No Access

DEEP HOLOENTROPY-CORRELATIVE BLOOD CELL SEGMENTATION APPROACH WITH ESCO-BASED DCNN FOR BREAST CANCER CLASSIFICATION

Department of Computer Engineering, Manjara Charitable Trust's, Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Technology, Andheri (West), Mumbai 400 053, India

E-mail Address: jyotiumesh38@gmail.com

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

and

SUDHIR DHAGE

Department of Computer Engineering, Sardar Patel Institute of Technology, Mumbai University, Andheri (West), Mumbai 400 058, India

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219519423500719Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among women. Early identification of breast cancer allows patients to receive appropriate therapy, increasing their chances of survival. However, the early and precise detection of breast cancer is more challenging for researchers. Besides, histopathological image is the most effective tool for precise and early detection of breast cancer. Although it has restricted efficiency, breast cancer detection is the main challenge in medical image analysis. This study develops an Enhanced Cat Swarm Optimization-based Deep Convolutional Neural Network (ECSO-based DCNN) for the classification of breast cancer. Pre-processing is also more crucial in image processing since it improves image quality by removing noise from an input image. The segmentation process is used through a designed deep holoentropy-correlative segmentation method, where significant blood cells are extracted. The breast cancer detection and classification are performed using DCNN, which is trained by devised ECSO algorithm. The execution of the introduced deep holoentropy-correlative blood cell segmentation model with optimized DCNN for breast cancer categorization is performed using BreakHis and Breast Cancer Histopathological Annotation and Diagnosis (BreCaHAD) datasets. The proposed ECSO-based DCNN model obtained better performance with accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 96.26%, 97.6%, and 93.57%.

Keywords:

References

1. Akay MF , Support vector machines combined with feature selection for breast cancer diagnosis, Expert Syst Appl 36(2) :3240–3247, 2009. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
2. Tataroğlu GA, Genç A, Kabakçı KA, Çapar A, Töreyin BU, Ekenel HK, Türkmen İ, Çakır A , A deep learning based approach for classification of CerbB2 tumor cells in breast cancer, 2017 25th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conf (SIU), IEEE, pp. 1–4, 2017. Crossref, Google Scholar
3. World Health Organization, World Health Statistics, 2018. Google Scholar
4. Guo Y, Shang X, Li Z , Identification of cancer subtypes by integrating multiple types of transcriptomics data with deep learning in breast cancer, Neurocomputing 324 :20–30, 2019. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
5. Alteri R, Barnes C, Burke A, Gansler T, Gapstur S, Gaudet M, Kramer J, Newman LA, Niemeyer D, Richards C, Runowicz C, Breast cancer facts & figures 2013–2014, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, 2013. Google Scholar
6. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A , Global cancer statistics, 2012, CA, Cancer J Clin 65(2) :87–108, 2015. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. Danaei G, Vander Hoorn S, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, Ezzati M , Comparative Risk Assessment Collaborating Group, Causes of cancer in the world: Comparative risk assessment of nine behavioural and environmental risk factors, Lancet 366(9499) :1784–1793, 2005. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
8. Toğaçar M, Özkurt KB, Ergen B, Cömert Z , BreastNet: A novel convolutional neural network model through histopathological images for the diagnosis of breast cancer, Phys A 545 :123592, 2020. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, Ahnen DJ, Meester RGS, Barzi A, Jemal A , Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017, CA, Cancer J Clin 67(3) :177–193, 2017. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. Wang Z, Li M, Wang H, Jiang H, Yao Y, Zhang H, Xin J , Breast cancer detection using extreme learning machine based on feature fusion with CNN deep features, IEEE Access 7 :105146–105158, 2019. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. Aresta G, Araújo T, Kwok S, Chennamsetty SS, Safwan M, Alex V, Marami B, Prastawa M, Chan M, Donovan M, Fernandez G , BACH: Grand challenge on breast cancer histology images, Med Image Anal 56 :122–139, 2019. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. Suri JS, Rangayyan RM , Recent Advances in Breast Imaging, Mammography, and Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Breast Cancer, SPIE Press, Bellingham, 2006. Crossref, Google Scholar
13. Yang Z, Ran L, Zhang S, Xia Y, Zhang Y , EMS-Net: Ensemble of multiscale convolutional neural networks for classification of breast cancer histology images, Neurocomputing 366 :46–53, 2019. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
14. Litjens G, Kooi T, Bejnordi BE, Setio AA, Ciompi F, Ghafoorian M, Van Der Laak JA, Van Ginneken B, Sánchez CI , A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis, Med Image Anal 42 :60–88, 2017. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
15. Shen D, Wu G, Suk HI , Deep learning in medical image analysis, Annu Rev Biomed Eng 19 :221–248, 2017. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
16. Yan R, Ren F, Wang Z, Wang L, Zhang T, Liu Y, Rao X, Zheng C, Zhang F , Breast cancer histopathological image classification using a hybrid deep neural network, Methods 173 :52–60, 2020. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
17. Kumar SV, Nagaraju C , T2FCS filter: Type 2 fuzzy and cuckoo search-based filter design for image restoration, J Vis Commun Image Represent 58 :619–641, 2019. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
18. Renjit, A , DeepJoint segmentation for the classification of severity-levels of glioma tumour using multimodal MRI images, IET Image Process 14(11) :2541–2552, 2020. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
19. Tu F, Yin S, Ouyang P, Tang S, Liu L, Wei S , Deep convolutional neural network architecture with reconfigurable computation patterns, IEEE Trans Very Large Scale Integr (VLSI) Syst 25(8) :2220–2233, 2017. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
20. Chu SC, Tsai PW, Pan JS , Cat swarm optimization, Pacific Rim Int Conf Artificial Intelligence, Springer, Berlin, pp. 854–858, 2006. Crossref, Google Scholar
21. Zheng J, Lin D, Gao Z, Wang S, He M, Fan J , Deep learning assisted efficient AdaBoost algorithm for breast cancer detection and early diagnosis, IEEE Access 8 :96946–96954, 2020. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
22. Zhang YD, Satapathy SC, Guttery DS, Górriz JM, Wang SH , Improved breast cancer classification through combining graph convolutional network and convolutional neural network, Inf Process Manage 58(2) :102439, 2021. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
23. Saber A, Sakr M, Abo-Seida OM, Keshk A, Chen H , A novel deep-learning model for automatic detection and classification of breast cancer using the transfer-learning technique, IEEE Access 9 :71194–71209, 2021. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
24. Wang Y, Lei B, Elazab A, Tan EL, Wang W, Huang F, Gong X, Wang T , Breast cancer image classification via multi-network features and dual-network orthogonal low-rank learning, IEEE Access 8 :27779–27792, 2020. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. Li Y, Wu J, Wu Q , Classification of breast cancer histology images using multi-size and discriminative patches based on deep learning, IEEE Access 7 :21400–21408, 2019. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
26. Ibrahim A, Mohammed S, Ali HA, Hussein SE , Breast cancer segmentation from thermal images based on chaotic salp swarm algorithm, IEEE Access 8 :122121–122134, 2020. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
27. BreakHis dataset, https://www.kaggle.com/ambarish/breakhis, 2022. Google Scholar
28. Breast Cancer Histopathological Annotation and Diagnosis dataset, https://figshare.com/articles/BreCaHAD_A_Dataset_for_Breast_Cancer_Histopathological_Annotation_and_ Diagnosis/7379186, 2022. Google Scholar
29. Patil RS, Biradar N , Improved region growing segmentation for breast cancer detection: progression of optimized fuzzy classifier, Int J Intell Comput Cybern 13 :181–205, 2020. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
30. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T , U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, Proc Int Conf Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer, Cham, pp. 234–241, 2015. Crossref, Google Scholar
31. Praveena K, Venkatesh US, Sahoo NK, Ramanan SV, Bee MKM, Darwante NK , Brain tumor detection using ANFIS classifier and segmentation, Int J Health Sci 6 :11817–11828, 2022. Google Scholar
32. Fusini F, Zanchini F , Mini-open surgical treatment of an ex professional volleyball player with unresponsive Hoffa’s disease, Minerva Ortop Traumatol 67(4) :192–194, 2016. Google Scholar
33. Salim S, Sarath R , An improved invasive weed optimization enabled Shepard convolutional neural network for classification of breast cancer, Int J Imaging Syst Technol 32 :1521–1534, 2022. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
34. Kadry S, Rajinikanth V, Taniar D, Damaševičius R, Valencia XPB , Automated segmentation of leukocyte from hematological images — A study using various CNN schemes, J Supercomput 78 :6974–6994, 2022. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
35. Alzubi A, Eladli A , Mobile payment adoption-A systematic review, J Posit Psychol Wellbeing 5(3) :565–577, 2021. Google Scholar
36. Ramkumar MP, Mano Paul PD, Maram B, Ananth JP , Deep maxout network for lung cancer detection using optimization algorithm in smart Internet of Things, Concurrency Comput Pract Exp 34(25) :e7264, 2022. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
37. Balakrishnan S, Ananth JP, Ramanathan L, Sachinkanithkar R, Rajkumar S , A high security framework through human brain using algo mixture model deep learning algorithm, Stud Big Data 91 :45–59, 2022. Crossref, Google Scholar
38. Raghu AFA, Ananth JP , Object detection and localization using sparse-FCM and optimization-driven deep convolutional neural network, Comput J 65(5) :1225–1241, 2022. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
39. Rupapara V, Narra M, Gunda NK, Gandhi S, Thipparthy KR , Maintaining social distancing in pandemic using smartphones with acoustic waves, IEEE Trans Comput Soc Syst 9(2) :605–611, 2022. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
40. Suchanek M, Pawłowska J , Effects of transport behaviour on public health: A study on the students in the tricity area, New Research Trends in Transport Sustainability and Innovation: TranSopot 2017 Conf, Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, Springer, Cham, pp. 28–36, 2018. Crossref, Google Scholar
41. Gualdi A, Cambiaso-Daniel J, Gatti J, Wurzer P, Sljivich M, Scherer SS, Pietramaggiori G, Bertossi D, Botti C, Botti G , Double triangular cartilage excision otoplasty, Plast Reconst Surg 141(3) :348–356, 2018. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
42. Botti G, Botti C, Cella A, Gualdi A , Correction of the naso-jugal groove, Orbit 26(3) :193–202, 2007. Crossref, Google Scholar