretic damper made of buckling inhibited shear panels, Mater. Struct. 46(12) (2013) 2121–2133. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
42. G. De Matteis, F. M. Mazzolani and S. Panico, Pure aluminium shear panels as dissipative devices in moment-resisting steel frames, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36(7) (2007) 841–859. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
43. J. C. De la Llera, C. Esguerra and J. L. Almazán, Earthquake behavior of structures with copper energy dissipators, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 33(3) (2004) 329–358. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
44. C. Xia and R. D. Hanson, Influence of ADAS element parameters on building seismic response, J. Struct. Eng. 118(7) (1992) 1903–1918. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
45. A. S. Whittaker, V. V. Bertero, C. L. Thompson and L. J. Alonso, Seismic testing of steel plate energy dissipation devices, Earthq. Spectra 7(4) (1991) 563–604. Crossref, Google Scholar
46. U. Liyanage, T. N. Perera and H. Maneetes, Analysis of x-shaped and double x-shaped metallic dampers on multistorey frames, J. Univ. Ruhuna 7(1) (2020) 12–24. Crossref, Google Scholar
47. Y. Jiao, S. Kishiki, S. Yamada, D. Ene, Y. Konishi, Y. Hoashi and M. Terashima, Low cyclic fatigue and hysteretic behavior of U-shaped steel dampers for seismically isolated buildings under dynamic cyclic loadings, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44(10) (2015) 1523–1538. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
48. S. Kato, Y. Kim, S. Nakazawa and T. Ohya, Simulation of the cyclic behavior of J-shaped steel hysteresis devices and study on the efficiency for reducing earthquake responses of space structures, J. Constr. Steel Res. 61(10) (2005) 1457–1473. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
49. A. Marioni, Development of a new type of hysteretic damper for the seismic protection of bridges, Special Publication 164 (1996) 955–976. Google Scholar
50. S. Garivani, A. A. Aghakouchak and S. Shahbeyk, Numerical and experimental study of comb-teeth metallic yielding dampers, Int. J. Steel Struct. 16(1) (2016) 177–196. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
51. K. Ghaedi, Z. Ibrahim, A. Javanmardi and R. Rupakhety, Experimental study of a new bar damper device for vibration control of structures subjected to earthquake loads, J. Earthq. Eng. 25(2) (2021) 300–318. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
52. H. Hsu and H. Halim, Improving seismic performance of framed structures with steel curved dampers, Eng. Struct. 130 (2017) 99–111. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
53. A. Ghabussi, J. A. Marnani and M. S. Rohanimanesh, Seismic performance assessment of a novel ductile steel braced frame equipped with steel curved damper, Structures 31 (2021) 87–97. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
54. H. Gao and J. Wang, Research on differences between cylindrical and E-shaped dampers for the bidirectional seismic control, J. Bridge Eng. 25(4) (2020) 4020008. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
55. A. Naeem and J. Kim, Seismic retrofit of a framed structure using damped cable systems, Steel Compos. Struct. 29 (2018) 287–299. Web of Science, Google Scholar
56. A. Zhang, X. Liu, Y. Wang, Z. Shang, C. Yu and Z. Bai, Seismic behavior of an X-deployed cable-braced bolt-assembly steel frame, J. Constr. Steel Res. 170 (2020) 106132. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
57. X. Hou and H. Tagawa, Displacement-restraint bracing for seismic retrofit of steel moment frames, J. Constr. Steel Res. 65 (2009) 1096–1104. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
58. J. P. Judd and F. A. Charney, Seismic collapse prevention system for steel-frame buildings, J. Constr. Steel Res. 118 (2016) 60–75. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
59. M. Ghasemi, C. Zhang, H. Khorshidi and L. Sun, Seismic performance assessment of steel frames with slack cable bracing systems, Eng. Struct. 250 (2022) 113437. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
60. A. M. Billah, J. Rahman and Q. Zhang, Shape memory alloys (SMAs) for resilient bridges: A state-of-the-art review, Structures 37 (2022) 514–527. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
61. K. Kimura, K. Yoshioka, T. Takeda, Z. Fukuya and K. Takemoto, Tests on braces encased by mortar in-filled steel tubes, in Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting (Japan, 1976). Google Scholar
62. T. Takeuchi and A. Wada, Review of buckling-restrained brace design and application to tall buildings, Int. J. High-Rise Build. 7(3) (2018) 187–195. Google Scholar
63. K. Inoue and S. Sawaisumi, Bracing design criterion of the reinforced concrete panel including unbonded steel diagonal braces, J. Struct. Constr. Eng. 432(3) (1992) 41–49. Google Scholar
64. H. M. Yazdi, M. Mosalman and A. M. Soltani, Seismic study of buckling restrained brace system without concrete infill, Int. J. Steel Struct. 18(1) (2018) 153–162. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
65. F. Sun, G. Li, X. Guo, D. Hu and B. Hu, Development of new-type buckling-restrained braces and their application in aseismic steel frameworks, Adv. Struct. Eng. 14(4) (2011) 717–730. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
66. K. Tsai, J. Lai, Y. Hwang, S. Lin and C. Weng, Research and application of double-core buckling restrained braces in Taiwan (2004), in Proc. 13th World Conf. Earthquake Engineering (Canada, 2004). Google Scholar
67. D. Zhang, X. Nie, P. Pan, M. Wang, K. Deng and Y. Chen, Experimental study and finite element analysis of a buckling-restrained brace consisting of three steel tubes with slotted holes in the middle tube, J. Constr. Steel Res. 124 (2016) 1–11. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
68. Y. Zhou, C. Gong, Q. Chen and G. Q. Zhong, Experimental study on seismic performance of perforated steel-plate assembled buckling restrained brace, J. Build. Struct. 37(8) (2016) 101107. Google Scholar
69. C. Avci-Karatas, O. C. Celik and S. Ozmen Eruslu, Modeling of buckling restrained braces (BRBs) using full-scale experimental data, KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 23(10) (2019) 4431–4444. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
70. P. Liu, Y. Xu, Z. Wang and H. Ma, Research status and application of buckling restrained brace technology, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 11626 (2020) 12116. Google Scholar
71. D. H. Kim, C. H. Lee, Y. K. Ju and S. D. Kim, Subassemblage test of buckling-restrained braces with H-shaped steel core, Struct. Des. Tall Spec. 24(4) (2015) 243–256. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
72. U. Chia-Ming and N. Masayoshi, The practice and research development of buckling restrained braced frames, Prog. Steel Build. Struct. 7 (2005) 1–12. Google Scholar
73. F. Naeim and J. M. Kelly, Design of Seismic Isolated Structures: From Theory to Practice (John Wiley & Sons, 1999). Crossref, Google Scholar
74. T. Akazawa, M. Nakashima and O. Sakaguchi, Simple model for simulating hysteretic behavior involving significant strain hardening, in Eleventh World Conf. Earthquake Engineering (Japan, 1996). Google Scholar
75. W. D. Iwan and L. D. Lutes, Response of the bilinear hysteretic system to stationary random excitation, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 43(3) (1968) 545–552. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
76. Y. Wen, Method for random vibration of hysteretic systems, J. Eng. Mech. Div. 102(2) (1976) 249–263. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
77. T. Sireteanu, A. Mitu, M. Giuclea and O. Solomon, A comparative study of the dynamic behavior of Ramberg–Osgood and Bouc–Wen hysteresis models with application to seismic protection devices, Eng. Struct. 76 (2014) 255–269. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
78. F. Taiyari, F. M. Mazzolani and S. Bagheri, A proposal for energy dissipative braces with U-shaped steel strips, J. Constr. Steel Res. 154 (2019) 110–122. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
79. M. Ismail, F. Ikhouane and J. Rodellar, The hysteresis Bouc-Wen model, a survey, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 16 (2009) 161–188. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
80. R. S. Thyagarajan and W. D. Iwan, Performance characteristics of a widely used hysteretic model in structural dynamics, in Proc. Fourth U.S. National Conf. Earthquake Engineering (USA, 1990). Google Scholar
81. A. Zona and A. Dall’Asta, Elastoplastic model for steel buckling-restrained braces, J. Constr. Steel Res. 68(1) (2012) 118–125. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
82. J. Lin, Extraction of dynamic soil properties using extended Kalman filter, J. Geotech. Eng. 120(12) (1994) 2100–2117. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
83. C. Chang, S. Strano and M. Terzo, Modelling of hysteresis in vibration control systems by means of the Bouc-Wen model, Shock Vib. 2016 (2016) 1–14. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
84. Z. Li and G. Shu, Hysteresis characterization and identification of the normalized Bouc-Wen model, Struct. Eng. Mech. 70 (2019) 209–219. Web of Science, Google Scholar
85. A. S. Pall, C. Marsh and P. Fazio, Friction joints for seismic control of large panel structures, J. Prestressed Concrete Institute 25(6) (1980) 38–61. Google Scholar
86. L. Ragni, A. Zona and A. Dall’Asta, Analytical expressions for preliminary design of dissipative bracing systems in steel frames, J. Constr. Steel Res. 67(1) (2011) 102–113. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
87. A. Ghaffary and R. Karami Mohammadi, Framework for virtual hybrid simulation of TADAS frames using opensees and abaqus, J. Vib. Control 24(11) (2018) 2165–2179. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
88. L. M. Moreschi and M. P. Singh, Design of yielding metallic and friction dampers for optimal seismic performance, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 32 (2003) 1291–1311. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
89. A. Manchalwar and S. V. Bakre, Optimization of metallic damper location for seismic response control, J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 7 (2019) 261–275. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
90. L. F. F. Miguel, L. F. F. Miguel and R. H. Lopez, Simultaneous optimization of force and placement of friction dampers under seismic loading, Eng. Optimiz. 48 (2016) 582–602. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
91. M. N. Eldin, J. Kim and J. Kim, Optimum distribution of steel slit-friction hybrid dampers based on life cycle cost, Steel Compos. Struct. 27 (2018) 633–646. Web of Science, Google Scholar
92. J. W. Park, J. Yoon, G. Yoon and Y. M. Lim, Bi-axial seismic behaviour of a bridge structure with a shape optimized metallic damper, Mater. Sci. Eng. 431 (2018) 122008. Google Scholar
93. K. Inoue and S. Kuwahara, Optimum strength ratio of hysteretic damper, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 27(6) (1998) 577–588. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
94. A. Di Cesare, F. C. Ponzo, N. Lamarucciola, D. Nigro and S. Pampanin, Dissipative bracing system for post-tensioned timber framed buildings: Experimental testing of U-shape hysteretic dampers, Int. J. Earthq. Eng. 36(3) (2019) 38–54. Google Scholar
95. Y. Li, F. Geng, Y. Ding and L. Wang, Influence of mild steel damper design parameters on energy dissipation performance of low-damage self-centering precast concrete frame connections, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 144 (2021) 106696. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
96. M. Zabihi-Samani, Design of optimal slit steel damper under cyclic loading for special moment frame by cuckoo search, Int. J. Steel Struct. 19(4) (2019) 1260–1271. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
97. P. Katal Mohseni, A. Zahedi-Khameneh and O. Naeemifar, Study of the effect of geometric parameters of steel block slit dampers on energy absorption, Int. J. Steel Struct. 20(3) (2020) 1069–1079. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
98. A. Formisano, G. De Matteis and F. M. Mazzolani, Numerical and experimental behaviour of a full-scale RC structure upgraded with steel and aluminium shear panels, Comput. Struct. 88(23–24) (2010) 1348–1360. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
99. D. Feng, A. Li and T. Guo, Seismic control of a single-tower extradosed railway bridge using the E-Shaped steel damping bearing, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 136 (2020) 106249. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
100. B. Zhao, B. Lu, X. Zeng and Q. Gu, Experimental and numerical study of hysteretic performance of new brace type damper, J. Constr. Steel Res. 183 (2021) 106717. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
101. M. Fujimoto, A. Wada, E. Saeki, T. Takeuchi and A. Watanabe, Development of unbonded brace, Quarterly Column 115(1) (1990) 91–96. Google Scholar
102. H. Dong, X. Du, Q. Han, H. Hao, K. Bi and X. Wang, Performance of an innovative self-centering buckling restrained brace for mitigating seismic responses of bridge structures with double-column piers, Eng. Struct. 148 (2017) 47–62. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
103. F. Sadek, B. Mohraz and M. A. Riley, Linear procedures for structures with velocity-dependent dampers, J. Struct. Eng. 126(8) (2000) 887–895. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
104. D. P. Taylor, Smart buildings and viscous dampers-a design engineer’s perspective, Struct. Des. Tall Spec. 19(4) (2010) 369–372. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
105. D. I. Narkhede and R. Sinha, Behavior of nonlinear fluid viscous dampers for control of shock vibrations, J. Sound Vib. 333(1) (2014) 80–98. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
106. H. Yun, F. Tasbighoo, S. F. Masri, J. P. Caffrey, R. W. Wolfe, N. Makris and C. Black, Comparison of modeling approaches for full-scale nonlinear viscous dampers, J. Vib. Control 14(1–2) (2008) 51–76. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
107. L. J. Kong, Y. B. Chen, P. Li and Q. B. Jiang, The Anti-Seismic analysis of the lock-up device on the arch bridge, Adv. Mater. 368 (2012) 1047–1050. Google Scholar
108. L. J. Ma and J. M. Xu, Seismic analysis of urban elevated continuous bridges installed different damping devices, Appl. Mech. Mater. 638 (2014) 983–986. Crossref, Google Scholar
109. X. Lu, Y. Zhou and F. Yan, Shaking table test and numerical analysis of RC frames with viscous wall dampers, J. Struct. Eng. 134(1) (2008) 64–76. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
110. F. Sun, T. Wu and G. Mo, Resistant force model of viscous damping wall considering influence of loading frequency, Eng. Struct. 161 (2018) 96–107. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
111. N. Makris, S. A. Burton, D. Hill and M. Jordan, Analysis and design of ER damper for seismic protection of structures, J. Eng. Mech. 122(10) (1996) 1003–1011. Web of Science, Google Scholar
112. D. P. Taylor and M. C. Constantinou, Fluid dampers for applications of seismic energy dissipation and seismic isolation, página web www.Taylordevices.Com/dampers.Htm (1996). Google Scholar
113. C. Hou, Behavior explanation and a new model for nonlinear viscous fluid dampers with a simple annular orifice, Arch. Appl. Mech. 82(1) (2012) 1–12. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
114. X. He, W. Chen and B. Zhu, Theoretical analysis on the damping characteristics of a clearance type viscous damper, Adv. Sci. Lett. 15(1) (2012) 422–424. Crossref, Google Scholar
115. W. Min, K. Yang and C. Li, Mechanical characteristics of pore type viscous damper, J. Vib. Shock 40(9) (2021) 125–132. (in Chinese). Google Scholar
116. C. Guo, Y. Wu and Q. Fu, Adjustment of Viscous Damper Model and Simulation of Key Parameters, Hydra. Pneum. 12 (2017) 101–106 (in Chinese). Google Scholar
117. K. Sasaki, K. Kasai and Y. Ooki, Experiment method and grasp of dynamic properties of viscous fluid material: Study on strain, temperature and frequency sensitives dependence of shearing type viscous fluid damper: Part1, J. Struct. Constr. Eng. 76 (2011) 2183–2192 (in Japanese). Crossref, Google Scholar
118. K. Sasaki, K. Kasai and Y. Ooki, Experiment method and grasp of dynamic properties of viscous fluid material: Study on strain, temperature and frequency sensitives dependence of shearing type viscous fluid damper: Part2, J. Struct. Constr. Eng. 77 (2012) 791–798 (in Japanese). Crossref, Google Scholar
119. K. Sasaki and K. Kasai, Experiment method and grasp of dynamic properties of viscous fluid material: Study on strain, temperature and frequency sensitives dependence of shearing type viscous fluid damper: Part3, J. Struct. Constr. Eng. 78 (2013) 607–615 (in Japanese). Crossref, Google Scholar
120. F. Sun, J. Yang and T. Wu, Dynamic mechanical property experiment of viscous material for viscous damping wall, Front. Mater. 6 (2019) 112. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
121. A. Syrakos, Y. Dimakopoulos and J. Tsamopoulos, Theoretical study of the flow in a fluid damper containing high viscosity silicone oil: Effects of shear-thinning and viscoelasticity, Phys. Fluids 30(3) (2018) 30708. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
122. C. Y. Hou, D. S. Hsu, Y. F. Lee, H. Y. Chen and J. D. Lee, Shear-thinning effects in annular-orifice viscous fluid dampers, J. Chin. Inst. Eng. 30(2) (2007) 275–287. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
123. C. Hou, Fluid dynamics and behavior of nonlinear viscous fluid dampers, J. Struct. Eng. 134(1) (2008) 56–63. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
124. N. Makris and M. C. Constantinou, Fractional-derivative Maxwell model for viscous dampers, J. Struct. Eng. 117(9) (1991) 2708–2724. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
125. R. Greco and G. C. Marano, Identification of parameters of Maxwell and Kelvin–Voigt generalized models for fluid viscous dampers, J. Vib. Control 21(2) (2015) 260–274. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
126. S. Akcelyan, D. G. Lignos and T. Hikino, Adaptive numerical method algorithms for nonlinear viscous and bilinear oil damper models subjected to dynamic loading, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 113 (2018) 488–502. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
