Research PaperNo Access

Big Data Analytics Implications on Central Banking Green Technological Progress

Faculty of Business, Multimedia University, Melaka, Malaysia

E-mail Address: elsadig1965@gmail.com

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622023500669Cited by:9 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

This paper examines big data analytics implications on the central banking financial system’s technological progress. A digital technological progress framework and model is established to analyze the economy’s aggregate supply via covering the monetary policy, big data analytics, pollutants emissions as independent variables and the economy’s aggregate demand as a moderating variable in a modified extensive growth theory framework and model to compute the productivity indicators and the total factor productivity (TFP) as the central banking technological progress that combined the mentioned variables qualities contribution. Besides, data analytics positive and negative externalities that include data analytics shortcomings as unpriced undesirable output in the form of cybersecurity and pollutants’ emissions among other proxies are internalized in the framework and the model to integrate the digital technology innovation with digital technology shortcomings and climate change. This revised extensive theory framework and model is a remarkable technique comprehensive of the technological progress matters and sustainable economic development and is considered one of the most important sustainable development and long-run economic growth proportions in the central banking financial system functions to manage the economy’s aggregate supply and demand that unnoticed by previous studies.

Keywords:

References

1. S. S. Poloz , Technological progress and monetary policy: Managing the fourth industrial revolution, Journal of International Money and Finance 114 (2021) 102373. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
2. R. More and Y. Moily , Big data analysis in banking sector, International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications 11(4) (2021) 1–5. Google Scholar
3. P. Mikalef, I. O. Pappas, J. Krogstie and M. Giannakos , Big data analytics capabilities: A systematic literature review and research agenda, Information Systems and e-Business Management 16(3) (2018) 547–578. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
4. P. Mikalef, J. Krogstie, I. O. Pappas and P. Pavlou , Exploring the relationship between big data analytics capability and competitive performance: The mediating roles of dynamic and operational capabilities, Information & Management 57(2) (2020) 103169. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
5. R. M. Grant , The resource-based theory of competitive advantage–implications for strategy formulation, California Management Review, 33 (1991) 114–135. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
6. F. Sebastiani and A. Esuli , Sentiwordnet: A publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining, in Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Language Resources and Evaluation (Genoa, Italy, 2006), pp. 417–422. Google Scholar
7. A. Kinywamaghana and S. Steffen , A note on the use of machine learning in central banking, FIRE Research Paper (2021), 1–13. Google Scholar
8. C. Chakraborty and A. Joseph , Machine learning at central banks, Bank of England Working Paper No. 674, Social Science Research Network (2017). Google Scholar
9. M. Carney , AI and the global economy, in Speech, Machine Learning and the Market for Intelligence Conf. Rotman School of Management (University of Toronto, Toronto, 2018). Google Scholar
10. B. Tissot , Big data for central banks, in Proc. IFC – Bank Indonesia Int. Workshop and Seminar on “Big Data for Central Bank Policies/Building Pathways for Policy Making with Big Data” (Bali, 2018), pp. 357–368. Google Scholar
11. E. Santor , Digital policy-making in a data-driven world, Speech, improved central bank data management in a digital age, Social Science Research Network (2019), https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4232667 Google Scholar
12. S. di Castri, S. Hohl, A. Kulenkampff and J. Prenio , The suptech generations, Social Science Research Network (2019), https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4232667 Crossref, Google Scholar
13. M. Boutros, The information effect of monetary policy (2018), https://ssrn.com/ abstract=3716578. Google Scholar
14. E. Feyen, J. Frost, L. Gambacorta, H. Natarajan and M. Saal, Fintech and the digital transformation of financial services: Implications for market structure and public policy, BIS Paper No. 117, Bank for International Settlements (2021). Google Scholar
15. L. Badea, C. M. Rangu and M. C. Scheau , Fintech–financial innovation facilitators, Acta Universitatis Danubius, OEconomica 17(3) (2021) 301–316. Google Scholar
16. A. I. Sabău, M. V. Achim and L. I. Safta , Does corporate governance may enhance the digitalization process? A panel data analysis, in 23rd RSEP International Economics, Finance & Business Conf. (University of Washington Rome Center, Rome, Italy, 2021) p. 287. Google Scholar
17. M. Shapova, T. Varbanov and E. Ovchinnikov , Digital economy across EU: Convergence or club convergence?, in 23rd RSEP Int. Economics, Finance & Business Conf. (University of Washington Rome Center, Rome, Italy, 2021), pp. 357–368. Google Scholar
18. E. M. Ahmed , Modelling green productivity spillover effects on sustainable development, World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development 17(3) (2019) 257–267, https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/WJSTSD-01-2020-0009/full/html. Crossref, Google Scholar
19. M. Z. Chishti and A. Sinha , Do the shocks in technological and financial innovation influence the environmental quality? Evidence from BRICS economies, Technology in Society 68 (2022) 101828. Crossref, Google Scholar
20. S. Shirai, Green central banking and regulation to foster sustainable finance, ADBI Working Paper No. 1361, Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo (2023). Google Scholar
21. U. Milkau , Climate change risk: Demands and expectations imposed on banks, Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions 15(3) (2022) 278–300. Crossref, Google Scholar
22. L. Kanner, FSB roadmap for addressing climate-related financial risks (2021). Google Scholar
23. J. Vestergaard , Monetary Policy for the Climate? A money view perspective on green central banking, Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series No. 188, Social Science Research Network (2022), https://ssrn.com/abstract=4209718. Google Scholar
24. L. Boneva, G. Ferrucci and F. P. Mongelli , Monetary policy and the green transition, SUERF Policy Brief 268 (2022) 1–8. Google Scholar
25. P. M. Romer , Increasing returns and long-run growth, Journal of Political Economy 94(5) (1986) 1002–1037. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
26. P. M. Romer , Growth based on increasing returns due to specialization, The American Economic Review, Chapters and Proceedings 77(2) (1987a) 56–62. Web of Science, Google Scholar
27. P. M. Romer , Crazy explanations for the productivity slowdown, NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2 (1987b) 163–210. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
28. P. M. Romer , Endogenous technological change, Journal of Political Economy 98(5) (1990) S71–S102. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
29. P. M. Romer , Two strategies for economic development: Using ideas and producing ideas, The World Bank Economic Review 6(1) (1992) 63–91. Crossref, Google Scholar
30. W. D. Nordhaus , Resources as a constraint on growth, The American Economic Review 64(2) (1974) 22–26. Web of Science, Google Scholar
31. W. D. Nordhaus, Can we control carbon dioxide? IIASA Working Paper No. 75-063, Vienna (1975). Google Scholar
32. W. D. Nordhaus , Economic growth and climate: The carbon dioxide problem, The American Economic Review 67(1) (1977) 341–346. Google Scholar
33. W. D. Nordhaus , Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of Climate Change (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994a). Google Scholar
34. W. D. Nordhaus , Expert opinion on climate change, American Scientist 82(1) (1994b) 45–51. Google Scholar
35. W. D. Nordhaus , Integrated economic and climate modelling, in Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, eds. P. B. Dixon and D. Jorgenson (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2013), pp. 1069–1131. Crossref, Google Scholar
36. W. D. Nordhaus , Estimates of the social cost of carbon: Concepts and results from the DICE-2013R model and alternative approaches, Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 1(1–2) (2014) 273–312. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
37. W. D. Nordhaus, Projections and uncertainties about climate change in an era of minimal climate policies, NBER Working Paper No. 22933, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA (2017). Google Scholar
38. W. D. Nordhaus, Evolution of modeling of the economics of global warming: Changes in the DICE model, 1992-2017, Climatic Change 148(4) (2018a) 623–640. Google Scholar
39. E. M. Ahmed , Carbon dioxide emissions, impact on Malaysia’s manufacturing productivity growth, World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development 3(1) (2006) 58–69. Crossref, Google Scholar
40. E. M. Ahmed , The impact of biochemical oxygen demand emissions on Malaysia’s manufacturing productivity growth, Global Economic Review 36(4) (2007) 305–319. Crossref, Google Scholar
41. R. M. Solow , The production function and the theory of capital, The Review of Economic Studies 23(2) (1955) 101–108. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
42. R. M. Solow , Technical change and the aggregate production function, The Review of Economics and Statistics 39(3) (1957) 312–320. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
43. R. W. Pittman , Multilateral productivity comparisons with undesirable output, Economic Journal 93 (1983) 883–891. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
44. W. J. Baumol and W. E. Oates , The Theory of Environmental Policy (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1988). Crossref, Google Scholar
45. K. Chaston, G. Swinand, F. Gollop and R. Arontt , A Welfare-Based Measure of Productivity Growth with Environmental Externalities (Department of Economics, USA Boston College, 1997). Google Scholar
46. F. M. Gollop and G. P. Swinand , Total resource productivity: Accounting for changing environmental quality, in New Directions in Productivity Analysis. Conf. Research in Income and Wealth, eds. E. Dean, M. Harper and C. Hulten (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, MI, 2001). Google Scholar
47. F. M. Gollop and G. P. Swinand , From total factor to total resource productivity: An application to agriculture, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80 (1998) 577–583. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
48. F. M. Gollop and M. J. Roberts , Environmental regulations and productivity growth: The case of fossil-fueled electric power generation, Journal of Political Economy 91 (1983) 654–674. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
49. T. Harchaoui, D. Kabrelyan and R. Smith , Accounting for greenhouse gases in the standard productivity framework, Statistics Canada: Micro-Economic Analysis Division (2002). Crossref, Google Scholar
50. E. M. Ahmed , ICT and human capital spillover effects in achieving sustainable East Asian knowledge-based economies, The Journal of Knowledge Economy 8(3) (2017) 1086–1112. Crossref, Google Scholar
51. E. M. Ahmed , Modelling information and communications technology cybersecurity externalities spillover effects on sustainable economic growth, Journal of the Knowledge Economy 12 (2021) 412–430, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00627-3. Crossref, Google Scholar
52. G. Kou, S. Yüksel and H. Dinçer , Inventive problem-solving map of innovative carbon emission strategies for solar energy-based transportation investment projects, Applied Energy 311 (2022) 118680. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
53. G. Kou, Ö. Olgu Akdeniz, H. Dinçer and S. Yüksel , Fintech investments in European banks: a hybrid IT2 fuzzy multidimensional decision-making approach, Financial Innovation 7(1) (2021) 39. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
54. T. Li, G. Kou, Y. Peng and S. Y. Philip , An integrated cluster detection, optimization, and interpretation approach for financial data, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 52(12) (2021) 13848–13861. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
55. E. M. Ahmed and K. E. Elfaki , Green technological progress implications on long-run sustainable economic growth, Journal of the Knowledge Economy (2023) 1–18. Web of Science, Google Scholar
56. E. M. Ahmed , Are bio-economy dimensions’ new stream of the knowledge economy? World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development 15(2) (2018) 142–155, https://doi.org/10.1108/WJSTSD-06-2017-0014. Crossref, Google Scholar
57. E. M. Ahmed , COVID-19 implications on IsDB member countries sustainable digital economies, International Journal of Innovation and Knowledge Management in Middle East and North Africa 8(1–2) (2020) 12–37. Crossref, Google Scholar
58. D. W. Jorgenson, F. M. Gollop and B. Fraumenri , Productivity and US Economic Growth (Amsterdam, North Holland, 1987). Google Scholar
59. J. Champagne, G. P. Bellisle and P. Sekkel, Evaluating the bank of Canada staff economic projections using a new database of real-time data and forecasts, Bank of Canada Staff Working Paper No. 2018-52, Bank of Canada (2018). Google Scholar
60. S. Doerr, L. Gambacorta and J. M. S. Garralda, Big data and machine learning in central banking, BIS Working Paper No. 930, Bank for International Settlements (2021). Google Scholar
61. W. D. Nordhaus, and P. M. Romer , Integrating Innovation and Climate with Economic Growth, Scientific Background on the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2018 (The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences Stockholm, Sweden, 2018). Google Scholar
62. IBM, Big data analytics (2022), https://www.ibm.com/analytics/big-data-analytics. Google Scholar
63. World Bank Group, World Development Report 2021: Data for Better Lives, Report, The World Bank (2021). Google Scholar
64. W. D. Nordhaus and P. M. Romer , Integrating innovation and climate with economic growth, scientific background on the sveriges riksbank prize in economic sciences in memory of alfred nobel 2018, Stockholm, Sweden: The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (2018). Google Scholar
65. E. M. Ahmed , Green TFP intensity impact on sustainable east asian productivity growth, Economic Analysis & Policy, 42(1) (2012) 67–78. Crossref, Google Scholar
66. E. M. Ahmed, Modelling digital economy implications on long-run economic development (IntechOpen, UK, 2022). Google Scholar
67. E. M. Ahmed , Digital big data role in economic decisions in the digital economy era, in Albaraka 42 Symp., July 2022, Almdanah, KSA, pp. 1–34. Google Scholar