Research ArticlesNo Access

EFFECTS OF SUBSTRATE DEFORMABILITY ON CELL BEHAVIORS: ELASTIC MODULUS VERSUS THICKNESS

ZAHRA GOLI-MALEKABADI

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6141-574X

Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, 424, Hafez Avenue, Tehran, Iran

E-mail Address: zahrag@mit.edu

Search for more papers by this author

MOHAMMAD TAFAZZOLI-SHADPOUR

Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, 424, Hafez Avenue, Tehran, Iran

E-mail Address: tafazoli@aut.ac.ir

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

, and

EHSAN SEYEDJAFARI

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4999-286X

Department of Biotechnology, University of Tehran, 13, Shafei alley, vesal Avenue, Tehran, Iran

E-mail Address: seyedjafari@ut.ac.ir

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219519417500889Cited by:1 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

The deformability of the substrate stimulating cell mechanotransduction depends not only on elastic modulus but also on the thickness. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) which is widely used in microfluidic chips and platforms can be fabricated in a wide range of elastic modulus and thickness. In this study, we cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) on four groups of PDMS substrates of varying thickness and elastic modulus to examine effects of these parameters on morphology, viability and proliferation of cells. Both elastic modulus and thickness affected cell behavior. In general, the thickness of substrates had relatively higher impact on endothelial morphology than elastic modulus. Elongation of HUVECs on thick substrates was more intense compared to those on thin substrates. Both lowering thickness and reducing elastic modulus of PDMS decreased the viability of HUVECs, although thickness was more influential. Decrease in substrate thickness reduced cell proliferation regardless of substrate elastic modulus. In conclusion, our results suggest that endothelial behavior depends on substrate deformability, but cells react differently to the elastic modulus and thickness of PDMS by morphology, viability and growth. Results can improve the comprehension of cell mechanotransduction.

Keywords:

References

1. Lo CM, Wang HB, Dembo M, Wang Y-l , Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate, Biophys J 79 :144–152, 2000. Web of Science, Google Scholar
2. Ball M, Grant DM, Lo WJ, Scotchford CA , The effect of different surface morphology and roughness on osteoblast-like cells, J Biomed Mater Res Part A 86 :637–647, 2008. Web of Science, Google Scholar
3. Nikkhah M, Edalat F, Manoucheri S, Khademhosseini A , Engineering microscale topographies to control the cell–substrate interface, Biomaterials 33 :5230–5246, 2002. Web of Science, Google Scholar
4. Tzvetkova-Chevolleau T, Stéphanou A, Fuard D, Ohayon J, Schiavone P, Tracqui P , The motility of normal and cancer cells in response to the combined influence of the substrate rigidity and anisotropic microstructure, Biomaterials 29 :1541–1551, 2008. Web of Science, Google Scholar
5. Brown XQ, Ookawa K, Wong JY , Evaluation of polydimethylsiloxane scaffolds with physiologically-relevant elastic moduli: Interplay of substrate mechanics and surface chemistry effects on vascular smooth muscle cell response, Biomaterials 26 :3123–3129, 2005. Web of Science, Google Scholar
6. Sridharan I, Kim T, Wang R , Adapting collagen/CNT matrix in directing hESC differentiation, Biochem Biophys Res Commun 381 :508–512, 2009. Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang Y-l , Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate, Science 310 :1139–1143, 2005. Web of Science, Google Scholar
8. Buxboim A, Rajagopal K, Andre’EX B, Discher DE , How deeply cells feel: Methods for thin gels, J Phys Condens Matter 22 :194116, 2010. Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. Franck C, Maskarinec SA, Tirrell DA, Ravichandran G , Three-dimensional traction force microscopy: A new tool for quantifying cell-matrix interactions, PloS One 6 :e17833, 2011. Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. Rudnicki MS, Cirka HA, Aghvami M, Sander EA, Wen Q, Billiar KL , Nonlinear strain stiffening is not sufficient to explain how far cells can feel on fibrous protein gels, Biophys J 105 :11–20, 2013. Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. Georges PC, Hui J-J, Gombos Z et al., Increased stiffness of the rat liver precedes matrix deposition: Implications for fibrosis, Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 293 :G1147–G1154, 2007. Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. Van Eijden T, Van Ruijven L, Giesen E , Bone tissue stiffness in the mandibular condyle is dependent on the direction and density of the cancellous structure, Calcif Tissue Int 75 :502–508, 2004. Web of Science, Google Scholar
13. Sazonova OV, Lee KL, Isenberg BC, Rich CB, Nugent MA, Wong JY , Cell-cell interactions mediate the response of vascular smooth muscle cells to substrate stiffness, Biophys J 101 :622–30, 2011. Web of Science, Google Scholar
14. Park JY, Yoo SJ, Lee E-J, Lee DH, Kim JY, Lee S-H , Increased poly (dimethylsiloxane) stiffness improves viability and morphology of mouse fibroblast cells, BioChip J 4 :230–236, 2010. Web of Science, Google Scholar
15. Eisenberg JL, Safi A, Wei X et al., Substrate stiffness regulates extracellular matrix deposition by alveolar epithelial cells, Res Rep Biol 2011 :1, 2011. Google Scholar
16. Prauzner-Bechcicki S, Raczkowska J, Madej E et al., PDMS substrate stiffness affects the morphology and growth profiles of cancerous prostate and melanoma cells, J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 41 :13–22, 2015. Web of Science, Google Scholar
17. Trappmann B, Gautrot JE, Connelly JT et al., Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate, Nature Mater 11 :642–649, 2012. Web of Science, Google Scholar
18. McEniery CM, Hall IR, Qasem A, Wilkinson IB, Cockcroft JR , Normal vascular aging: Differential effects on wave reflection and aortic pulse wave velocity: The Anglo-Cardiff Collaborative Trial (ACCT), J Am Coll Cardiol 46 :1753–1760, 2005. Web of Science, Google Scholar
19. Fernandes VRS, Polak JF, Cheng S et al., Arterial stiffness is associated with regional ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis, Arterioscler. Thromb Vasc Biol 28 :194–201, 2008. Web of Science, Google Scholar
20. Laurent S, Boutouyrie P , Recent advances in arterial stiffness and wave reflection in human hypertension, Hypertension 49 :1202–1206, 2007. Web of Science, Google Scholar
21. Lee K, Forudi F, Saidel GM, Penn MS , Alterations in internal elastic lamina permeability as a function of age and anatomical site precede lesion development in apolipoprotein E–null mice, Circ Res 97 :450–456, 2005. Web of Science, Google Scholar
22. Fioretta ES, Fledderus JO, Baaijens FP, Bouten CV , Influence of substrate stiffness on circulating progenitor cell fate, J Biomech 45 :736–744, 2012. Web of Science, Google Scholar
23. Mason BN, Starchenko A, Williams RM, Bonassar LJ, Reinhart-King CA , Tuning three-dimensional collagen matrix stiffness independently of collagen concentration modulates endothelial cell behavior, Acta Biomater 9 :4635–4644, 2013. Web of Science, Google Scholar
24. Canver AC, Ngo O, Urbano RL, Clyne AM , Endothelial directed collective migration depends on substrate stiffness via localized myosin contractility and cell-matrix interactions, J Biomech 49 :1369–1380, 2016. Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. Lee JN, Jiang X, Ryan D, Whitesides GM , Compatibility of mammalian cells on surfaces of poly (dimethylsiloxane), Langmuir 20 :11684–11691, 2004. Web of Science, Google Scholar
26. Smith Q, Gerecht S , Going with the flow: Microfluidic platforms in vascular tissue engineering, Curr Opin Chem Eng 3 :42–50, 2014. Web of Science, Google Scholar
27. Goli-Malekabadi Z, Tafazzoli-Shadpour M, Rabbani M, Janmaleki M , Effect of uniaxial stretch on morphology and cytoskeleton of human mesenchymal stem cells: Static versus dynamic loading, Biomed Tech 56 :259–265, 2011. Web of Science, Google Scholar
28. Mullen CA, Vaughan TJ, Billiar KL, McNamara LM , The effect of substrate stiffness, thickness, and cross-linking density on osteogenic cell behavior, Biophys J 108 :1604–1612, 2015. Web of Science, Google Scholar
29. Li J, Han D, Zhao Y-P , Kinetic behaviour of the cells touching substrate: The interfacial stiffness guides cell spreading, Sci Rep 4 :3910, 2014. Web of Science, Google Scholar
30. Previtera ML, Langhammer CG, Firestein BL , Effects of substrate stiffness and cell density on primary hippocampal cultures, J Biosci Bioeng 110 :459–470, 2010. Web of Science, Google Scholar
31. Bartalena G, Loosli Y, Zambelli T, Snedeker J , Biomaterial surface modifications can dominate cell–substrate mechanics: The impact of PDMS plasma treatment on a quantitative assay of cell stiffness, Soft Matter 8 :673–681, 2012. Web of Science, Google Scholar