127. R. W. Wolfe, H. B. Yun, S. Masri, F. Tasbihgoo and G. Benzoni, Fidelity of reduced-order models for large-scale nonlinear orifice viscous dampers, Struct. Control Health Monit. 15(8) (2008) 1143–1163. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
128. F. Hejazi, M. D. Shoaei, A. Tousi and M. S. Jaafar, Analytical model for viscous wall dampers, Comput-Aided Civ. Inf. Eng. 31(5) (2016) 381–399. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
129. Y. Zhou, P. Chen, D. Zhang, S. Gong and W. Lu, A new analytical model for viscous wall dampers and its experimental validation, Eng. Struct. 163 (2018) 224–240. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
130. G. Pekcan, J. B. Mander and S. S. Chen, Design and Retrofit Methodology for Building Structures with Supplemental Energy Dissipating Systems (Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, New York, 1999). Google Scholar
131. J. Hwang, W. Lin and N. Wu, Comparison of distribution methods for viscous damping coefficients to buildings, Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 9 (2013) 28–41. Web of Science, Google Scholar
132. P. Chan, L. Leu and Q. T. Ming Ma, Optimizing viscous damper placement with element exchange method and energy-based distribution methods for building structures, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. (2022) 2250166, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455422501668. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
133. D. De Domenico and I. Hajirasouliha, Multi-level performance-based design optimization of steel frames with nonlinear viscous dampers, Bull. Earthq. Eng. 19 (2021) 5015–5049. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
134. Y. Zhou, M. S. Sebaq and Y. Xiao, Energy dissipation demand and distribution for multi-story buildings with fluid viscous dampers, Eng. Struct. 253 (2022) 113813. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
135. G. Terenzi, Dynamics of SDOF systems with nonlinear viscous damping, J. Eng. Mech. 125(8) (1999) 956–963. Web of Science, Google Scholar
136. M. Martinez-Rodrigo and M. L. Romero, An optimum retrofit strategy for moment resisting frames with nonlinear viscous dampers for seismic applications, Eng. Struct. 25(7) (2003) 913–925. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
137. E. Parcianello, C. Chisari and C. Amadio, Optimal design of nonlinear viscous dampers for frame structures, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 100 (2017) 257–260. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
138. H. Akehashi and I. Takewaki, Comparative investigation on optimal viscous damper placement for elastic-plastic MDOF structures: Transfer function amplitude or double impulse, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 130 (2020) 105987. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
139. I. Halperin, Y. Ribakov and G. Agranovich, Optimal viscous dampers gains for structures subjected to earthquakes, Struct. Control Health Monit. 23(3) (2016) 458–469. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
140. T. K. Lin, J. S. Hwang and K. H. Chen, Optimal distribution of damping coefficients for viscous dampers in buildings, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 17(4) (2017) 1750054. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
141. E. C. Kandemir-Mazanoglu and K. Mazanoglu, An optimization study for viscous dampers between adjacent buildings, Mech. Syst. Signal Pr. 89 (2017) 88–96. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
142. Y. Huang, Y. Xu and J. Li, Parameter design for viscous dampers to near-fault cable-stayed bridge based on equivalent damping ratio, in 2015 Int. Conf. Materials, Environmental and Biological Engineering (2015). Crossref, Google Scholar
143. J. F. Wu, L. Xiao and X. Z. Li, Parametric study on fluid viscous damper for a long span 3-pylon cable-stayed bridge based on seismic response control, International Efforts in Lifeline Earthquake Engineering (2014), pp. 409–416. Google Scholar
144. X. He, Y. Yang, X. Xiao and Y. Deng, Research on fluid viscous damper parameters of cable-stayed bridge in northwest China, Shock Vib. 2017 (2017) 4532325. Web of Science, Google Scholar
145. V. H. Cu, B. Han and T. N. Nguyen, Optimal parameters of viscous damper for hanged cables in arch bridges, KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 20(2) (2016) 847–854. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
146. S. Amir and H. Jiaxin, Optimum parameter of a viscous damper for seismic and wind vibration, Int. J. Geol. Environ. Eng. 8(2) (2014) 192–196. Google Scholar
147. X. Xu, Z. Li, W. Liu, D. Feng and X. Li, Investigation of the wind-resistant performance of seismic viscous dampers on a cable-stayed bridge, Eng. Struct. 145 (2017) 283–292. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
148. H. Dadkhah and M. Mohebbi, Performance assessment of an earthquake-based optimally designed fluid viscous damper under blast loading, Adv. Struct. Eng. 22(14) (2019) 3011–3025. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
149. D. P. Taylor, History, design, and applications of fluid dampers, in Structural Engineering Passive Structural Control Symposium (2002). Google Scholar
150. Structural applications of Taylor Fluid Viscous Dampers, Taylor Devices, Inc., 2016. http://www.taylordevices.com/pdf/2016/01Jan/201601JanStructuralApplicationChart-015.pdf. Google Scholar
151. A. Pecker, Design and construction of the Rion Antirion Bridge, in Proc. Conf. Geotechnical Engineering for Transportation Projects (USA, 2004). Crossref, Google Scholar
152. L. Zhou, X. Wang and A. Ye, Shake table test on transverse steel damper seismic system for long span cable-stayed bridges, Eng. Struct. 179 (2019) 106–119. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
153. D. Konstantinidis, N. Makris and J. M. Kelly, In-situ condition assessment of seismic fluid dampers: Experimental studies and challenges, Meccanica 50(2) (2015) 323–340. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
154. Y. Chen, Leaking analysis of fluid viscous damper for engineering structure, Steel Constr. 23(9) (2008) 55–59. (in Chinese). Google Scholar
155. H. K. Miyamoto, A. S. Gilani, A. Wada and C. Ariyaratana, Limit states and failure mechanisms of viscous dampers and the implications for large earthquakes, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 39(11) (2010) 1279–1297. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
156. J. Sun, P. Pan and H. Wang, Development and experimental validation of an assembled steel double-stage yield buckling restrained brace, J. Constr. Steel Res. 145 (2018) 330–340. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
157. W. Wang and Y. Liu, Concept and performance testing of an all-steel miniature dual stiffness damper, J. Constr. Steel Res. 183 (2021) 106772. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
158. W. Guo, S. Li, Z. Zhai, Z. Li, S. Tan and F. Ding, Seismic performance of a new S-shaped mild steel damper with varied yielding cross-sections, J. Build. Eng. 45 (2022) 103508. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
159. H. Hsu and H. Halim, Brace performance with steel curved dampers and amplified deformation mechanisms, Eng. Struct. 175 (2018) 628–644. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
160. P. Pan, H. Yan, T. Wang, P. Xu and Q. Xie, Development of steel dampers for bridges to allow large displacement through a vertical free mechanism, Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 13(3) (2014) 375–388. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
161. A. Benavent-Climent, D. Escolano-Margarit, J. Arcos-Espada and H. Ponce-Parra, New metallic damper with multiphase behavior for seismic protection of structures, Metals 11(2) (2021) 183. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
162. T. Roy and V. Matsagar, Effectiveness of passive response control devices in buildings under earthquake and wind during design life, Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 15 (2019) 252–268. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
163. X. Fan, Y. Du and W. Tan, Vibration suppression in frame-structural tower with fluid viscous dampers, in Pressure Vessels and Piping Conf., American (2019). Crossref, Google Scholar
164. M. D. Martínez-Rodrigo and A. Filiatrault, A case study on the application of passive control and seismic isolation techniques to cable-stayed bridges: A comparative investigation through non-linear dynamic analyses, Eng. Struct. 99 (2015) 232–252. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
165. J. Yi, J. Li and Z. Guan, Shake table studies on viscous dampers in seismic control of a single-tower cable-stayed bridge model under near-field ground motions, J. Earthq. Tsunami 12 (2018) 1850011. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
166. S. Wang and S. Mahin, Seismic upgrade of an existing tall building by different energy dissipation devices, in 2016 SEAOC Convention Proc., American (2016). Google Scholar
167. H. A. Sodano, J. Bae, D. J. Inman and W. K. Belvin, Concept and model of eddy current damper for vibration suppression of a beam, J. Sound Vib. 288(4–5) (2005) 1177–1196. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
