No Access

A Method for Ranking Products Through Online Reviews Based on Sentiment Classification and Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS

Department of Information Management and Decision Sciences, School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110167, P. R. China

E-mail Address: liuy@mail.neu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author

Jian-Wu Bi

Department of Information Management and Decision Sciences, School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110167, P. R. China

E-mail Address: jianwubi@126.com

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

, and

Zhi-Ping Fan

Department of Information Management and Decision Sciences, School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110167, P. R. China

State Key Laboratory of Synthetical Automation for Process Industries, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, P. R. China

E-mail Address: zpfan@mail.neu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S021962201750033XCited by:82 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

Studies have shown that online product reviews significantly affect consumer purchase decisions. However, it is difficult for the consumer to read online product reviews one by one because the number of online reviews is very large. Thus, to facilitate consumer purchase decisions, how to rank products through online reviews is a valuable research topic. This paper proposes a method for ranking products through online reviews based on sentiment classification and the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The method consists of two parts: (1) identifying sentiment orientations of the online reviews based on sentiment classification and (2) ranking alternative products based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS. In the first part, the online reviews of the alternative products concerning multiple attributes are preprocessed, and an algorithm based on support vector machine and one-versus-one strategy is developed for classifying the sentiment orientations of online reviews into three categories: positive, neutral, and negative. In the second part, based on the percentages of the online reviews with different sentiment orientations and the numbers of online reviews of different products crawled from the website, an interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy number is constructed to represent the performance of an alternative product with respect to the product attribute. Additionally, the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method is employed to determine a ranking of the alternative products. Finally, a case analysis is provided to illustrate the application of the proposed method.

Keywords:

References

1. H. Chen, R. H. Chiang and V. C. Storey, Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact, MIS Quarterly 36 (4) (2012) 1165–1188. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
2. Y. Li, Q. Ye, Z. Zhang and T. Wang, Snippet-based unsupervised approach for sentiment classification of Chinese online reviews, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 10 (6) (2011) 1097–1110. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
3. T. Hennig-Thurau, K. P. Gwinner, G. Walsh and D. D. Gremler, Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet?, Journal of Interactive Marketing 18 (1) (2004) 38–52. Crossref, Google Scholar
4. B. Bickart and R. M. Schindler, Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information, Journal of Interactive Marketing 15 (3) (2001) 31–40. Crossref, Google Scholar
5. S. Senecal and J. Nantel, The influence of online product recommendations on consumers’ online choices, Journal of Retailing 80 (2) (2004) 159–169. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
6. A. Ghose and P. G. Ipeirotis, Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 23 (10) (2011) 1498–1512. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. T. Lappas, M. Crovella and E. Terzi, Selecting a characteristic set of reviews, in Proc. 18th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Beijing, China (2012), pp. 832–840. Google Scholar
8. K. Zhang, R. Narayanan and A. Choudhary, Mining online customer reviews for ranking products, EECS Department, Northwestern University (2009). Google Scholar
9. K. Zhang, R. Narayanan and A. N. Choudhary, Voice of the customers: Mining online customer reviews for product feature-based ranking, in Proc. 3rd Conf. Online Social Networks, Boston, MA, USA (2010), pp. 1–9. Google Scholar
10. K. Zhang, Y. Cheng, W. K. Liao and A. Choudhary, Mining millions of reviews: A technique to rank products based on importance of reviews, in Proc. 13th Int. Conf. Electronic Commerce, Liverpool, United Kingdom (2011), pp. 121–128. Google Scholar
11. Y. Peng, G. Kou and J. Li, A fuzzy PROMETHEE approach for mining customer reviews in Chinese, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 39 (6) (2014) 5245–5252. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. K. Chen, G. Kou, J. Shang and Y. Chen, Visualizing market structure through online product revi: Integrate topic modeling, TOPSIS, and multi-dimensional scaling approaches, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 14 (1) (2015) 58–74. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
13. E. Najmi, K. Hashmi, Z. Malik, A. Rezgui and H. U. Khan, CAPRA: A comprehensive approach to product ranking using customer reviews, Computing 97 (8) (2015) 843–867. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
14. X. Yang, G. Yang and J. Wu, Integrating rich and heterogeneous information to design a ranking system for multiple products, Decision Support Systems 84 (2016) 117–133. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
15. Y. Liu, J. W. Bi and Z. P. Fan, Ranking products through online reviews: A method based on sentiment analysis technique and intuitionistic fuzzy set theory, Information Fusion 36 (2016) 149–161. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
16. Z. Xu and H. Hu, Projection models for intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 9 (2) (2010) 267–280. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
17. Z. Xu, Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 15 (6) (2007) 1179–1187. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
18. Z. Xu and R. R. Yager, Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, International Journal of General Systems 35 (4) (2006) 417–433. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
19. K. T. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 20 (1) (1986) 87–96. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
20. Z. Xu and X. Cai, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information Aggregation (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2012). Crossref, Google Scholar
21. Z. Xu and R. R. Yager, Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 48 (1) (2008) 246–262. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
22. W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications (Wiley, New York, 2008). Google Scholar
23. Z. Xu, Models for multiple attribute decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy information, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 15 (3) (2007) 285–297. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
24. F. Ye, An extended TOPSIS method with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers for virtual enterprise partner selection, Expert Systems with Applications 37 (10) (2010) 7050–7055. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. T. L. Saaty, The Analytical Hierarchy Process (McGraw-Hill, Toronto, 1980). Google Scholar
26. G. Kou, D. Ergu, C. Lin and Y. Chen, Pairwise comparison matrix in multiple criteria decision making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 22 (5) (2016) 738–765. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
27. G. Kou and C. Lin, A cosine maximization method for the priority vector derivation in AHP, European Journal of Operational Research 235 (1) (2014) 225–232, DOI: HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.10.019. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
28. S. L. Huang and W. C. Cheng, Discovering Chinese sentence patterns for feature-based opinion summarization, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 14 (6) (2015) 582–591. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
29. H. Q. Zhang, A. Sekhari, Y. Ouzrout and A. Bouras, Jointly identifying opinion mining elements and fuzzy measurement of opinion intensity to analyze product features, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 47 (2016) 122–139. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
30. J. A. Balazs and J. D. Velásquez, Opinion mining and information fusion: A survey, Information Fusion 27 (2016) 95–110. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
31. W. Medhat, A. Hassan and H. Korashy, Sentiment analysis algorithms and applications: A survey, Ain Shams Engineering Journal 5 (4) (2014) 1093–1113. Crossref, Google Scholar
32. Y. Liu, J. W. Bi and Z. P. Fan, A method for multi-class sentiment classification based on an improved one-vs-one (OVO) strategy and the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm, Information Sciences 394–395 (2017) 38–52. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
33. B. Pang and L. Lee, Opinion mining and sentiment analysis, Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 2 (2008) 1–135. Crossref, Google Scholar
34. R. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto, Modern Information Retrieval (ACM Press, New York, 1999). Google Scholar
35. S. Tan and J. Zhang, An empirical study of sentiment analysis for Chinese documents, Expert Systems with Applications 34 (4) (2008) 2622–2629. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
36. G. Wang, J. Sun, J. Ma, K. Xu and J. Gu, Sentiment classification: The contribution of ensemble learning, Decision Support Systems 57 (2014) 77–93. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
37. V. N. Vapnik and V. Vapnik, Statistical Learning Theory (Wiley, New York, 1998). Google Scholar
38. M. Galar, A. Fernández, E. Barrenechea, H. Bustince and F. Herrera, An overview of ensemble methods for binary classifiers in multi-class problems: Experimental study on one-vs-one and one-vs-all schemes, Pattern Recognition 44 (8) (2011) 1761–1776. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
39. E. Hullermeier and S. Vanderlooy, Combining predictions in pairwise classification: An optimal adaptive voting strategy and its relation to weighted voting, Pattern Recognition 43 (1) (2010) 128–142. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
40. G. Kou, Y. Lu, Y. Peng and Y. Shi, Evaluation of classification algorithms using MCDM and rank correlation, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 11 (01) (2012) 197–225. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
41. G. Kou, Y. Peng and G. Wang, Evaluation of clustering algorithms for financial risk analysis using MCDM methods, Information Sciences 275 (2014) 1–12. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
42. J. Platt, Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods, Advances in Large Margin Classifiers 10 (3) (1999) 61–74. Google Scholar
43. N. Ailon and M. Mohri, An efficient reduction of ranking to classification, Machine Learning 29 (2) (2008) 103–130. Google Scholar
44. M. Galar, A. Fernández, E. Barrenechea, H. Bustince and F. Herrera, An overview of ensemble methods for binary classifiers in multi-class problems: Experimental study on one-vs-one and one-vs-all schemes, Pattern Recognition 44 (8) (2011) 1761–1776. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar