Research PaperNo Access

Binarization of Stone Inscription Images by Modified Bi-level Entropy Thresholding

Underwater Acoustic Research Laboratory, Department of ECE, Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering, Chennai, India

E-mail Address: sukanthi1805ae@ece.ssn.edu.in

Search for more papers by this author

S. Sakthivel Murugan

Underwater Acoustic Research Laboratory, Department of ECE, Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering, Chennai, India

E-mail Address: sakthivels@ssn.edu.in

Search for more papers by this author

, and

S. Hanis

Underwater Acoustic Research Laboratory, Department of ECE, Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering, Chennai, India

E-mail Address: haniss@ssn.edu.in

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219477521500541Cited by:9 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

India is rich in its heritage and culture. It has many historical monuments and temples where the walls are made of inscribed stones and rocks. The stone inscriptions play a vital role in portraying about the ancient incidents. Hence, the digitization of these stone inscriptions is necessary and contributes much for the epigraphers. Recently, the digitizing of these inscriptions began with the binarization process of stone inscriptions. This process mainly depends on the thresholding technique. In this paper, the binarization of terrestrial and underwater stone inscription images is preceded by a contrast enhancement and succeeded by edge-based filtering that minimizes noise and fine points the edges. A new method called modified bi-level thresholding (MBET) algorithm is proposed and compared with various existing thresholding algorithms namely Otsu method, Niblack method, Sauvola method, Bernsen method and Fuzzy C means method. The obtained results are evaluated with the performance metrics such as peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and standard deviation (SD). It is observed that the proposed method has an improvement of 49% and 39%, respectively, on an average by the metrics considered.

Communicated by Stefania Residori

Keywords:

References

1. W. Niblack , Introduction to Digital Image Processing (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1986), pp. 115–116. Google Scholar
2. J. Sauvola and M. Pietikinen , Adaptive document image binarization, Pattern Recognit. 33(2) (2000) 225–236. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
3. C. Tomasi and R. Manduchi , Bilateral filtering for gray and color images, in Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Xplore, Bombay, India, 1998), pp. 839–846. Crossref, Google Scholar
4. T. R. Singh et al., A new local adaptive thresholding technique in binarization, arXiv:1201.5227. Google Scholar
5. B. Gatos, I. Pratikakis and S. J. Perantonis , Adaptive degraded document image binarization, Pattern Recognit. 39(3) (2006) 317–332. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
6. C. O. Ancuti, C. Ancuti, C. De Vleeschouwer and R. Garcia , Locally adaptive color correction for underwater image dehazing and matching, in IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops 2017 (Honolulu, HI, USA, July 2017), pp. 997–1005. Google Scholar
7. J. Y. Chiang and Y. C. Chen , Underwater image enhancement by wavelength compensation and dehazing, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 21(4) (2012) 1756–1769. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
8. Y. Y. Schechner and N. Karpel , Recovery of underwater visibility and structure by polarization analysis, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 30(3) (2006) 570–587. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. J. Liang, L. Yong Ren, H. Juan Ju, E. Shi Qu and Y. Li Wang , Visibility enhancement of hazy images based on a universal polarimetric imaging method, J. Appl. Phys. 116(17) (2014) 820–827. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. J. Kopf, B. Neubert, B. Chen, M. Cohen, D. Cohenor, O. Deussen, M. Uyttendaele and D. Lischinski , Deep photo: Model based photograph enhancement and viewing, ACM Trans. Graph. 27(5) (2008) 1–10. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. K. Iqbal et al., Enhancing the low quality images using unsupervised colour correction method, IEEE Int. Conf. Systems Man and Cybernetics, 2010, pp. 1703–1709. Crossref, Google Scholar
12. R. T. Tan , Visibility in bad weather from a single image, IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR (Anchorage, Alaska, USA, 2008), pp. 1–8. Crossref, Google Scholar
13. R. Fattal , Single image dehazing, ACM Trans. Graph. (TOG) 27(3) (2008) 1–9. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
14. K. He, J. Sun and X. Tang , Single image haze removal using dark channel prior, IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR, Miami, 2009, pp. 1956–1963. Google Scholar
15. L. Kratz and K. Nishino , Factorizing scene albedo and depth from a single foggy image, IEEE Int. Conf. Computer Vision (Philadelphia, 2009), pp. 1701–1708. Crossref, Google Scholar
16. A. Soumya and G. H. Kumar , Preprocessing of camera captured inscriptions and segmentation of handwritten Kannada text, Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng. 3(5) (2014) 6794–6803. Google Scholar
17. N. Otsu , A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 9(1) (1979) 62–66. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
18. J. Bernsen, Dynamic thresholding of grey level images, Proc. Eighth Int. Conf. Pattern Recognition, pp. 1251. Int. Conf. Computer Vision (Berlin, 1986), pp. 839–846. Google Scholar
19. Y. Alginahi , Preprocessing techniques in character recognition, in Character Recognition (InTech, 2010), pp. 1–22. Crossref, Google Scholar
20. N. Chaki, S. H. Shaikh and K. Saeed , A comprehensive survey on image binarization techniques, in Exploring Image Binarization Techniques, ed. N. Chaki (Springer, New Delhi, 2014), pp. 5–15. Crossref, Google Scholar
21. S. Das, S. Mandal and A. K. Das , Binarization of stone inscripted documents, 2015 IEEE Int. Conf. Computer Graphics, Vision and Information Security (CGVIS), 2015, IEEE, pp. 11–16. Crossref, Google Scholar
22. J. C. Bezdec , Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms (Plenum Press, New York, 1981). Crossref, Google Scholar
23. B. Su, S. Lu and C. L. Tan , Robust document image binarization technique for degraded document images, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 22(4) (2013) 1408–1417. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
24. M. A. R. Raj and S. Abirami , A survey on Tamil handwritten character recognition, Computer Science Conference Proceedings (CSCP) 5 (2012) 115–127. Google Scholar
25. S. Rajakumar and V. S. Bharathi , Century identification and recognition of ancient Tamil character recognition, Int. J. Comput. Appl. 26(4) (2011) 32–35. Google Scholar
26. S. Rajakumar and V. S. Bharathi , Eighth century Tamil consonants recognition from stone inscriptions, Int. Conf. Recent Trends in Information Technology, Chennai, India, 2012. Crossref, Google Scholar
27. G. Bhuvaneswari and V. Subbiah Bharathi , An efficient positional algorithm for recognition of ancient stone inscription characters, 2015 Seventh Int. Conf. Advanced Computing (ICoAC) (IEEE, 2015), pp. 1–5. Crossref, Google Scholar
28. H. S. Mohana, R. Pradeepa, P. N. Kammar and B. K. Rajithkumar , Identification and recognition of ancient stone in-scripted Hoysala characters using support vector machine (SVM) model, Int. J. Innov. Res. Technol. 1(12) (2015). Google Scholar
29. R. A. Jeniffer and G. Bhuvaneswari , Image glazing for thinning of ancient Tamil characters, Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 5(6) (2014) 12. Google Scholar
30. L. Jianzhuang, L. Wenqing and T. Yupeng , Automatic thresholding of gray-level pictures using two-dimension Otsu method, 1991 Int. Conf. Circuits and Systems (China, IEEE, 1991), pp. 325–327. Crossref, Google Scholar
31. K. D. Durga and P. U. Maheswari , Insight on character recognition for calligraphy digitization, Int. Conf. Technological Innovations in ICT for Agriculture and Rural Development (TIAR) (IEEE, 2017), pp. 78–83. Google Scholar
32. B. Bataineh, S. N. H. S. Abdullah and K. Omar , An adaptive local binarization method for document images based on a novel thresholding method and dynamic windows, Pattern Recognit. Lett. 32(14) (2011) 1805–1813. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
33. R. Hedjam, R. F. Moghaddam and M. Cheriet , A spatially adaptive statistical method for the binarization of historical manuscripts and degraded document images, Pattern Recognit. 44(9) (2011) 2184–2196. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
34. Y. Liu and S. Srihari , Document image binarization based on texture features, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 19(5) (1997) 540–544. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
35. O. H. Hwa, L. T. Kil and C. I. Sung , An improved binarization algorithm based on a water flow model for document image with inhomogeneous backgrounds, Pattern Recognit. 38 (2005) 2612–2625. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
36. S. Indu, A. Tomar, A. Raj and S. Chaudhury , Enhancement and retrieval of historic inscription images, 3rd ACCV Workshop on e-Heritage, 3 November 2014, Singapore, pp. 529–541. Google Scholar
37. I. Sreedevi, R. Pandey, N. Jayanthi, G. Bhola and S. Chaudhury , NGFICA based digitization of historic inscription images, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, ISRN Signal Process. (2013) 735857. Google Scholar
38. A. Shaus, E. Turkel and E. Piasetzky , Binarization of first temple period inscriptions: Performance of existing algorithms and a new registration based scheme, Proc. Int. Conf. Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, Bari, Italy, 2012, pp. 645–650. Crossref, Google Scholar
39. R. Gonzalez, R. Woods and S. Eddins , Digital Image Processing using MATLAB (Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2004). Google Scholar