168. L. Zuo, X. Chen and S. Nayfeh, Design and analysis of a new type of electromagnetic damper with increased energy density, J. Vib. Acoust. 133(4) (2011) 041006. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
169. Q. Wen, X. G. Hua, Z. Q. Chen, Y. Yang and H. W. Niu, Control of human-induced vibrations of a curved cable-stayed bridge: Design, implementation, and field validation, J. Bridge Eng. 21(7) (2016) 4016028. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
170. K. Pluk, T. A. Van Beek, J. W. Jansen and E. A. Lomonova, Modeling and measurements on a finite rectangular conducting plate in an eddy current damper, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 61(8) (2013) 4061–4072. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
171. Z. Wang, Z. Chen and J. Wang, Feasibility study of a large-scale tuned mass damper with eddy current damping mechanism, Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 11(3) (2012) 391–401. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
172. H. Y. Zhang, Z. Q. Chen, X. G. Hua, Z. W. Huang and H. W. Niu, Design and dynamic characterization of a large-scale eddy current damper with enhanced performance for vibration control, Mech. Syst. Signal Pr. 145 (2020) 106879. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
173. B. Ebrahimi, M. B. Khamesee and F. Golnaraghi, A novel eddy current damper: Theory and experiment, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 42(7) (2009) 75001. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
174. R. Palomera-Arias, J. J. Connor and J. A, Ochsendorf, Feasibility study of passive electromagnetic damping systems, J. Struct. Eng. 134(1) (2008) 164–170. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
175. B. Ebrahimi, M. B. Khamesee and F. Golnaraghi, Eddy current damper feasibility in automobile suspension: Modeling, simulation and testing, Smart Mater. Struct. 18(1) (2008) 15017. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
176. L. Wang, S. Nagarajaiah, W. Shi and Y. Zhou, Study on adaptive-passive eddy current pendulum tuned mass damper for wind-induced vibration control, Struct. Des. Tall Spec. 29(15) (2020) e1793. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
177. L. Wang, W. Shi, Y. Zhou and Q. Zhang, Semi-active eddy current pendulum tuned mass damper with variable frequency and damping, Smart Struct. Syst. 25(1) (2020) 65–80. Web of Science, Google Scholar
178. Y. Bougteb and T. Ray, Choice between series and parallel connections of hysteretic system and viscous damper for seismic protection of structures, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 47(1) (2018) 237–244. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
179. A. Pourzangbar, M. Vaezi, S. M. Mousavi and A. Saber, Effects of brace-viscous damper system on the dynamic response of steel frames, Int. J. Eng. 33(5) (2020) 720–731. Google Scholar
180. R. S. Kaleybar and P. Tehrani, Effects of using different arrangements and types of viscous dampers on seismic performance of intermediate steel moment frames in comparison with different passive dampers, Structures 33 (2021) 3382–3396. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
181. S. Hashizume and I. Takewaki, Hysteretic–viscous hybrid damper system for Long-Period Pulse-Type earthquake ground motions of large amplitude, Front. Built Environ. 6 (2020) 62. Crossref, Google Scholar
182. S. Ishida and I. Takewaki, Optimal seismic design of stiffness and gap of hysteretic-viscous hybrid damper system in nonlinear building frames for simultaneous reduction of interstory drift and acceleration, Front. Built Environ. 7 (2021) 22. Crossref, Google Scholar
183. P. Deastra, D. J. Wagg and N. D. Sims, Using a Tuned-Inerto-Viscous-Hysteretic-Damper (TIVhD) for vibration suppression in multi-storey building structures, Earth Environ. Sci. 708 (2021) 12012. Google Scholar
184. O. Ranaei and A. A. Aghakouchak, A new hybrid energy dissipation system with viscoelastic and flexural yielding strips dampers for multi-level vibration control, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 19(2) (2019) 584–597. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
185. J. Liu, Y. Chen and X. Ning, Speed lock E-shaped steel damping bearing and its application, Railw. Eng. 3 (2013) 49–52. (in Chinese). Google Scholar
186. S. Hu, D. Meng, R. Hu and M. Yang, A Combined Viscous-Steel Damping System (CVSDS) for longitudinal vibration mitigation of a long-span railway suspension bridge, J. Earthq. Eng. (2022), https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2022.2074915. Web of Science, Google Scholar