Research ArticleNo Access

Dynamic Behavior and Parameter Characteristics of Buried Pipeline in Airports

Department of Transportation Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, P. R. China

E-mail Address: hcwei@126.com

Search for more papers by this author

Weixiao Li

https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3538-2831

Department of Transportation Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, P. R. China

E-mail Address: 3048895154@qq.com

Search for more papers by this author

, and

Yu Sun

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4396-1544

Department of Transportation Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, P. R. China

E-mail Address: ysun@usst.edu.cn

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455424501220Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

Buried pipeline, as one of the crucial facilities of airport ground engineering, has been extensively utilized for the transportation of petroleum, natural gas, industrial wastewater, and more. However, there are significant gaps in the research on the dynamic response of buried pipelines in airports under the action of dynamic traffic loads, which severely hampers the design and engineering quality of oil transmission pipelines. This study builds a three-dimensional finite element model to simulate the action of vehicles on the pipe–soil structure with actual loads. Moreover, the current research establishes a dynamic analysis model of pipe–soil interaction to analyze the material damping and load parameters. Using the structural dynamic response equation and Rayleigh damping calculation theory, this study investigates the change law of pipe dynamic stress and influencing factors and presents the recommended values of the parameters related to the pipe–soil interaction. Results are as follows. A damping ratio of 0.05 can enhance the time lag of the dynamic response of the structure and weaken the response peak. For the Rayleigh damping parameters, the viscous damping coefficient $α$ has almost no effect on the dynamic response of the pipe–soil structure, so it can be disregarded in the calculation. With the increase of the axial weight of the traffic load above the pavement structure, the peak value of each dynamic response quantity of the pipe–soil structure and load magnitude. The suggested value of the dynamic load coefficient of the pipe–soil structure is 1.5. Lastly, the earth pressure and dynamic load coefficients are suggested to take values for different load and axle type cases.

Keywords:

Remember to check out the Most Cited Articles!
Remember to check out the structures

