Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/CommonHTML/jax.js
World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at customercare@wspc.com for any enquiries.

*-Symmetric rings

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219498826500982Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)

    Let R be a ∗-ring. Then R is called a ∗-symmetric ring if for any a,b,cR, abc=0 implies acb=0. Obviously, ∗-symmetric ring is certainly symmetric ring, while ∗-ring and symmetric ring does not equal ∗-symmetric ring. Even though reduced rings are symmetric, reduced rings need not be ∗-symmetric ring. In this paper, we further add some conditions for symmetric ring to be ∗-symmetric and reduced. As an application, we discover if R be a ∗-symmetric ring, then R#=REP=R+=Rreg. Also, we expand the definition of ∗-symmetric ring to different combinations of a,b,c. The properties of ∗-symmetric ring play a role in generalized inverses of elements in rings.

    Communicated by André Leroy

    AMSC: 16A30, 16A50, 16E50, 16D30, 16B99, 16W10