References

1. G. D. Manolis, G. Stefanou and A. A. Markou , Dynamic response of buried pipelines in randomly structured soil, Soil. Dyn. 128(2) (2020) 105873. Crossref, Google Scholar
2. B. K. Mishra and P. C. Upadhyay , Dynamic response of buried pipelines: An elasticity solution, J. Pressure Vessel. Technol. 112(3) (1990) 291–295. Crossref, Google Scholar
3. J. Du, S. Wu, Y. Zhang and S. Hou , Dynamic response study of buried pipe subjected to dynamic compaction, IOP Conf. Ser. 300(2) (2019) 022055. Crossref, Google Scholar
4. B.-C. Sun, X. Ling, W.-H. Zhou and S. Wang , Mechanical response of buried gas pipeline to excavation blasting in urban underground space, Blasting 39(3) (2022) 190–198. Google Scholar
5. A. Sajjad Abedi, N. Hataf and A. Ghahramani , Analytical solution of the dynamic response of buried pipelines under blast wave, Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. 88 (2016) 301–306. Crossref, Google Scholar
6. H. Zhang, L. Shao, C. Yu, S. Lu and G. Du , Experimental and numerical simulation study of impact loading on buried pipeline, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42(3) (2022) 243–252. Google Scholar
7. B. Li, H. Fang, K. Yang, X. Zhang, X. Du, N. Wang and X. Guo , Impact of erosion voids and internal corrosion on concrete pipes under traffic loads, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 130(130) (2022) 104761. Crossref, Google Scholar
8. Y. Linqing, H. Zejun, G. Chengchao, C. Dingfeng, N. Pengpeng and W. Fuming , An innovative solution for the dynamic response of buried pipelines in layered transversely isotropic soil under pavement structures, Comput. Geotech. 143 (2022) 104602. Crossref, Google Scholar
9. J. Ho Jeong, K. Yeol Lee and H. Sub Kang , Effect on coefficient of subgrade reaction on dynamic responses of buried pipelines, J. Power. Syst. Eng. 21(2) (2017) 83–89. Crossref, Google Scholar
10. W. Haoqi, Z. Zhang and C. Jun , Statistical analysis and its validation of the change in structural dynamic properties under crowd bouncing excitation, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 22(14) (2022) 2250160. Link, Google Scholar
11. X. X. Zhu, S. F. Xue, X. H. Tong and C. Q. Liu , Dynamic responses of buried pipelines under impact loading caused by landslide, Appl. Mech. Mater. 1975 (2012) 204–208. Google Scholar
12. B. Gonzalo, L. Tam and C. Nawawi , Experimental study of the effect of proximity between adjacent buildings on their dynamic response, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 21(4) (2021) 2150048. Link, Google Scholar
13. X. Xie, R. Li, Y. Cui, X. Li and S. Luo , Dynamic response of water-hammer pressure wave and arch bridge composite structure of inverted siphon pipeline based on two-way fluid-structure coupling, Chin. J. Appl. Mech. (2022) 1–10, https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/61.1112.O3.20220725.1131.002.html. Google Scholar
14. Q. Li, H. Cheng, Y. Hou, M. Luo and Q. Zhang , Study on dynamic response behavior of buried pipeline with scratch defect subjected to impact loading, Welded Pipe Tube. 45(6) (2022) 1–7. Google Scholar
15. J. Zhou, J. Cui, R. Dong, Y. Li and Y. Shan , Study on shell-spring model for longitudinal dynamic response analysis of operating buried pipeline, Soil. Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 42(5) (2022) 196–203. Google Scholar
16. B. Li, H. Fang, K. Zhai, K. Yang, X. Zhang and Y. Wang , Mechanical behavior of concrete pipes with erosion voids and the effectiveness evaluation of the polyurethane grouting, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 129 (2022) 104672. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
17. B. Li, W. Yu, Y. Xie, H. Fang, X. Du, N. Wang, K. Zhai, D. Wang, X. Chen, M. Du, M. Sun and X. Zhao , Trenchless rehabilitation of sewage pipelines from the perspective of the whole technology chain: A state-of-the-art review, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 134 (2023) 105022. Crossref, Google Scholar
18. H. Xu, M. H. Wang, Z. L. Wang, D. S. Yang, Y. H. Liu and Y. B. Yang , Generation of surface roughness profiles for inclusion in vehicle-bridge interaction analysis and test application, Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 23(8) (2023) 2350094. Link, Google Scholar
19. H. Jiang, Z. Liu, Z. Lu and G. Liu , Solving fractional van der Pol system based on Adams discretization and Newmark- $β$ method, Acta Scient. Nat. Univ. Sunyat. 61(5) (2022) 126–132. Google Scholar
20. J. Shan and X. Huang , Study on dynamic response model of pavement, J. Vib. Shock. 9 (2007) 89–93+172–173. Google Scholar
21. D. Xuejun , Study on dynamics of vehicle-ground pavement structure system, J. Southeast Univ. (Nat. Sci. Edn.) 3 (2002) 474–479. Google Scholar
22. Z. Zhengfeng , Study on the Load-Bearing Capacity of Airport Cement Concrete Pavement Joints (Tongji University, Shanghai, 2008). Google Scholar
23. X. Lin, J. Ling, S. Guan and C. Li , Analysis on stress level of subgrade under cement concrete pavement, J. Tongji Univ. Nat. Sci. 38(4) (2010) 545–551. Google Scholar
24. M. Liu, X. Huang and X. Tao , FEM analysis of dynamic response of pavement adjacent to abutment under moving load, J. Highw. Transp. Res. Dev. 23(5) (2006) 1–6. Google Scholar
25. X. Jiang and H. Yuan , Damping mechanisms of material under dynamic loads, Highway 3 (2003) 100–103. Google Scholar
26. X. Qiu, J. Ling, H. Fang and X. Jiang , Mechanism analysis of damping effect on dynamic deflection of asphalt pavement, Mech. Eng. 30(6) (2008) 51–55. Google Scholar